• Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech

Combo suggestions

  • Thread starter Thread starter Z06killinSBF
  • Start date Start date Mar 28, 2006

Z06killinSBF

Member
Apr 25, 2005
457
1
19
McKinney, TX
Mar 28, 2006
#1
  • Mar 28, 2006
  • #1
Current combo:

.040 289
Forged TRW's
Isky 262 cam (.445/.445 262/262adv 108*)
Ported E7's w/ adj. 1.6rr's
RPM Air-Gap
600 Edelbrock carb

This combo puts the car in a 13.9 1/4 with 2.80's and a C4. I am in the process of putting a T-5 in it and will eventually put decent gears in it.

The question is that I have a Comp Cams xe-266-hr (.544/.555 216/224 112*) roller cam sitting in my garage that I planned to put into my 5.0. Plans changed. How well would this cam work in my combo? Would I have to worry about valve clearance? I dont know where my compression ratio is with these heads. 64cc vs. 54cc. Any advice. Thanks
 

Z06killinSBF

Member
Apr 25, 2005
457
1
19
McKinney, TX
Mar 30, 2006
#2
  • Mar 30, 2006
  • #2
No one?
 
T

tylerrocks

New Member
Oct 13, 2005
514
0
0
Big Spring, TX
Mar 30, 2006
#3
  • Mar 30, 2006
  • #3
Well, you should always check P-V clearences because timing events (ramp rates) are what will cause problems. That being said I have an F303 with 1.7 RR .544/.544 lift 226/226 @.05 and GT-40p heads with a zero deck and I have over .150 clearence.
 

SoCalCruising

Founding Member
Jul 25, 2000
2,437
0
47
SoCal
Mar 30, 2006
#4
  • Mar 30, 2006
  • #4
You should call Comp and see what they say. You may need a retrofit-type cam with a different base circle, or maybe just using linked roller tappets is okay - I'm not sure as my block is a roller block and I didn't have to look into that. As far as cam specs go, I would think that that cam would be fine. You don't want to use too big of a cam (duration-wise) with 64cc heads or you will loose too much dynamic compression. It would be a good idea to have the heads shaved.

Your springs are likey not optimum for that cam and you must use screw-in studs. P-V clearance should always be checked, but it should be okay if you are using valves that match (or are smaller than) the valve reliefs on your pistons.
 
5

57fairlane

New Member
Apr 2, 2005
560
0
0
Oakwood, GA
Mar 30, 2006
#5
  • Mar 30, 2006
  • #5
The t-5 and a gear will definetly keep a smile on your face for the next couple of months or so.

But I think, as in any project, you really need to decide your plans. If you don't want to spend too much more and decide you are close to the end of your project, I would get a custom ground cam and mill the heads some (probably end up spending for some new pushrods) and call it a day. You can get a hyd flat tappet from Jay Allen for $140. Would be much better than any OTS cam.

But that XE cam won't work in the block you have unless you get different roller lifters (expensive).
 
D

D.Hearne

New Member
Sep 29, 2000
11,730
6
0
south louisiana
Mar 30, 2006
#6
  • Mar 30, 2006
  • #6
I'd guess your comp ratio is way low at around 8 to 1. Less if the pistons have anything less than a zero deck clearance. Increasing the compressed volume by 10cc's is at least good for a 1 full point reduction in the ratio. I don't have my calculator here, but I'll bet I'm not far off on this. Now if those TRW's are the popup's, then disregard this estimate. As for the P/V clearance, I don't think you'd have a problem with the roller.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

6
Hey all,I’m putting together a 302 for my 1968 Mustang and wanted to post the combo + some questions to make sure I’m not missing crucial
  • 68_Disgustang
  • Feb 22, 2026
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
3
Views
664
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Feb 28, 2026
Noobz347
M
Engine Cam Question
  • Middleagecrisis
  • Jan 10, 2022
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
5
Views
1K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Jan 14, 2022
Middleagecrisis
M
J
347 Stroker, sound reasonable?
  • jeraldjcook
  • Sep 18, 2009
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
1
Views
846
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Sep 18, 2009
2000xp8
HP guess
  • Z06killinSBF
  • Oct 5, 2007
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech
Replies
3
Views
638
Classic Mustang Specific Tech Oct 5, 2007
fasttback
W
need help building a 347 for my procharger
  • wadman1
  • Jan 27, 2010
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
12
Views
3K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Jan 29, 2010
wadman1
W
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?