• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech

Compression results, thought I would share.

  • Thread starter Thread starter a_k
  • Start date Start date Dec 30, 2005

a_k

New Member
Nov 12, 2004
170
0
0
Saratoga NY
Dec 30, 2005
#1
  • Dec 30, 2005
  • #1
The other night I went and did a compression test and I am really suprised. Here are the results.

1 - 120
2 - 100
3 - 100
4 - n/a I didn't feel like bothering with it after the rest of them
5 - 105
6 - 100
7 - 100
8 - 100

The engine has 124k on it but it ran strong or so it seemed. Oh well there goes the h/c/i plan. The good news is i'll have a fresh bottom end. I went and talked to the engine builder and it's not as expensive as I though
 

HISSIN50

"How long does it take to get help in here?
15 Year Member
Nov 29, 1999
31,179
33
129
Dec 30, 2005
#2
  • Dec 30, 2005
  • #2
Are you sure the tester's gauge works ok? Was the motor hot (not as important for hypereutectic pistons as forged, but still..........).

I would do a wet compression test to see how dramatically the numbers go up.

Good luck.
 

a50sn95

Founding Member
Oct 12, 2001
368
0
16
Elk Grove, CA
Dec 30, 2005
#3
  • Dec 30, 2005
  • #3
You held the throttle wide open during the tests, right...?
 

VibrantRedGT

"STANGNET'S PENGUIN SMACKER"
15 Year Member
Nov 29, 1999
14,679
424
154
Boca Raton, Florida
Dec 30, 2005
#4
  • Dec 30, 2005
  • #4
a50sn95 said:
You held the throttle wide open during the tests, right...?
Click to expand...

Doesn't look like it. The motor can't be ice cold either. Also hook up a battery charger while doing the test.
 

Zero Signal

Active Member
Feb 24, 2003
2,633
2
46
Tucson, AZ
Dec 30, 2005
#5
  • Dec 30, 2005
  • #5
Yeah the battery will start to die and your results will show less and less pressure as you go. I made that mistake the first time around.
 

ROLLIN5.0

New Member
Nov 19, 2004
135
0
0
Tulsa, OK
Dec 30, 2005
#6
  • Dec 30, 2005
  • #6
I wouldn't be too concerned with those results. There are a ton of factors that can give you low readings. The main goal is to see similar results across the board, which it looks like you did.
Brandon
 

a_k

New Member
Nov 12, 2004
170
0
0
Saratoga NY
Dec 31, 2005
#7
  • Dec 31, 2005
  • #7
a50sn95 said:
You held the throttle wide open during the tests, right...?
Click to expand...


I did not do that, I'll try that again, but I did test the compression on my 82 rabbit and its got 122 all across.... Hopefully it will go up a little
 
I

igotyofire

Member
Feb 26, 2004
774
1
19
Southern California
Dec 31, 2005
#8
  • Dec 31, 2005
  • #8
whats normal for our 9:01 compression stangs
 
G

Green 94 5.0

Founding Member
Mar 25, 2002
2,601
12
79
Ft. Lauderdale, FL
Dec 31, 2005
#9
  • Dec 31, 2005
  • #9
as someone above me said, uniformity with the numbers is more important than the actual reading to a point. try it again with the throttle open and the numbers should rise a bit.
 

CManT1914

New Member
Feb 5, 2004
3,172
2
0
Killeen, Texas
Dec 31, 2005
#10
  • Dec 31, 2005
  • #10
igotyofire said:
whats normal for our 9:01 compression stangs
Click to expand...

You're mainly looking for an average reading, not one in particular. So if cylinders 1, 2, and 4 are 140, while 3 is 100, something is fubar with cylinder 3.

FWIW, when I did my compression tests this summer, I got around 155 to 160 all around.
 

mo_dingo

20+ Year Stangneter
Aug 26, 2003
3,031
2
58
Tucson, AZ
Dec 31, 2005
#11
  • Dec 31, 2005
  • #11
igotyofire said:
whats normal for our 9:01 compression stangs
Click to expand...

Ours are 9.5:1, fyi


And consistency in numbers is more important. Do it dry and wet, as that will tell you whether you have a head problem, or a ring problem, respectively.
Scott
 

blksn955.o

Founding Member
Mar 15, 2002
3,263
0
66
st.louis mo 314
Dec 31, 2005
#12
  • Dec 31, 2005
  • #12
I have always seen like 8.8:1 or 8.9:1 as the comp. on the 94-95 GT's?
 
M

mackey

Active Member
Jan 25, 2003
1,284
1
38
Beverly, Massachusetts
Dec 31, 2005
#13
  • Dec 31, 2005
  • #13
8.5:1
 

blksn955.o

Founding Member
Mar 15, 2002
3,263
0
66
st.louis mo 314
Dec 31, 2005
#14
  • Dec 31, 2005
  • #14
/\/\/\

havre seen that too. I ahve never seen above 9:1


**ps kind drunk right now
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Engine 1990 LX 5.0L EFI Mustang Fuel Management Problems - HELP!
  • 5.0LXStanger
  • May 25, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2 3
Replies
45
Views
2K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Jul 11, 2025
5.0LXStanger
Place to Avoid: Jamison Auto Group in Gulfport, MS
  • D Durden
  • Oct 20, 2025
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • 2 3
Replies
45
Views
2K
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Feb 4, 2026
nickyb
Engine removed timming chain put back a new one now i lost power?
  • Creomod
  • Oct 5, 2021
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2
Replies
22
Views
3K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Oct 15, 2021
Mstng93SSP
K
SOLD 1988 Ford Mustang GT, lots of upgrades, Maximum Motorsports Suspension PRICE DROP $6800
  • kuhl0040
  • Aug 18, 2021
  • Fox Body Mustangs For Sale (1979-93)
Replies
4
Views
4K
Fox Body Mustangs For Sale (1979-93) Sep 20, 2021
Noobz347
1988 4cyl 5 speed (Compression issues) [Help!]
  • Golypon
  • May 7, 2020
  • 2.3L (N/A & Turbo) Tech
  • 2 3 4
Replies
75
Views
9K
2.3L (N/A & Turbo) Tech Apr 5, 2022
Golypon
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?