• Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech

Compression

  • Thread starter Thread starter stupidslow02gt
  • Start date Start date Jan 25, 2009
S

stupidslow02gt

New Member
Nov 3, 2007
37
0
0
Jan 25, 2009
#1
  • Jan 25, 2009
  • #1
I don't understand why people keep telling me that this set up will net me 8.5:1 compression when this calculator is telling me otherwise. I have stock ported heads from an 02 GT with 43cc combustion chambers, -20cc dished pistons, and am trying to get my compression to 9.1:1-9.3:1. The block is 20 over.


Compressed head gasket thickness is .036in and deck volume is .012. I am using ford OEM MLS gaskets.


 

Attachments

  • compression.webp
    54.9 KB · Views: 106

CobraRed_96_GT

Active Member
May 20, 2006
1,421
4
39
UCSD/La Jolla
Jan 25, 2009
#2
  • Jan 25, 2009
  • #2
Static compression to net 9:1 with .20 over is a 18CC piston, 17CC will get you near 9.15:1. Trust me, i'm running a .20 over shortblock with a 18CC manley with PI heads. W/out .20 over you're closer to 8.9:1, a 23cc dish manley will get you closer to 8.5:1 - but .20 over it's more like 18.6:1.

Edit: BTW it's 42cc chamber, not 43: http://www.mre-books.com/sa82/sa82_5.html
43/44 is likely where i am since mine are ported.
 
S

stupidslow02gt

New Member
Nov 3, 2007
37
0
0
Jan 25, 2009
#3
  • Jan 25, 2009
  • #3
Ok, so did I mis-type something into the compression calculator above? Because it is not aggreeing with you. Also, from what I've read PI heads have between 42-44cc chambers that also seems to be unconfirmed. And I have stage 3 heads on my car that still have 42cc combustion chambers, so porting doesnt necessarily mean bigger chambers.
 

CobraRed_96_GT

Active Member
May 20, 2006
1,421
4
39
UCSD/La Jolla
Jan 25, 2009
#4
  • Jan 25, 2009
  • #4
stupidslow02gt said:
Ok, so did I mis-type something into the compression calculator above? Because it is not aggreeing with you. Also, from what I've read PI heads have between 42-44cc chambers that also seems to be unconfirmed. And I have stage 3 heads on my car that still have 42cc combustion chambers, so porting doesnt necessarily mean bigger chambers.
Click to expand...
Porting usually means taking of the low-rpm emissions ledge by the intake valve, with smoothing account for up to 2cc of volume.
i don't really care if the calc agrees with me or not - look at gear ratios calcs, use three different ones and you'll come out with three different answers.
Use common sense, a stock 99/00 mustang came with 18.10CC piston dishes making around 8.84+:1 compression according to ford's stats. That's with PI heads. Take off .1CC of dish and add .20 of bore and you have just about 9:1 compression. Also every modular engine builder saying manley 18cc's put you at 8.9-9:1 helps too.
Not sure what else you need. I HAVE a forged 18cc shortblock and ported PI heads.
 
S

stupidslow02gt

New Member
Nov 3, 2007
37
0
0
Jan 25, 2009
#5
  • Jan 25, 2009
  • #5
Ok so you are telling me that 17cc is where i need to be?
 

CobraRed_96_GT

Active Member
May 20, 2006
1,421
4
39
UCSD/La Jolla
Jan 25, 2009
#6
  • Jan 25, 2009
  • #6
stupidslow02gt said:
Ok so you are telling me that 17cc is where i need to be?
Click to expand...
I'm saying JE/modmax/kieth black/CP 17cc pistons or mahle 16cc pistons will put you basically where you need to be. Ask a modular shop to confirm.
 

Stan Weiss

Member
Dec 8, 2006
347
2
16
Philadelphia, PA
Jan 26, 2009
#7
  • Jan 26, 2009
  • #7
I have a calculator on my web site Automotive Performance Software / Interactive JavaScripts Calculators and using your inputs get 9.2082:1 CR. The problem is that I have the head gasket bore set to 3.572 inches and it is probably bigger than that. So measure the bore size of the head gasket and recalculate your CR.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

6
Hey all,I’m putting together a 302 for my 1968 Mustang and wanted to post the combo + some questions to make sure I’m not missing crucial
  • 68_Disgustang
  • Feb 22, 2026
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
3
Views
642
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Feb 28, 2026
Noobz347
P
Best heads for my build?
  • pettyeod
  • Nov 13, 2023
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
9
Views
2K
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Nov 16, 2023
LILCBRA
3
Eight inches is enough for me...
  • 351MooseStang
  • Nov 27, 2025
  • 1974 - 1978 Mustang II Talk & Tech
Replies
5
Views
495
1974 - 1978 Mustang II Talk & Tech Mar 2, 2026
Bullitt347
J
Progress Thread Family member 1989 GT- Backstory and updates
  • JRC99
  • Apr 19, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
15
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Oct 26, 2025
JRC99
J
GT40 Heads Issues
  • PonyGTrider
  • Jan 23, 2023
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
20
Views
6K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jan 27, 2023
PonyGTrider
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?