Engine Cooling fan dyno comparison

FastDriver

My dad had a bra
SN Certified Technician
Sep 5, 2001
5,312
1,920
224
Fort Knox, KY
Just thought this might be useful some day. Apologies if repost.

Shroud(326.7/388.8) vs. no shroud (318.6/388.1):

View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Os_Hna9DZa8


From the Engine masters cooling fan shoot out video:
Test engine: 350 chevy
Engine dyno

No fan: 349/406.9
628138



Clutch Fan: 335/400
628139



Plastic flex fan: 325.1/388.3
628140



Aluminum Fan: 328.7/394.9
628141


Fixed steel OEM fan: 318.6/388
628142
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user
  • Sponsors (?)


The magnitude of the result is surprising, but the result itself is not. The reason no shroud made more power is because it's not taxed with drawing as much air through the radiator. So the question is, how does it *cool*? Or...install an electric fan.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 users
I kinda cringe everytime I see a mustang or another vehicle with an engine driven fan and no shroud. The shroud is there to direct the air through the radiator. My 96' jeep 4.0 had the top section of the fan shroud missing above the clutch fan. When I re-attached the top section, I actually noticed an improvement in my coolant temperature. I would rather make slightly less hp and have a more efficient cooling system.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user