• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech

crane pedistal to stud conversion

  • Thread starter Thread starter midlife89
  • Start date Start date Mar 18, 2007

midlife89

Member
Mar 30, 2005
91
0
6
youngstown,oh
Mar 18, 2007
#1
  • Mar 18, 2007
  • #1
Just wondering if any one out there has any experience with this conversion?I have ped heads n don't want the hassle/expense of removeing them to have them changed to stud mount.The reason I'm thinking of this is because I have a set of 1.7 Enegizers that are loud as s**t.Tried setting them between 1/4 n 1 turn n still they are loud.Plus I went with a TF stage 1 cam with them.Too much for my set up?(details in sig).Plus I lost a lot of bottom end.Thinking of going to 1.6 RR and advancing the cam 2 deg to try and get some bottom end back.Just can't decide if I should stick with ped or go with stud.Almost forgot,anyone use scopion rr?You like them ?.Any info would be appreciated,
Thanks
 

TheBocSez

New Member
Feb 3, 2004
652
0
0
Converse, TX
Mar 18, 2007
#2
  • Mar 18, 2007
  • #2
I am running the Crane Ped / Stud conversion kit. What would you like to know? Works great.
 

midlife89

Member
Mar 30, 2005
91
0
6
youngstown,oh
Mar 18, 2007
#3
  • Mar 18, 2007
  • #3
think going down to 1.6 RR and advancing the cam 2 degree will help my bottom end?
 

midlife89

Member
Mar 30, 2005
91
0
6
youngstown,oh
Mar 18, 2007
#4
  • Mar 18, 2007
  • #4
almost wish i would've stayed with the stock cam
 

TheBocSez

New Member
Feb 3, 2004
652
0
0
Converse, TX
Mar 18, 2007
#5
  • Mar 18, 2007
  • #5
Its a pretty common set up, I dont understand why you would have lost a LOT of bottom end. Anytime you step up in cam size and head size, your going to shift your powerband up, but it shouldnt feel like a slug or anything, Those 3.73's should have made up for any loss of low end.

Are you sure you installed you cam as recommended by the manufacturer? New timing chain too?

Now, if your rockers are adjusted incorrectly, it can cause issues. Is it possible that you are running the wrong length pushrods? I am running the Crane energizer rockers with the Crane stud conversion kit and the longer pushrods for that set up.
 

midlife89

Member
Mar 30, 2005
91
0
6
youngstown,oh
Mar 18, 2007
#6
  • Mar 18, 2007
  • #6
I'm using standard length push rods,was told I could use them.If they were the wrong length wouldn't I have trouble reaching the tourqe spec with in 1/4 to 1 turn?
 

midlife89

Member
Mar 30, 2005
91
0
6
youngstown,oh
Mar 18, 2007
#7
  • Mar 18, 2007
  • #7
I did change the lifters,timing chain and cam straight up.Called TF and they said advance was built into the cam.If that makes any sense?
 

TheBocSez

New Member
Feb 3, 2004
652
0
0
Converse, TX
Mar 18, 2007
#8
  • Mar 18, 2007
  • #8
I believe so, but to be honest, I'm not 100% on pedistal rockers, never adjusted them before. Went from my stock 5.0 to the rebuilt with the conversion. Reason I was thinking its something in your valvetrain adjustment is because of the loud rockers and loss of power.
 

midlife89

Member
Mar 30, 2005
91
0
6
youngstown,oh
Mar 18, 2007
#9
  • Mar 18, 2007
  • #9
I 've thought that it was wierd that they were louder than the non rollers,guess I should get a push rod length checker n see if thats the problem.Would/could a cam change mess with the pushrod length?
 

TheBocSez

New Member
Feb 3, 2004
652
0
0
Converse, TX
Mar 18, 2007
#10
  • Mar 18, 2007
  • #10
Yeah, cams can have the advance ground into them. Dont know if I would mess with the cam timing a whole lot, with the 1.7's you are running 530/541 lift already, and heads with larger valves. If its on stock pistons, i'd be more concerned with PTV clearance and valve float, dont know what the springs on the performer heads are rated to.

Also, is it possible that maybe some of the noise you are hearing from the rockers could be them hitting the top of the valve cover? Its a common problem with 1.7's and stock 5.0 valve covers.

Have you already pulled codes from the EEC to see if maybe its something there?

I know Im not offering a lot of help here, sorry, just trying to bounce some ideas off you.
 

midlife89

Member
Mar 30, 2005
91
0
6
youngstown,oh
Mar 18, 2007
#11
  • Mar 18, 2007
  • #11
I should look into straightening out what I have,I too have seen many guys on here with almost the same set up,with no complaints.Didn't mess with it much last year after my x filed for a disolution.In fact stuck it in my dad's names to keep her from messing with.Never used one of those pushrod length checkers before sure hope them come with directions,lol
 

midlife89

Member
Mar 30, 2005
91
0
6
youngstown,oh
Mar 18, 2007
#12
  • Mar 18, 2007
  • #12
think the springs were good to .650,never messed with the timing or any thing,still set at 10 btdc,gonna look into the valve cover think,checked clearance with a dial indicator and was ok,yes they are stock pistons
 

midlife89

Member
Mar 30, 2005
91
0
6
youngstown,oh
Mar 18, 2007
#13
  • Mar 18, 2007
  • #13
No,you've been plenty of help.No trouble light has been tripped,but haven't tried to pull any codes.Figured there wouldn't be any if the light hasn't tripped
 

TheBocSez

New Member
Feb 3, 2004
652
0
0
Converse, TX
Mar 18, 2007
#14
  • Mar 18, 2007
  • #14
You can get an idea of your geometry by pulling the VC and the rockers, cleaning the valve stem tip of the oil and coloring it with a marker. Reinstall the rockers and then hand rotating the engine. Remove the rockers and they will have worn away the marker where the roller contacts the valve. Ideally you want it centered. More worn towards the intake = pushrods too short, towards the headers = too long. You would want to do this fairly soon after the engine is run so the lifters stay pumped. I did this but was kinda lazy in that I only did it on the intake and exhaust on 2 cylinders per side, figured if 1/2 were correct, the others probably were too LOL.

Dont know about the Performers, but I believe the TFS heads require a different length pushrod, so maybe.

On my set up, Crane makes a pushrod that is .117 longer just for the Stud conversion kit / energizer rocker combo that I went with.
 

midlife89

Member
Mar 30, 2005
91
0
6
youngstown,oh
Mar 18, 2007
#15
  • Mar 18, 2007
  • #15
yes the TF does use a diff length,my friend is running them
 

TheBocSez

New Member
Feb 3, 2004
652
0
0
Converse, TX
Mar 18, 2007
#16
  • Mar 18, 2007
  • #16
Never hurts to know about the codes, I use this method with the check engine light and it works great. Just follow the directions and have a pad and paper ready.
http://www.my5oh.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=190
 

midlife89

Member
Mar 30, 2005
91
0
6
youngstown,oh
Mar 18, 2007
#17
  • Mar 18, 2007
  • #17
a friend told me about a guy with loud RR n that installing longer pushrods solved the problem,so i'm definatley gonna check into that.
 
Y

Yellowpnoy

New Member
Feb 6, 2006
203
0
0
Mar 18, 2007
#18
  • Mar 18, 2007
  • #18
Have you checked to see if the rocker is actually hitting the top of the valve spring? If you went with larger springs, this could happen, make sure the fulcrum has enough clearance. Also, that can happen if the pushrods are too short and causing the rocker to bind, when the pushrod goes down, it goes so far that the valve retainer actually hits the rocker pushing the roller off the top of the valve, this could make for a very noisy valvetrain. Just a thought!
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

6
Hey all,I’m putting together a 302 for my 1968 Mustang and wanted to post the combo + some questions to make sure I’m not missing crucial
  • 68_Disgustang
  • Feb 22, 2026
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
4
Views
763
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Jun 20, 2026
gray owl
G
SN95 Desktop 363 Engine Combination - Looking for input
  • WhiteCobra95
  • Sep 8, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
11
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Oct 6, 2025
Habu135
SOLD SOLD!!!! 1993 Notchback Roadracer For Sale. She's a beast!
  • Boydster
  • Apr 25, 2025
  • Fox Body Mustangs For Sale (1979-93)
Replies
0
Views
1K
Fox Body Mustangs For Sale (1979-93) Apr 25, 2025
Boydster
Engine adjust roller rockers on new 393
  • maxine-70
  • Dec 27, 2023
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
16
Views
2K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Dec 30, 2023
AeroCoupe
Idle spark confusion
  • sav22rem22
  • Oct 26, 2023
  • Digital Self-tuning Forum
Replies
2
Views
2K
Digital Self-tuning Forum Nov 1, 2023
sav22rem22
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?