Other things that ruin the 68s for me:mustangdave said:68' are ugly; the fake side vents make the 67 better.:SNSign:
mustangdave said:Let them get all they can for their crap. It makes ours more valuable.
mustangdave said:The quarter panels were also different from 67-68 which most people don't know.
mustangdave said:Glad you asked. The C-scoops angles were different. I think tchelle had a hermaphrodite at one time. The door jamb was the same causing many to believe they were the same. No. On the 67, the indentation drops steeply for about 5/8" and with a sharp bend slopes forward to the jamb. On the 68 , the indentation slopes gently forward for about 2 1/2" , then a soft radius slopes forward to the jamb. If you see the two side by side, it is obvious; other wise, you would argue the point. I like the 67 design much better because I think the angle accentuates the car better, not to mention I like the scoops that can be made functional with little effort.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?