• Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech

Densecharger vs. K&N FIPK II

  • Thread starter Thread starter NewbStang
  • Start date Start date Jan 2, 2004
N

NewbStang

New Member
May 31, 2003
213
0
0
Jan 2, 2004
#1
  • Jan 2, 2004
  • #1
I know intakes dont do much fo rour car but which would you guys recommend between the two
 

silver02horse

New Member
Oct 7, 2003
40
0
0
Columbus, OH
Jan 2, 2004
#2
  • Jan 2, 2004
  • #2
Neither. Save your money and just buy a K&N filter.
 

OleGrayCar

Special Ed
Founding Member
Dec 28, 2001
1,116
0
0
pullin' that draft, fillin' up your rearview
Jan 2, 2004
#3
  • Jan 2, 2004
  • #3
Neither one.
Get yourself one of these instead..........
http://www.cnlperformance.com/80mm_96-01.html
 

Babbat

New Member
May 25, 2003
97
0
0
Long Island, NY
Jan 2, 2004
#4
  • Jan 2, 2004
  • #4
NewbStang said:
I know intakes dont do much for our car but which would you guys recommend between the two
Click to expand...

No! not another CAI question!!!

The truth is that most people here will either tell you it's a POS and a waste of money or that it'll get you 20+ HP. The truth is that on a stock car, you'll see nothing and you MAY see something on a modified car. That said, I've heard good things about the fit n finish of both systems. Personally, I prefer the Densecharger, but that's just MHO.
 

Wills Black 98

New Member
Dec 16, 2002
2,455
0
0
Western North Carolina
Jan 2, 2004
#5
  • Jan 2, 2004
  • #5
i like the FIPK, its expensive though... probably not even worth the money!
 

Wikkdgt

New Member
Jul 17, 2003
445
0
0
Cincinnati, OH
Jan 2, 2004
#6
  • Jan 2, 2004
  • #6
Just do this and save the money:

 
W

wht99gtconv

New Member
Dec 1, 2003
267
0
0
Jan 2, 2004
#7
  • Jan 2, 2004
  • #7
Get the K&N FIPK. You will fill the difference.
 

JetBrett

New Member
Mar 7, 2003
384
0
0
Sammamish, WA
Jan 2, 2004
#8
  • Jan 2, 2004
  • #8
I went from just a K&N without a silencer to the FIPK-II. Not much of a difference, if any. If you're just looking for something to do, I say go for it. Don't expect much from this mod though.
 
M

MUSTANGLANCE

Founding Member
May 7, 2002
179
0
0
Charleston, SC
Jan 3, 2004
#9
  • Jan 3, 2004
  • #9
I like my K&N FIPK Gen II. Had the MAC CAI and it sucked. At the track I can take out my headlight now and have ram air.
 

Bone Racing

New Member
Sep 7, 2003
1,075
0
0
Long Island, NY
Jan 3, 2004
#10
  • Jan 3, 2004
  • #10
c-l mad and the densecharger tbody tube here
wouldnt trade it in
 

JonJon

Founding Member
Aug 16, 2002
4,801
1
68
back in Marylands
Jan 3, 2004
#11
  • Jan 3, 2004
  • #11
OleGrayCar said:
Neither one.
Get yourself one of these instead..........
http://www.cnlperformance.com/80mm_96-01.html
Click to expand...
Don't get that either, I didn't notice a thing. Get a Pro-M after you get a bunch of mods then get a tune. I did run 13.7 with the MAF though... but it seems to be hit or miss.
 

OleGrayCar

Special Ed
Founding Member
Dec 28, 2001
1,116
0
0
pullin' that draft, fillin' up your rearview
Jan 3, 2004
#12
  • Jan 3, 2004
  • #12
JonJon said:
Don't get that either, I didn't notice a thing. Get a Pro-M after you get a bunch of mods then get a tune. I did run 13.7 with the MAF though... but it seems to be hit or miss.
Click to expand...

No offense, but I "missed" to the tune of a 13 RWHP increase over stock MAF (286 vs 299). And, if you ran the 13.7 after an MAF swap, I'm not so sure I understand the 'hit-or-miss" comment.
The 4-valvers (particularly the '01's for some reason) can get a noticeable kick in the pants from this mod. My tuner (Jerry from Fordchips.com, you might have heard of him) told me that Ford sets the A/F ratios pig-rich from the factory in order to avoid the "D" word. The C&L has a reputation for leaning that mix, hence the almost inevitable increases on the dyno. FWIW, the 4v's do seem to net greater increases, but that's kinda to be expected.
Obviously, everybody gets different #'s, even after performing identical mods..... but I think you can find an abundance of guys here who experienced similar results.

 
N

NewbStang

New Member
May 31, 2003
213
0
0
Jan 8, 2004
#13
  • Jan 8, 2004
  • #13
where did you buy your K&N FIPK II's???
 

Beau

Founding Member
Jan 29, 2000
3,050
0
0
San Diego
Jan 8, 2004
#14
  • Jan 8, 2004
  • #14
i got mine at JBA...but to be honest i didn't notice any difference when i put the FIPK on..it just looks sort of cool i guess
 

BullittStangV8

Founding Member
Oct 5, 2002
1,104
0
36
NJ
Jan 8, 2004
#15
  • Jan 8, 2004
  • #15
densecharger.
Mike
 
D

DarkShadowGT

Founding Member
Oct 16, 2002
177
0
16
Las Vegas, NV
Jan 8, 2004
#16
  • Jan 8, 2004
  • #16
i have a densecharger. honestly, its not all that. Probably ALL CAI are worthless. I keep mine on because i like to believe it does something. Plus it looks cool.
*DSGT
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

S
Engine 2003 Mach 1 Automatic Upgrades assistance
  • SJK1417M1AT
  • Sep 25, 2025
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Replies
3
Views
302
SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech Dec 21, 2025
01SVTvertt
0
K
Digital Tuning Going heads/cam/intake. Do I need a tune?
  • karhoot
  • May 11, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2 3
Replies
41
Views
588
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech May 14, 2026
karhoot
K
What's Your New Year Project Plans?
  • Habu135
  • Jan 1, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
18
Views
778
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jan 3, 2026
Habu135
G
Fox Tire Size for 16" Pony Wheels on 1984 LX Convertible
  • gw7
  • Jun 24, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
2
Views
117
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Saturday at 7:13 PM
Qtrhrse23
Q
Mustang II 4 cyl gear hunting and possibly messed up vacuum system
  • oesterreicher
  • May 31, 2026
  • 1974 - 1978 Mustang II Talk & Tech
Replies
11
Views
304
1974 - 1978 Mustang II Talk & Tech Jun 14, 2026
manicmechanic007
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?