• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech

Did 5 Lug/4 Disc Swap, Brakes Are Weak

  • Thread starter Thread starter Jason 302
  • Start date Start date Feb 3, 2016
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last

Jason 302

10 Year Member
Aug 9, 2003
685
71
68
Newark, Ohio
Feb 3, 2016
#1
  • Feb 3, 2016
  • #1
Finally did the 5 lug/4 wheel disc swap on my car. Used the following parts....

94/95 spindles
JM Stainless brake lines up front
99-04 PBR dual piston calipers up front
Gutted and plugged stock proportioning valve
Ford Racing adjustable proportioning valve
94/95 GT Master Cylinder
Stock fox vacuum booster
StopTech "Street" Pads up front
Brand new stock 94+ GT rotors on all four corners
McClure line lock kit
Moser 31spline 5 lug rear axles
Maximum Motorsports rear brake line adapter kit
94+ GT calipers in the rear
Ceramic rear pads
Proportioning valve turned in 4 turns in from all out

So far the brakes are extremely underwhelming, takes a TON of pedal pressure in order to stop the car in a hurry, and even then it's not doing so very well. The factory brakes did a better job, if that tells you anything. Do I need to give the StopTech pads some time to seat? Is the stock brake booster way too under powered for 4 wheel disc? Should I bypass the line lock kit, it worked fine with the old setup. Really disappointed thus far with the swap (other than the looks). Some pics for reference....







 

jrichker

StangNet's favorite TOOL
In Remembrance. Thank you for your contributions
Mar 10, 2000
27,512
2,813
234
Dublin GA
Feb 4, 2016
#2
  • Feb 4, 2016
  • #2
Is the pedal spongy or do the brakes pump up?
 

madspeed

Colonel Mustard
Founding Member
Nov 29, 1999
8,914
1,332
204
a van down by the river
Feb 4, 2016
#3
  • Feb 4, 2016
  • #3
was the master cylinder properly bech bled before install?
 
Reactions: stykthyn

elarm1

10 Year Member
Dec 17, 2010
1,428
652
154
N.Va
Feb 4, 2016
#4
  • Feb 4, 2016
  • #4
The problem is your STOCK booster. I just replaced mine with a Cobra unit. No more sponge brakes
 

Mustang5L5

That is…until I whipped out my Bissell
Mod Dude
Feb 18, 2001
43,260
17,944
224
Massachusetts
Feb 4, 2016
#5
  • Feb 4, 2016
  • #5
Your issue is due to incorrect MC/Booster.

Your brake setup came factory (on the 99-04 V6 Mustang w/vacuum assist brakes) with the larger booster and a 1" bore MC. By sticking with the stock fox booster and going with a 1 1/16" bore MC, you've created a situation where you need a LOT more pedal effort to stop.

The 94-95 GT MC is ideal only for the 66mm single piston calipers. The 99-04 calipers have slightly less surface area so your MC needs to be a bit smaller.

Long story short:

1993 Cobra 1" bore MC
94-95, 99-04 booster or 1993 Cobra booster
 
Last edited: Feb 16, 2016
Reactions: A5literMan, Shakerhood, Jason 302 and 1 other person

Jason 302

10 Year Member
Aug 9, 2003
685
71
68
Newark, Ohio
Feb 4, 2016
#6
  • Feb 4, 2016
  • #6
jrichker said:
Is the pedal spongy or do the brakes pump up?
Click to expand...

Pedal feels firm about half way down

madspeed said:
was the master cylinder properly bech bled before install?
Click to expand...

Yes

elarm1 said:
The problem is your STOCK booster. I just replaced mine with a Cobra unit. No more sponge brakes
Click to expand...

Thank you, I was considering that

Mustang5L5 said:
Your issue is due to incorrect MC/Booster.

Your brake setup came factory with the larger booster and a 1" bore MC. By sticking with the stock fox booster and going with a 1 1/16" bore MC, you've created a situation where you need a LOT more pedal effort to stop.

The 94-95 GT MC is ideal only for the 66mm single piston calipers. The 99-04 calipers have slightly less surface area so your MC needs to be a bit smaller.

Long story short:

1993 Cobra 1" bore MC
94-95, 99-04 booster or 1993 Cobra booster
Click to expand...

This is what I was afraid of. I knew 94/95 had single piston calipers, but I had already bought the master cylinder a few years back. I was hoping I could make it work. Looks like I need to spend some more $$$$
 

Jason 302

10 Year Member
Aug 9, 2003
685
71
68
Newark, Ohio
Feb 4, 2016
#7
  • Feb 4, 2016
  • #7
Thanks everyone for your replies. I'm going to order a 93 Cobra booster and M/C here next month and see where that gets me. I'll give an update and see how it works out.

BTW it's good to be back, I haven't been on here much the last several years, mustang took a back seat to motorcycle racing. All that nonsense is behind me now lol
 

jrichker

StangNet's favorite TOOL
In Remembrance. Thank you for your contributions
Mar 10, 2000
27,512
2,813
234
Dublin GA
Feb 4, 2016
#8
  • Feb 4, 2016
  • #8
Jason 302 said:
Thanks everyone for your replies. I'm going to order a 93 Cobra booster and M/C here next month and see where that gets me. I'll give an update and see how it works out.

BTW it's good to be back, I haven't been on here much the last several years, mustang took a back seat to motorcycle racing. All that nonsense is behind me now lol
Click to expand...
The love affair with keeping all the parts of your human body must have caught up with you again...
 
Reactions: 7991LXnSHO

2000xp8

SN Certified Technician
Aug 8, 2003
8,029
1,621
194
NJ
Feb 4, 2016
#9
  • Feb 4, 2016
  • #9
I ran similar brakes for years and they were just fine without the booster.
Only difference would be I used the 93 cobra MC.
 

elarm1

10 Year Member
Dec 17, 2010
1,428
652
154
N.Va
Feb 4, 2016
#10
  • Feb 4, 2016
  • #10
@2000xp8 i was cool with just puttinh around but the panic stops were down right dangerous for me. I almost rear ended my buddy on his bagger and then I vowed to fix them then

sent from my butt pocket
 

Jason 302

10 Year Member
Aug 9, 2003
685
71
68
Newark, Ohio
Feb 4, 2016
#11
  • Feb 4, 2016
  • #11
jrichker said:
The love affair with keeping all the parts of your human body must have caught up with you again...
Click to expand...

Never got hurt too bad luckily, just a concussion one time.

elarm1 said:
@2000xp8 i was cool with just puttinh around but the panic stops were down right dangerous for me. I almost rear ended my buddy on his bagger and then I vowed to fix them then

sent from my butt pocket
Click to expand...

That's how mine are, they don't feel too bad initially, and do the job for normal driving, but when it gets serious it gets scary.
 

90sickfox

Wasn't a pretty sight...and I've got big hands
SN Certified Technician
Mar 2, 2015
6,945
5,816
213
Feb 4, 2016
#12
  • Feb 4, 2016
  • #12
I took the booster MC and prop valve off a 98 v6 for my rear IRS and cobra front brakes. Works well.... Way better than stock.
 

Mustang5L5

That is…until I whipped out my Bissell
Mod Dude
Feb 18, 2001
43,260
17,944
224
Massachusetts
Feb 5, 2016
#13
  • Feb 5, 2016
  • #13
90sickfox said:
I took the booster MC and prop valve off a 98 v6 for my rear IRS and cobra front brakes. Works well.... Way better than stock.
Click to expand...

Same issue as OP though. That MC is 1/16" too large. While they may work great, they would work even better with the 1" bore MC.
 

Mustang5L5

That is…until I whipped out my Bissell
Mod Dude
Feb 18, 2001
43,260
17,944
224
Massachusetts
Feb 5, 2016
#14
  • Feb 5, 2016
  • #14
2000xp8 said:
I ran similar brakes for years and they were just fine without the booster.
Only difference would be I used the 93 cobra MC.
Click to expand...


I'd rank the MC more important than the booster. Some guys have big quad and can modulate the brakes well with the smaller boosters, but an MC bore reduction of 1/16" makes a huge difference in pedal feel.


If the OP was to pick one of the two changes I'd suggested only, it would be to do the MC first, and see how he likes it then. If still not enough power, then do the booster.

Ideally, I tend to recommend running as close to factory setup as possible...with a few exceptions here and there.
 

Gearbanger 101

Straight Outta Locash
20+ Year Stangneter
Aug 10, 2002
9,457
1,377
234
Ontario, Canada
Feb 5, 2016
#15
  • Feb 5, 2016
  • #15
Curious, would you guys recommend just the 1" MC if a person was simply doing the front brakes only and leaving the drum brakes in the rear?

I think I might make a partial brake upgrade part of my project this summer, but haven't sourced rear disc components yet.
 

Mustang5L5

That is…until I whipped out my Bissell
Mod Dude
Feb 18, 2001
43,260
17,944
224
Massachusetts
Feb 5, 2016
#16
  • Feb 5, 2016
  • #16
Gearbanger 101 said:
Curious, would you guys recommend just the 1" MC if a person was simply doing the front brakes only and leaving the drum brakes in the rear? .
Click to expand...

Depends on what the front brakes are. In general though you do not want to run a MC designed for 4 wheel disk brakes with rear drums. Rear cylinders don't need much fluid to operate, so swapping in a 4wdisk MC can leave you with a hard pedal. There really isn't an ideal MC for only swapping the fronts, and leaving the stock MC is usually the best solution.


The recommendations are based on mathematical ratios of the Master cylinder piston area vs the slave cylinder (calipers) piston area. There are engineering reasons for the recommendations I've made. I don't want anyone to think I just pick them out of a hat.

Refer to

http://www.stangnet.com/mustang-for...onversion-upgrade-thread.801400/#post-8075734
 
Last edited: Feb 5, 2016

Jason 302

10 Year Member
Aug 9, 2003
685
71
68
Newark, Ohio
Feb 5, 2016
#17
  • Feb 5, 2016
  • #17
Mustang5L5 said:
I'd rank the MC more important than the booster. Some guys have big quad and can modulate the brakes well with the smaller boosters, but an MC bore reduction of 1/16" makes a huge difference in pedal feel.


If the OP was to pick one of the two changes I'd suggested only, it would be to do the MC first, and see how he likes it then. If still not enough power, then do the booster.

Ideally, I tend to recommend running as close to factory setup as possible...with a few exceptions here and there.
Click to expand...

I'm probably just going to do both and be done with it. I wish I had the parts when I had it all tore apart the first time, but oh well.
 

mikestang63

SN Certified Technician
Aug 27, 2012
11,606
8,859
214
In the garage
Feb 5, 2016
#18
  • Feb 5, 2016
  • #18
I'd try the cobra MC first. I did my booster last year and i'm not that young or limber. It was a major PITA laying upside down under the dash to get that damn upper left bolt and the rod off the pedal.
 

Jason 302

10 Year Member
Aug 9, 2003
685
71
68
Newark, Ohio
Feb 5, 2016
#19
  • Feb 5, 2016
  • #19
mikestang63 said:
I'd try the cobra MC first. I did my booster last year and i'm not that young or limber. It was a major PITA laying upside down under the dash to get that damn upper left bolt and the rod off the pedal.
Click to expand...

Ratchet wrench make it any easier?
 

Grn92LX

Fidanza Man!
Founding Member
Jan 14, 2001
6,819
64
129
New York
Feb 6, 2016
#20
  • Feb 6, 2016
  • #20
^ thats how I installed mine.
 
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Brakes FOX BRAKES ISSUES
  • PonyGTrider
  • Jan 11, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2 3
Replies
53
Views
2K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Jan 31, 2026
Mustang5L5
8
87 lx 4cyl to v8 project 4 lug disc conversion questions
  • 87lx428
  • Mar 24, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
2
Views
512
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Mar 25, 2026
87lx428
8
W
New here, 1967 getting an efi 348 stroker.
  • Weeman348
  • Mar 27, 2026
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
0
Views
158
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Mar 27, 2026
Weeman348
W
F
5 lug disc brake pad help
  • Foxrider714
  • Nov 14, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
3
Views
241
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Nov 17, 2025
KRUISR
3
Brakes Front brakes sticking - 1988 5.0
  • 302Blue
  • Oct 18, 2024
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
7
Views
508
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Oct 19, 2024
ustacould
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?