• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech

Did Compression Test: Please analyze my results.

  • Thread starter Thread starter Grandmaster
  • Start date Start date Dec 25, 2003

Grandmaster

New Member
Dec 7, 2002
374
0
0
Monticello, Arkansas
Dec 25, 2003
#1
  • Dec 25, 2003
  • #1
EDIT: This is with a stock motor in my 93. No mods to the motor itself as far as i know.
Hey guys,
Well about 2 months ago i bought a compression tester from autozone and i've been putting it off and putting it off, so today (Christmas) i decided to stop being lazy and geterdone. Thats love right there, full compression test on Christmas day, with equal length headers

Here are the results:
#1: Quickly built up to 150, bro was watching the guage, said it took like 4 strokes then stayed around 150ish.
#2 Quickly built up to 145ish.
#3 same as number 2.
#4 3 strokes to 135, then onto 145 and stayed there.
#5 3 strokes to 125 then onto 145
#6 only climbed to about 125 over the seven strokes.
#7 the same
#8 Built quickly to 135 and hovered.

I dont know anything about what these numbers SHOULD be. Each cylinder was done with 7 strokes like the haynes manual said. Being Christmas, and being the pain it is to deal with the spark plug area with equal lengths, i didn't take the time to squirt oil in and recheck etc. ALSO: The haynes manual said to run the car to normal temp, which i did, before doing the test. But it took me so freaking long to get the plugs out and perform the test, by the time i got around to 5,6,7,8 the headers weren't even hot. Could this be why that side read low? Other than the motor not being at normal operating temperature, i cant think of anything i did wrong that might have altered the results. Are these numbers close to right? PLEASE analyze these the best you can and let me know what they mean and what i should do to fix them if they are wrong. THANKS!!!
 

Grandmaster

New Member
Dec 7, 2002
374
0
0
Monticello, Arkansas
Dec 25, 2003
#2
  • Dec 25, 2003
  • #2
oh btw the car runs GREAT, doesn't smoke or anything like that, runs terrific, i was just doing this to check up like for future reference before i decide to boost it or something.
 

JadeFalcon

Founding Member
Mar 28, 2002
1,924
0
0
Arlington, TX
Dec 25, 2003
#3
  • Dec 25, 2003
  • #3
Not too bad at all, around 140 is great for that motor, has about 120k on the ticker?
 

79'293stang

Active Member
Jan 5, 2003
505
11
29
Cedar Rapids, Iowa
Dec 25, 2003
#4
  • Dec 25, 2003
  • #4
sounds kind of low to me i had low compression dished pistons on my old engine and it made 170 plus or minus 10 all around
 

90mustangGT

I felt sorry for girls because
Founding Member
Jan 15, 2002
2,773
17
89
Dallas, GA
Dec 25, 2003
#5
  • Dec 25, 2003
  • #5
I think your right, the number's gradually dropped as the engine got cooler for the most part. I would have only pulled one plug at a time and let it run a little between each cylinder test. Even though the results you got were off a little, they were all within the 25% mark of each other. 70psi is the minimum compression required to combust the fuel-air mixture. Those numbers are quite good, I wouldn't worry about your engine too much. I wouldn't bother adding oil to the cylinders because that is only nessasarry when you get bad compression. If you did and added oil and the numbers went up it would be an indication of bad rings vs. just a valve or head gasket problem.
 

Grandmaster

New Member
Dec 7, 2002
374
0
0
Monticello, Arkansas
Dec 25, 2003
#6
  • Dec 25, 2003
  • #6
PHEW!!!
I cant thank you guys enough! <bows>
I would have only removed one at a time if i knew i could, the haynes manual said pull em all out lol. Doh, live and learn. Now that i know that i might recheck the 6,7,8 some time and make sure its at good temp, but not today or tomorrow, my arms hurt bad enough from scraping around as it is. Thanks a lot,
any more analysis is welcome.
-grand
EDIT: In reply to jadefalcon, i'm not sure how many miles. The odometer is in the 60s, but i've got 3.73s with a stock speedo gear and there's no telling how long its been like that. So yeah, 120k is possible, but there's no telling.
 

Fox Saleen 163

New Member
Dec 5, 2003
286
0
0
San Diego, CA
Dec 26, 2003
#7
  • Dec 26, 2003
  • #7
90mustangGT said:
I would have only pulled one plug at a time and let it run a little between each cylinder test.
Click to expand...

In order to do a proper compression check ALL plugs must be out of the engine. Also, the TB has to be wide open. I didn't know this either until I decided to read the directions that came with my compression gauge.
 
T

TheUser

Active Member
Jul 25, 2003
1,859
1
36
Springfield, MO
Dec 26, 2003
#8
  • Dec 26, 2003
  • #8
yeah, might not want the motor to start while doing the compression test lol...mine said to remove all plugs too
 

Fox Saleen 163

New Member
Dec 5, 2003
286
0
0
San Diego, CA
Dec 26, 2003
#9
  • Dec 26, 2003
  • #9
Well, you're also supposed to remove the coil wire. So if it still starts after that, you car is possesed.]
 

SR86

Founding Member
Dec 4, 2001
146
0
0
Alberta, canada
Dec 26, 2003
#10
  • Dec 26, 2003
  • #10
Did the car have a block heater? The block heater side will have lower compression, due to the block heater restricting coolant slightly, and that side running a few degrees warmer, letting the pistons expand a little more, and over the years, that causes more wear.. Not a big deal, and most people dont' notice it, but my engine builder pointed it out to me..
 
J

jerry beach

Founding Member
May 20, 2002
2,671
0
46
Ocala,FL
Dec 26, 2003
#11
  • Dec 26, 2003
  • #11
90mustangGT said:
I think your right, the number's gradually dropped as the engine got cooler for the most part. I would have only pulled one plug at a time and let it run a little between each cylinder test. Even though the results you got were off a little, they were all within the 25% mark of each other. 70psi is the minimum compression required to combust the fuel-air mixture. Those numbers are quite good, I wouldn't worry about your engine too much. I wouldn't bother adding oil to the cylinders because that is only nessasarry when you get bad compression. If you did and added oil and the numbers went up it would be an indication of bad rings vs. just a valve or head gasket problem.
Click to expand...

I have always heard the spec is within 10% on all cylinders. I have pulled plugs one at a time and started the engine each time. Netted the same results and didnt hurt anything. Mine were 165-175psi at 105,000mi.
 

Mavrick

Founding Member
Aug 29, 2002
2,264
0
46
Collingwood, ON
Dec 26, 2003
#12
  • Dec 26, 2003
  • #12
I have always heard/been told that aslong as your cylinders are around 20% within eachother, they are fine.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

D
Engine Questions on compression test results
  • dqureshi06
  • Jan 6, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
5
Views
389
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Jan 7, 2025
Noobz347
S
5.0 Rebuild
  • smittys7up
  • Nov 29, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
8
Views
527
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Dec 20, 2025
Noobz347
L
Engine Normal Leakdown Results (unstarted in nearly 2 years)
  • Lube
  • May 26, 2024
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
9
Views
1K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Jun 1, 2024
Blackhawkxx
M
Progress Thread mnky99 2001 V6 evap core, ac compressor, heater core replacement
  • mnky99
  • Sep 5, 2025
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
1
Views
459
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- Sep 5, 2025
mnky99
M
Engine Leakdown and Compression results
  • Mystang66
  • Oct 4, 2021
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
2
Views
1K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Oct 4, 2021
Mystang66
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?