• Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech

Difference in 67 289 heads and 77 302 heads?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Trent K.
  • Start date Start date Oct 29, 2019
T

Trent K.

Member
Oct 21, 2019
27
2
13
Hermann, MO
Oct 29, 2019
#1
  • Oct 29, 2019
  • #1
So I have a 77 302 that is going into my mustang, I've mentioned this before. I have the factory 289 that came out of the car, would I be better off putting the 289 heads on the 302 or should I leave the 302 heads on it? The 302 heads were obviously during the smog craze and they're out of an f100 from the time. I just want to know if anyone thinks it would be better to go with the 289 heads or not. I could probably get them ported and polished and make some better power with them. Would I see a power gain from switching to the 289 heads, since they're pre smog?
 
T

Trent K.

Member
Oct 21, 2019
27
2
13
Hermann, MO
Oct 29, 2019
#2
  • Oct 29, 2019
  • #2
I should clarify that both of these heads are 2v heads, and they'll both be stock more than likely. I don't have the money laying around to do anything with them at the moment, I was just wondering if I could get better performance out of the 289 heads over the 302 heads due to smog regulations.
 

Olivethefet

I will own your nuts! LOL
5 Year Member
May 17, 2018
2,596
1,790
143
Enterprise AL
Oct 29, 2019
#3
  • Oct 29, 2019
  • #3
I can't answer your question about the heads, but I am curious. What is wrong with the 289?
 

2Blue2

will be trying this sex one when I can find it
Mod Dude
Mar 5, 2019
4,430
2,893
163
Oahu
Oct 29, 2019
#4
  • Oct 29, 2019
  • #4
What yr casting makes a difference with older 289 heads having smaller chambers.

67 289 2v heads net about 9.3 compression in stock engine chamber volume about 63cc
77 302 2v heds net about 8.4 compression in stock engine chamber volume about 69cc

77 302 had a dished piston to help get lower compression

So yes 289 2v head might give slightly better performance than 77 2v head but not by enough to get really excited about or even notice

the stock head performance win goes to the 1993 to 97 gt 40 head
 
T

Trent K.

Member
Oct 21, 2019
27
2
13
Hermann, MO
Oct 30, 2019
#5
  • Oct 30, 2019
  • #5
Olivethefet said:
I can't answer your question about the heads, but I am curious. What is wrong with the 289?
Click to expand...
The 289 had low compression on about 4 of the cylinders. Bad piston rings and cam, and theres a small piece of crank that has a good groove in it so I just decided the 302 would be my best option.
 
Reactions: Olivethefet
T

Trent K.

Member
Oct 21, 2019
27
2
13
Hermann, MO
Oct 30, 2019
#6
  • Oct 30, 2019
  • #6
2Blue2 said:
What yr casting makes a difference with older 289 heads having smaller chambers.

67 289 2v heads net about 9.3 compression in stock engine chamber volume about 63cc
77 302 2v heds net about 8.4 compression in stock engine chamber volume about 69cc

77 302 had a dished piston to help get lower compression

So yes 289 2v head might give slightly better performance than 77 2v head but not by enough to get really excited about or even notice

the stock head performance win goes to the 1993 to 97 gt 40 head
Click to expand...
So is there a difference in the intake ports on the head? The engine is out of the car right now and I could replace heads fairly easily. Which heads would you pick? Looking for honest opinions on this.
 

Blue_Cheesehead

Member
Oct 30, 2019
9
4
13
Milwaukee
Oct 30, 2019
#7
  • Oct 30, 2019
  • #7
Are you sure the 289 heads were not contributing to the low compression? If the valves all seal fine, I would go with the 289 heads for a little more compression.

Any difference in intake ports will be insignificant.

Small block Ford's weak point is exhaust flow. Several hours with a Dremel tool can help by pocket porting the exhaust ports.
 

2Blue2

will be trying this sex one when I can find it
Mod Dude
Mar 5, 2019
4,430
2,893
163
Oahu
Oct 30, 2019
#8
  • Oct 30, 2019
  • #8
We are talking 45 to 50 yr old engines, are all the pushrods, rockers, studs still good if you go 289 route?
Again what yr casting on 289 what piston in 302 block?

For either head to be worth a it will need screw in studs, roller rockers, and mild porting

go buy aluminum
 

Blue_Cheesehead

Member
Oct 30, 2019
9
4
13
Milwaukee
Oct 30, 2019
#9
  • Oct 30, 2019
  • #9
^^^ to make the heads worth a darn, add guide plates to that list of modifications as well...
 
Reactions: 2Blue2
T

Trent K.

Member
Oct 21, 2019
27
2
13
Hermann, MO
Oct 31, 2019
#10
  • Oct 31, 2019
  • #10
2Blue2 said:
We are talking 45 to 50 yr old engines, are all the pushrods, rockers, studs still good if you go 289 route?
Again what yr casting on 289 what piston in 302 block?

For either head to be worth a it will need screw in studs, roller rockers, and mild porting

go buy aluminum
Click to expand...
Everything is good on the 289 heads. I'm not sure what pistons are in the 302 block as it has been bored .030 over. My grandpa did the rebuild a while ago, so it's hard for him to remember exactly what went into it. How much is the average porting job?
 

Blue_Cheesehead

Member
Oct 30, 2019
9
4
13
Milwaukee
Oct 31, 2019
#11
  • Oct 31, 2019
  • #11
^^^ If you have a Dremel tool you can spend $20 on supplies and 6 hours of time. There are plenty of videos and articles out there. Just don't go too nuts.
 
T

Trent K.

Member
Oct 21, 2019
27
2
13
Hermann, MO
Oct 31, 2019
#12
  • Oct 31, 2019
  • #12
Blue_Cheesehead said:
^^^ If you have a Dremel tool you can spend $20 on supplies and 6 hours of time. There are plenty of videos and articles out there. Just don't go too nuts.
Click to expand...
I'd rather have a machine shop do it lol I don't want to be the one to mess it up.
 

Blue_Cheesehead

Member
Oct 30, 2019
9
4
13
Milwaukee
Oct 31, 2019
#13
  • Oct 31, 2019
  • #13
For the money you would pay a machine shop, you could buy a better flowing set of aluminum heads.
 
T

Trent K.

Member
Oct 21, 2019
27
2
13
Hermann, MO
Oct 31, 2019
#14
  • Oct 31, 2019
  • #14
Blue_Cheesehead said:
For the money you would pay a machine shop, you could buy a better flowing set of aluminum heads.
Click to expand...
It would cost that much?!?!
 

Blue_Cheesehead

Member
Oct 30, 2019
9
4
13
Milwaukee
Oct 31, 2019
#15
  • Oct 31, 2019
  • #15
Time is money... There used to be a place called Powerheads where you could send your heads and for $1k they would cnc port them. Looks like inexpensive aluminum heads have put them out of business.

Spending $ on porting iron heads just does not make sense these days. You can get aluminum heads from places like Skip White for $750. Are they the best? No, but will out perform a stock head with average port job.
 
Last edited: Oct 31, 2019
Reactions: 2Blue2
R

rgsauger

Member
Aug 8, 2018
48
10
18
Houston
Nov 29, 2019
#16
  • Nov 29, 2019
  • #16
Check out the Brodix ST5.0 heads from summit. Damn these are nice heads!!! About $1200 for pair and they are READY!

Have them on a 65 289. Love them.
 

Attachments

  • IMG_1156.webp
    164.7 KB · Views: 367
  • IMG_1157.webp
    135.6 KB · Views: 315
R

rgsauger

Member
Aug 8, 2018
48
10
18
Houston
Nov 29, 2019
#17
  • Nov 29, 2019
  • #17
Remember the ARP bolts!
 

Billm

Member
Apr 16, 2014
48
5
19
Nov 30, 2019
#18
  • Nov 30, 2019
  • #18
Trent do a search for the Mustang Barn. They have a tech article on porting 289 heads. Cheap performance upgrade by opening up the exhaust. I did this to the engine in my Tiger and can't wait to start and break it in. I also have the C90z hydraulic cam. It's the hydraulic hypo cam. The owner Dan also will curve your your distributor to the proper specs. Another reasonable performance tip. A member on another Mustang forum got 320 hp. With this set up, using a 4 barrel carb and manifold. Bill
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

F
289 to 302 Engine
  • Fri Guy
  • Feb 13, 2025
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
4
Views
673
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Feb 13, 2025
Fri Guy
F
O
Sooty/Oily Front Engine & Pulleys
  • ozenator
  • Jun 15, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
12
Views
286
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jun 22, 2026
Blackhawkxx
Ford truck engine swap issues
  • keel
  • Jul 7, 2026
  • Other Auto Tech
Replies
17
Views
256
Other Auto Tech Jul 13, 2026
General karthief
S
Looking for input on Motor choice
  • stevedjarrell
  • May 28, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2 3
Replies
45
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Dec 15, 2025
Noobz347
5
Hello fellow Mustang fanatics.
  • 580HP*428Cj
  • Apr 2, 2026
  • The Welcome Wagon
Replies
2
Views
200
The Welcome Wagon Apr 2, 2026
General karthief
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?