• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech

Difference in FMS "B" and "C" springs?

  • Thread starter Thread starter 94tang
  • Start date Start date May 5, 2004

94tang

20+ Year Stangneter
Aug 24, 2003
297
4
19
East TN
May 5, 2004
#1
  • May 5, 2004
  • #1
Ride quality?....Actual drop?....."C"springs are progressive right?
 

S/CBlack95GT

New Member
Apr 6, 2003
2,018
0
0
Tampa Palms, FL
May 5, 2004
#2
  • May 5, 2004
  • #2
The Cs are a non-progressive 650lb. only spring. The Bs are exact to the Cs except the Bs are a progressive 425/565, which means they are not as stiff, but will ride better. Both drop the car the same.
 

94tang

20+ Year Stangneter
Aug 24, 2003
297
4
19
East TN
May 5, 2004
#3
  • May 5, 2004
  • #3
thanks for the info......
 

Imyourzero

Learned that lesson as a horny teenager with lots
Founding Member
Mar 10, 2002
2,298
0
0
Hoonose, U.S.A. Posts: 39,051
May 5, 2004
#4
  • May 5, 2004
  • #4
I just ordered a set of H&R springs for my car. Are they progressive? I've got lowering springs on my car now, but they came on there so I don't know which brand they are or how much the car is lowered...but I do know the ride quality blows. I was going to go with Steeda or Eibach but everybody kept recommending H&R so I went with them. Hope I'm happy with the results!
 

DougNuts

Founding Member
Jul 11, 2000
2,596
0
47
Georgetown Ky
May 5, 2004
#5
  • May 5, 2004
  • #5
Spring rates for the Bs
Front 425/530, Rear 200/300

Spring rates for the Cs
Front 650, Rear 200/300
 
9

95.0Stang

Member
Feb 20, 2003
538
1
18
Kansas
May 5, 2004
#6
  • May 5, 2004
  • #6
I have the C-springs and I really like them, you will not feel every little bump like I did with Eibachs. I highly recommend the C-spring, actual drop was closer to 1.5 inches all the way around. They claim they are not progressive, but a week later I could see a slight difference. Handling is great, alot better, and that is with stock susp...can't wait to do shocks/struts, LCA and UCAs!!!
 

S/CBlack95GT

New Member
Apr 6, 2003
2,018
0
0
Tampa Palms, FL
May 5, 2004
#7
  • May 5, 2004
  • #7
Progressive just means that the spring has a variable rate. For example, a progressive 425/535 spring is rated at 425lbs for the first inch of compression then 535lbs once the spring is compressed past one inch.
 

DougNuts

Founding Member
Jul 11, 2000
2,596
0
47
Georgetown Ky
May 5, 2004
#8
  • May 5, 2004
  • #8
S/CBlack95GT said:
Progressive just means that the spring has a variable rate. For example, a progressive 425/535 spring is rated at 425lbs for the first inch of compression then 535lbs once the spring is compressed past one inch.
Click to expand...

Close, I found this definition online to explain it better.

Progressive-rate spring- A spring with an increasing spring constant. For example, if the first inch of spring motion requires 425 pounds of force, the second inch would require more than an additional 425 pounds, and the third inch would require still more. Progressive-rate springs become stiffer as they are compressed, unlike single-rate springs, which have a fixed spring rate.

the numbers were changed to fit the example better
 

Mrgreen94gt

SIMMA DA NA!!!
Founding Member
Jul 16, 2002
448
0
0
West TN
May 5, 2004
#9
  • May 5, 2004
  • #9
I've had both on my car, B's first and now C's. I greatly prefer the C springs. The B's made the car feel almost soggy yet harsh. The C's, in concert with 03 Cobra Bilsteins, seem to offer a much more solid feel all around.

Also, with the B springs, -1.4 degrees of camber was a positive as I could get it. With the C's, I have it at -0.6, but I have a full range of adjustment.
 

S/CBlack95GT

New Member
Apr 6, 2003
2,018
0
0
Tampa Palms, FL
May 5, 2004
#10
  • May 5, 2004
  • #10
Mrgreen94gt said:
Also, with the B springs, -1.4 degrees of camber was a positive as I could get it. With the C's, I have it at -0.6, but I have a full range of adjustment.
Click to expand...

Thats odd. With my Bs and MM C/C plates I could move mine from about 0 degrees to a negative 1.5, with the plates in the positive orientation. With the plates swapped side to side and in the negative orientation they will move from a negative 1.0 to a negative 2.5 degrees.
 

Mrgreen94gt

SIMMA DA NA!!!
Founding Member
Jul 16, 2002
448
0
0
West TN
May 5, 2004
#11
  • May 5, 2004
  • #11
S/CBlack95GT said:
Thats odd. With my Bs and MM C/C plates I could move mine from about 0 degrees to a negative 1.5, with the plates in the positive orientation. With the plates swapped side to side and in the negative orientation they will move from a negative 1.0 to a negative 2.5 degrees.
Click to expand...

I guess it all comes down to variation among cars and mine being a convt. might have something to do with it. There may have been some plate installation issues as well, the first time around.

I don't think the fact that you have M/M plates and I have the Pro3i ones would make much difference in this area, but it may.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

N
Fox Street Suspension Build Advice
  • NYFox
  • Jan 25, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
3
Views
312
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jan 28, 2026
Noobz347
Suspension Harsh Ride
  • PonyGTrider
  • Mar 20, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2 3 4
Replies
62
Views
2K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Apr 11, 2026
Noobz347
F
For Sale 03 Redfire Cobra Convertible
  • FastFox5oh
  • Tuesday at 4:34 AM
  • SN95 Mustangs For Sale (1994-04)
Replies
0
Views
39
SN95 Mustangs For Sale (1994-04) Tuesday at 4:34 AM
FastFox5oh
F
X
Free VE Table Corrections — Drop Your MSQ and a Datalog, I'll Do the Rest
  • X-cam34
  • Apr 12, 2026
  • Digital Self-tuning Forum
Replies
16
Views
594
Digital Self-tuning Forum Jul 7, 2026
X-cam34
X
T
Resolved 1990 GT Convertible - Very clunky ride!
  • Tom77
  • Feb 24, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2 3
Replies
50
Views
2K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Aug 21, 2025
Tom77
T
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?