• Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech

Differences between subframe connectors

  • Thread starter Thread starter Gatorman1369
  • Start date Start date Jan 14, 2004
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
First Prev 2 of 2

hognutz

New Member
Nov 12, 2002
1,940
0
0
albany, oregon
Jan 20, 2004
#21
  • Jan 20, 2004
  • #21
NasaGT said:
As Hoppy described, the tubular gives you better torsional strength. But some tubular subframes are not jackable. That was what swayed me to the rectangular MMs. Space is tight under there, I wanted to be able to use them as jack locations.

Good luck!
Click to expand...

this is why I recomended the global west. they are tubular and jackable. I have not purchased them yet but they seemed to be the way to go on paper to me.
 
C

CottonBurnerz

Banned
May 10, 2003
1,554
0
0
Drink and Drive = Teh Lose
Jan 20, 2004
#22
  • Jan 20, 2004
  • #22
Hoppy I checked out your pics and I felt sorry for you and the magnaflow X pipe
 

bird

Founding Member
Dec 27, 2001
342
0
0
Garden City, NY
Jan 20, 2004
#23
  • Jan 20, 2004
  • #23
Hoppy Posted
Go tubular, as they offer all the support of the rectangular one but offer additional torsional rigidity (what shape stock do roll bars/cages come in?).
Click to expand...

This is true. But here is where I believe the GW kit falls short. The mounting points on the GW sub-frame connectors to the chassis of the car looks to be only 4 inches long. I have at least a good 6 inches on each side (12 Inches of weld on each end of the sub-frame connector) where my sub frames connector contact the chassis.

And the thing about connecting the seat to the sub-frame connector? Do you really want to do that? Think about it. God forbid for some reason the sub-frame connector is ripped off while driving the car. You want your seat tied to that. And if you feel you are going to be driving that fast that the seats might rip through the floor boards for what ever reasons that might cause that to happen, then it is time to get a roll bar installed were the seat mounting points are tied into the roll bar because you are driving to fast not to have one.

Rob
 

85MustGT

Founding Member
Nov 8, 2001
95
0
16
Occupied San Diego
Jan 20, 2004
#24
  • Jan 20, 2004
  • #24
Seat Braces -

I also have a 1985 Mustang GT, it seems the Fox bodied Mustangs had a big problem with the floor pan tearing due to the lack of bracing on the rear mounts of the front seats, hence the braces on some brands of SFCs.

Do the SN-95 bodied Mustangs have the same problem?

Mark
 

bird

Founding Member
Dec 27, 2001
342
0
0
Garden City, NY
Jan 20, 2004
#25
  • Jan 20, 2004
  • #25
85MustGT said:
Seat Braces -

I also have a 1985 Mustang GT, it seems the Fox bodied Mustangs had a big problem with the floor pan tearing due to the lack of bracing on the rear mounts of the front seats, hence the braces on some brands of SFCs.

Do the SN-95 bodied Mustangs have the same problem?

Mark
Click to expand...

From what I have learned and seen on other peoples cars, no. I understand why they came out with the seat brace on sub-sub frame connectors. But IMO it's a bandaid. The two reasons why these floor pans are tearing are

1) To much power

2) Beating the snot out of the car

Both will cause to floor pans to flex and start to tear.

Rob
 

85MustGT

Founding Member
Nov 8, 2001
95
0
16
Occupied San Diego
Jan 20, 2004
#26
  • Jan 20, 2004
  • #26
Maybe the previous owner was real fat!

 

FastRedPonyCar

Founding Member
Apr 7, 2002
1,678
4
39
I pee sitting down...or do I?
Jan 20, 2004
#27
  • Jan 20, 2004
  • #27
Griggs and Maxiumm motorsports are the best. I think steeda played catch up but I've got the Griggs full length ones and they are awesome. $90 too
 

FastRedPonyCar

Founding Member
Apr 7, 2002
1,678
4
39
I pee sitting down...or do I?
Jan 20, 2004
#28
  • Jan 20, 2004
  • #28
85MustGT said:
... it seems the Fox bodied Mustangs had a big problem with the floor pan tearing due to the lack of bracing on the rear mounts of the front seats...
Click to expand...

The floor pan can also tear out if you run too much nawz. You'd be lucky if you don't blow the welds on the intake manifold too. Just make sure you don't granny shift and that you double clutch like you should and your floor pans will be fine.
 

BadMoFo

I will sleep with a Mod for a CT
Founding Member
Sep 28, 2001
2,911
0
0
New Bern NC
Jan 20, 2004
#29
  • Jan 20, 2004
  • #29
I have never heard or the floor pans ripping out. thats a new one on me. but as for the length I have heard that the full length are the best and thats what I plan to get. I had regular length kenny browns on my 00 gt and it was one of the most noticable mods I did. they are next on my list.
 
H

Hoppy

Founding Member
Jun 24, 2002
329
0
0
L.A. CA
Jan 21, 2004
#30
  • Jan 21, 2004
  • #30
CottonBurnerz said:
Hoppy I checked out your pics and I felt sorry for you and the magnaflow X pipe
Click to expand...

Man if that aint a lesson in "ya get what ya pay for" I don't know what is!!!!
 

jadesville

the polarbear conservation corps protects a polarb
20+ Year Stangneter
Oct 8, 2003
2,189
0
47
Gresham, OR
Jan 21, 2004
#31
  • Jan 21, 2004
  • #31
BadMoFo said:
I have never heard or the floor pans ripping out.
Click to expand...

same here
 

NasaGT

Founding Member
Sep 19, 2002
1,993
2
49
Virginia
Jan 21, 2004
#32
  • Jan 21, 2004
  • #32
BadMoFo said:
I have never heard or the floor pans ripping out.
Click to expand...

I have. I think its more of a problem on the fox body verts, but its also happened to coupes with lots of track time and no subframes.
 

Sam98

Founding Member
Mar 15, 2002
1,625
1
0
Albuquerque, NM
Jan 21, 2004
#33
  • Jan 21, 2004
  • #33
FastRedPonyCar said:
The floor pan can also tear out if you run too much nawz. You'd be lucky if you don't blow the welds on the intake manifold too. Just make sure you don't granny shift and that you double clutch like you should and your floor pans will be fine.
Click to expand...



Double clutching hasn't been necessary since the advent of synchronized transmissions...roughly 40 years ago.
 

FastRedPonyCar

Founding Member
Apr 7, 2002
1,678
4
39
I pee sitting down...or do I?
Jan 21, 2004
#34
  • Jan 21, 2004
  • #34
hey, if I did't already have the sfc's that i've got now, i'd definately have bought the cross brace sfc's from evolution motorsports. $275 sounds steep but you get a free driveshaft safety loop out of it as well as knowing that the frame connectors allow clearance for a side exhaust. Also, judging from the quality of the radiator closure brace, the quality of their products is outstanding and the customer service is out of this world.

http://www.evolutionmsport.com/evm-Product-xfw.html

 

apk1971

New Member
Jul 28, 2003
133
0
0
Upstate NY
Jan 22, 2004
#35
  • Jan 22, 2004
  • #35
Anybody use the Kenny Brown Double Cross Sub Frame Connectors?

I have a 2003 vert and was looking to add the KB Chassis Support Kit which includes: Super Sub-Frame Connectors, Heavy Duty Strut Tower Brace designed to clear oversized Intakes, and lower Chassis Brace.

http://kennybrown.com/cgi-bin/ecomm...36558.56602*OT7532&product=1999-2004MustangGT
 

DBMSTNG

I fantasize about it being BIG!
Founding Member
Apr 23, 2002
2,120
0
56
not quite here
Jan 22, 2004
#36
  • Jan 22, 2004
  • #36
can you MM SFC guys tell me where you got your SFC's? and at what prices? thanks.
 
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
First Prev 2 of 2
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

  • Locked
Expired 01 Cobra Fully Built 5.0 Stroker Socal
  • Doc Hawk
  • Feb 18, 2016
  • SN95 Mustangs For Sale (1994-04)
Replies
0
Views
3K
SN95 Mustangs For Sale (1994-04) Feb 18, 2016
Doc Hawk
C
  • Locked
Steeda Subframe Connectors, Zinc plated, NEW 555-5245
  • clarkjr
  • Sep 24, 2011
  • Suspension Parts
Replies
1
Views
2K
Suspension Parts Sep 30, 2011
clarkjr
C
Pics - Before and After V2 install etc
  • screamin gt
  • Apr 26, 2011
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
12
Views
4K
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- Apr 27, 2011
Dark04GT
D
Will these subframe connectors do the job? How does this gear install sound?
  • dstang01
  • May 27, 2008
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Replies
2
Views
958
1994 - 1995 Specific Tech May 28, 2008
toyman
T
Building my 2 valve.. have a few questions..
  • Trav4011
  • May 27, 2007
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Replies
2
Views
623
SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech May 27, 2007
TweekedGT
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?