• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech

Disapointing 1/4 mile ET

  • Thread starter Thread starter Flip888
  • Start date Start date Sep 27, 2005
F

Flip888

New Member
Aug 11, 2005
8
0
0
near Seattle
Sep 27, 2005
#1
  • Sep 27, 2005
  • #1
I went to the track for the first time since i baught my '90 GT and was pretty dissapointed. I baught the car from the previous owner who had it for his project car and he did a good amount of drivetrain/engine work to it. Its got high compression forged pistons, forged rods/crank, 255lhp, built AOD with manual valvebody, 32mm fuel injectors, E303,and solid motor mounts. thats all i can think of right now that he did but i installed e/h/i, 4.10's subframe connectors, and lower controll arms (and a few things i dont remenber).

So anyways i was at the track and i ran a best of 13.4 out of 3 runs (the other 2 were 13.5) which was a lot slower than i was hoping for, i thought i would at least get high 12/s. My 60 ft was about 2.3 sec on my best run and i was spinning a lot since i got stock tires still. I cant rember my mph but it might have 110 or 113 or something, might have been a little higher.

The main question i had though, is how much a high stall converter and slicks would help my 1/4 mile times. I started researching racing slicks and have learned a lot. I never liked the idea of using slicks before because i didnt like the drivetrain wear i thought they added but I understand them better now and im going to buy some that fit my rims in a day or 2.

And im guessing with the added traction Ill also need a high stall converter. I have a 1500 right now and i spin the stock tires like crazy, but with the slicks i think i can go with a 2800 stall since my power comes on hard a about 3000 and i think it would be high enough to launch good but not break loose.


Im open to opinions about my setup (after the stall and slicks i have no idea what my next mods will be), and if you guys could possably estimate where the new stall converter and slicks would put me in the 1/4 mile i would definently appreciate it.

Thanks
 

thumper460

Founding Member
Jul 24, 2000
3,022
2
56
Orange Park , Fl
Sep 27, 2005
#2
  • Sep 27, 2005
  • #2
Dont be bummed on the car... 13.4 with a 2.3 60ft is good!! why?? well if you drop just .3 off your 60 ft.. and all the rest is the same.. your busting 12.80's!! Get that 60 into the 1.7s and your in the low 12.20s...

Drag racing is MORE than a BIG powerfull engine!! Get the suspension working WITH tires and you'll be happy!! cool??

Just me......................

Thumper
 
D

davs5.0

Founding Member
Jul 10, 2002
921
0
0
windsor,ontario,canada
Sep 27, 2005
#3
  • Sep 27, 2005
  • #3
youo've got all kinds of power just get it hooked up. Slicks are a must with that much of a modded engine if you want to get any decent times. I'd look into an Edge racing 3000 stall converter. I'm running 12.35 with 107 mph. Like Thumper said, traction is all important. Don't be suprised if your mph drops with slicks, you won't be getting as much of a running start at the track as you do spinning the tires.
 

mob

the guy who hits on his mom
20+ Year Stangneter
Oct 3, 2003
2,566
136
104
Dallas, TX
Sep 27, 2005
#4
  • Sep 27, 2005
  • #4
id say get some strange adjustable shocks and struts so you can have the track setting, get some drag springs like eibach and, dr's or slicks, and you will be in the 12's no doubt, i think your et and mph are VERy good for that 60', just need to spend alittle more money on the suspension good luck
 

The Fox

New Member
Mar 30, 2005
354
0
0
Port Elizabeth
Sep 27, 2005
#5
  • Sep 27, 2005
  • #5
Eibach drag springs dont look pretty IMO. Just got em on my car and the back looks like 4 cyl springs and the front looks like mack truck springs. My front raised 2 inches and rear stayed the same (I had 4 cyl springs) and I dont even have aluminum heads yet (50lbs less) Oh yeah BTW your time is great, I agree with everyone here. As soon as you get a little better traction you'll be set!
 

Paul Perreca

New Member
Mar 30, 2005
1,085
0
0
Sep 27, 2005
#6
  • Sep 27, 2005
  • #6
w/ those mph's, your car is a mid 12 second car
paul perreca
 
F

Flip888

New Member
Aug 11, 2005
8
0
0
near Seattle
Sep 27, 2005
#7
  • Sep 27, 2005
  • #7
Thats awesome to hear, what you guys said made me a lot happier. When i baught the car my goal was to hit mid 12's n/a (then 11's with a blower) so it will be awesome next time i goto the track fully prepaired.

Im really excited about buying the stall converter, tires and suspension now. I can only affoard one at a time right now though (saving up for school) so im planning to get slicks first, then i was thinking of getting the suspension, or would it be better to get the stall converter 2nd then suspension 3rd?
 

maverick0716

Founding Member
Jan 12, 2002
3,924
0
56
Chilliwack, BC, Canada
Sep 27, 2005
#8
  • Sep 27, 2005
  • #8
You can't expect to be in the 12's with no traction. You'll notice a huge improvement with slicks.
 

N8Miller

I need NOS....make it 2 of the big ones
Founding Member
Jul 26, 2000
2,661
0
0
Kingston, PA, USA
Sep 27, 2005
#9
  • Sep 27, 2005
  • #9
welcome to my club, buddy.

3 weeks ago at the track: 13.3 @ 108 mph (2.05 60'). i wanted to sell it when i looked at the time slip.... but i think that getting an 11.xx slip would be worth it .... on motor of course.

be patient... it will happen.
 

rd

Founding Member
Jan 12, 2000
3,316
63
109
Ocean Springs MS
Sep 27, 2005
#10
  • Sep 27, 2005
  • #10
Been there, done that.

Step one is get traction, I would recommend BFG Drag Radials.

Then get a converter, say a 2600-3000 rpm stall, if you can.

I got the converter first, and lost 2 tenths to tire spin.

Got the DR's and got 6 tenths better instantly. That sixty foot should go to 1.8 or so easily.
 
I

IntenseBlue

Member
Jul 10, 2005
946
0
16
Sep 27, 2005
#11
  • Sep 27, 2005
  • #11
1. Slicks
2. Stall
3. Suspension
 

90mustangGT

I felt sorry for girls because
Founding Member
Jan 15, 2002
2,773
17
89
Dallas, GA
Sep 27, 2005
#12
  • Sep 27, 2005
  • #12
Your problem is definatly getting the power to the ground. 1500stall? Isn't that close to stock? The only problem with slicks is your probally going to bog the motor witht the increased traction, it might just reverse the advantages of the traction. I have seen it many times before. A good stall should be in the same shopping kart as some slicks.
 

willys1

Active Member
Dec 2, 2003
1,004
1
36
New Jersey
Sep 27, 2005
#13
  • Sep 27, 2005
  • #13
go for the cheapest thing first,get some DR's or slicks!! Just the addition of those will put you well into the 12's
 

willys1

Active Member
Dec 2, 2003
1,004
1
36
New Jersey
Sep 27, 2005
#14
  • Sep 27, 2005
  • #14
90mustangGT said:
Your problem is definatly getting the power to the ground. 1500stall? Isn't that close to stock? The only problem with slicks is your probally going to bog the motor witht the increased traction, it might just reverse the advantages of the traction. I have seen it many times before. A good stall should be in the same shopping kart as some slicks.
Click to expand...
I think 1800 is stock,,the addition of a stall(my vote is for a 3000) without traction first will give you slower ET's!!
 

QDRHRSE

New Member
Dec 31, 2002
1,590
0
0
Palmdale, CA
Sep 27, 2005
#15
  • Sep 27, 2005
  • #15
If what he's saying is true he doesn't need a stall to get waaaayyy into the 12's- he needs some tire and a traction device....maybe some other suspension mods too.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

C
C4 trans help needed
  • CPH89LX
  • Apr 26, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
6
Views
172
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Apr 28, 2026
CPH89LX
C
Hard to start when engine is cold
  • 86_Capri
  • Mar 11, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
32
Views
884
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jun 21, 2026
CAMTWO1070
S
Fox '87 GT can't get to stay running
  • spilly
  • Mar 29, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
27
Views
683
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jun 20, 2026
spilly
S
Engine My Gates K060845 (85 1/4”) belt doesn’t fit
  • Mcmahst
  • Jun 26, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
17
Views
524
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Jun 27, 2025
Mcmahst
K
3.8 T5 & Bellhousing to 1987 Lincoln 5.0
  • ks65stang
  • Mar 2, 2026
  • Other Auto Tech
Replies
3
Views
280
Other Auto Tech Mar 3, 2026
Noobz347
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?