• Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech

Distant Future Kenne Bell Plans

  • Thread starter Thread starter brtnstrns
  • Start date Start date Jan 3, 2012

brtnstrns

Member
Dec 19, 2003
606
11
19
Lewisville, TX
Jan 3, 2012
#1
  • Jan 3, 2012
  • #1
Now that I've acquired a beater (very low mileage 95 toyota camry), I've decided to change my 99 GT from my daily driver to my (driveable) project car. The engine is completely stock and currently has about 123k miles on it and will continue to have miles added to it. I'd like to save up and eventually strap a Kenne Bell on and attempt to make horsepower in the mid to high 400s at the wheels. I know the internals need some work before making over 400 HP and that it might not even be a good idea to put a supercharger on an engine with miles that high (and even more-so if this is 1 1/2 to 2 years away).

So exactly what steps should I take in preparing for this plan? Lower mileage block? Rebuild of current block? Exactly what internals would I need to upgrade? I would say I'm pretty mechanically inclined as I do all the work on my cars and am an engineer, but honestly have never taken an engine block down to the bare bones.

Please don't let this get into a cost debate (buying a cobra blah blah). I own this car flat out and am considering it a restoration project.

Thanks in advance for the advice. I know there are various pieces of info on this subject on the forums but haven't seen much in high mileage motors and specifics for forged internals and what not.
 

trinity_gt

10 Year Member
Jan 31, 2003
3,125
81
99
Canada
Jan 3, 2012
#2
  • Jan 3, 2012
  • #2
For high 400s you're going to want forged rods and pistons and perhaps 12-14 psi.

I'd use your current block. Bore it 0.020" (will help unshroud the valves a tad) and get some 18cc forged slugs (e.g. Manley MAN-594220C-8), rings (e.g. Manley MAN-46620-8) and H-beams (e.g. Manley 14042-8). Get a Cobra oil pump and pickup to round out a stout shortblock.

Stock heads and cams will be fine. Cometic gaskets, ARP studs for the mains and heads.
 

brtnstrns

Member
Dec 19, 2003
606
11
19
Lewisville, TX
Jan 4, 2012
#3
  • Jan 4, 2012
  • #3
Well that was simple. I appreciate all the info! Is there anything I should plan to do to the drivetrain to make sure that it would not get destroyed?

Any other input?
 

trinity_gt

10 Year Member
Jan 31, 2003
3,125
81
99
Canada
Jan 4, 2012
#4
  • Jan 4, 2012
  • #4
A T-45 might be questionable behind that sort of torque if you get traction

Consider a King Cobra 10.5" clutch...

3.73s would be a good gearset - I like them in mine.
 

Bob Hughes

Member
Dec 26, 2011
349
17
19
Southamptonl, NJ
Jan 4, 2012
#5
  • Jan 4, 2012
  • #5
I too actually had kind of the same questions. My car is a babied 03 GT convertible with 60000. It's just not fast enough for me and no offense to the owners but I'm no fan of the '10+ cars I don't like the body lines. I was looking at the 2.1L kenne belle kit and it says produces 400hp and shouldn't need new internals......any take on their claims....does anyone run that setup?
 
D

darkside03gt

Member
Feb 19, 2007
851
8
18
Sacramento CA
Jan 4, 2012
#6
  • Jan 4, 2012
  • #6
Been running the 2.1 with 8lbs of boost for 2 years and about 7,000 miles (When I do drive it I am not all to nice) without an issue. Calculating drive train loss I am right at about 400 fly wheel HP. When it comes to a power adder the tune is everything. When it comes to a twin screw some tuners have become more conservitive and are now running less timing. My tuner runs less then most because of Californias crappy 91. I wouldn't drive the car on KB's tune anywhere but to the dyno to at least have it checked out before you get on it.
 

vertigasen

Active Member
Apr 28, 2004
366
18
29
Falcon, CO
Jan 4, 2012
#7
  • Jan 4, 2012
  • #7
If you go with their stock 2.1 kit, you will get anywhere from 380 and up with their tune....a good dyno tune will get you near that 400 mark. The KB tune is ok.....very conservative. You won't need new internals at the 400 mark. There are probably more people than I can count that are running a 2.1 on their stock engine. I didnt put my KB on until the 90k mark. I would have been fine if it wasnt for a screw up.

I made some good numbers with my KB, but, end the end, I went a different route.
 

Bob Hughes

Member
Dec 26, 2011
349
17
19
Southamptonl, NJ
Jan 5, 2012
#8
  • Jan 5, 2012
  • #8
Thanks for the info. I've been doing my homework but have never owned a forced induction vehicle before
 

72 fastback

Member
Apr 4, 2006
146
3
19
Hamden Ct
Jan 5, 2012
#9
  • Jan 5, 2012
  • #9
I been running a kb 2.1 intercooled with my 02 gt conv. The car has 85000 miles on it know and everthing is bone stock other than a kn drop in. It even has the stock exhaust. I been running the kb tune for about a year with the 3 1/4 " pulley and usually gets 9 to 10 psi, even more in this frigid new england weather which worries me at times. You'll love the instant power when you so much as look at the gas pedal.
 
D

darkside03gt

Member
Feb 19, 2007
851
8
18
Sacramento CA
Jan 5, 2012
#10
  • Jan 5, 2012
  • #10
Bob Hughes said:
Thanks for the info. I've been doing my homework but have never owned a forced induction vehicle before
Click to expand...

Once you add boost you will never want to go back especially with a twin screw. The power is instant and makes it very easy to scare people who have never been in a fast car.
 

Bob Hughes

Member
Dec 26, 2011
349
17
19
Southamptonl, NJ
Jan 5, 2012
#11
  • Jan 5, 2012
  • #11
I've been weighing my options and the twin screw seemed like the best route. The lower k member support on the convertible makes a turbo less likely option and I would imagine that it creates a ton more heat than a blower.
 

Bob Hughes

Member
Dec 26, 2011
349
17
19
Southamptonl, NJ
Jan 11, 2012
#12
  • Jan 11, 2012
  • #12
So I do have a question to the other KB owners out there, is the intercooled version worth the extra $1000??? I havent really read about it entirely yet, but I would love a little insight....
 

Noobz347

Stangnet Facilities Maint Tech... Er... Janitor
Admin Dude
Jan 4, 1985
42,932
21,109
234
Box behind Walmart
Jan 11, 2012
#13
  • Jan 11, 2012
  • #13
Yes
 

trinity_gt

10 Year Member
Jan 31, 2003
3,125
81
99
Canada
Jan 11, 2012
#14
  • Jan 11, 2012
  • #14
Bob Hughes said:
So I do have a question to the other KB owners out there, is the intercooled version worth the extra $1000??? I havent really read about it entirely yet, but I would love a little insight....
Click to expand...

Yes. The additional boost you can safely run makes it worthwhile.
 
D

darkside03gt

Member
Feb 19, 2007
851
8
18
Sacramento CA
Jan 11, 2012
#15
  • Jan 11, 2012
  • #15
Bob Hughes said:
So I do have a question to the other KB owners out there, is the intercooled version worth the extra $1000??? I havent really read about it entirely yet, but I would love a little insight....
Click to expand...

Yes. You can't run more then about 7lbs of boost without one because the IAT's will be through the roof. The other things you want to consider is that if you don't get the intercooled kit then 1 it will cost you more to upgrade later 2 when you upgrade later then you are pretty much doing the install of the blower twice.
 

72 fastback

Member
Apr 4, 2006
146
3
19
Hamden Ct
Jan 12, 2012
#16
  • Jan 12, 2012
  • #16
The shop that installed my kenne bell had three customers prior to me. Each one of them went non-intercooled then wasn't happy had there blowers removed an intercooler installed. You will be able to cook eggs on top of it in the summer.
 

Bob Hughes

Member
Dec 26, 2011
349
17
19
Southamptonl, NJ
Jan 12, 2012
#17
  • Jan 12, 2012
  • #17
Ok thanks for the help everyone
 

GDawg

Founding Member
Mar 22, 2002
1,469
19
68
Nevada
Jan 12, 2012
#18
  • Jan 12, 2012
  • #18
True dat about cooking eggs on it if it isn't intercooled. Don't be cheap with your blower.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

J
Help Figuring Motor Choice(Possible future turbo)?
  • jaygee15
  • Dec 14, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
13
Views
480
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jan 3, 2026
Jarhead67
J
R
Flex plate and starter issues
  • RJH46
  • Jun 24, 2025
  • Other Auto Tech
Replies
19
Views
1K
Other Auto Tech Aug 19, 2025
nickyb
SN95 Desktop 363 Engine Combination - Looking for input
  • WhiteCobra95
  • Sep 8, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
11
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Oct 6, 2025
Habu135
6
Hey all,I’m putting together a 302 for my 1968 Mustang and wanted to post the combo + some questions to make sure I’m not missing crucial
  • 68_Disgustang
  • Feb 22, 2026
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
3
Views
692
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Feb 28, 2026
Noobz347
S
Requesting Guidance for 306 motor swap - Fuel? - SD? MAF?
  • So_Flo
  • Jul 26, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
32
Views
2K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jan 4, 2026
Mcmahst
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?