• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech

Do I need a SFI balancer and flexplate for the street?

  • Thread starter Thread starter jb1dsl
  • Start date Start date Feb 20, 2007

jb1dsl

Member
May 24, 2004
566
0
17
Marianna, Fl.
Feb 20, 2007
#1
  • Feb 20, 2007
  • #1
Im building a 347 for the street and was wondering do I really need a sfi balancer and flexplate? I will not be racing this car just running around town, so nothing over 6000 rpm max. Can I use a new pioneer balancer and flexplate from the local parts store since I will not be revving super high?
 
G

getusummm

Member
Dec 26, 2004
156
0
16
Feb 20, 2007
#2
  • Feb 20, 2007
  • #2
I would not recommend it. I recently went through this. My brand new pioneer balancer last all of about 1000 or less. When it broke, it took out my waterpump, fan, fan clutch, fan shroud, radiator, and a power steering hose. Mine actually broke at the crank. I went ahead and upgraded to the SFI just to prevent most costly repairs down the road. The old saying is true: Pay me now or pay me later. And usually later includes alot of interest, lol.
 

poneypower89

Now everyone in the world will know I wanna bang t
Dec 6, 2004
0
3
28
Indianapolis, Indiana
Feb 20, 2007
#3
  • Feb 20, 2007
  • #3
No reason to spend the money to build a 347 and not put the right supporting parts on it.

Either way, no matter how much someone says they arent gonna race the car... lets be real. You are spending money to BUILD A 347! Please dont sit here and say you will never take it through the rpms... you would be lying.

The balancer and flexplate are important parts of engine... don't skimp out in that area.. cool?
 
8

86bluecobra

Advanced Member
Dec 20, 2004
4,265
12
69
B.C. Canada
Feb 20, 2007
#4
  • Feb 20, 2007
  • #4
Basically if you do not buy a good SFI balancer you are cheaping out on the piece that protects your bottom end from vibration. You can get some inexpensive SFI approved balancers.
 

jb1dsl

Member
May 24, 2004
566
0
17
Marianna, Fl.
Feb 21, 2007
#5
  • Feb 21, 2007
  • #5
So this one would be fine?

http://store.summitracing.com/partd...908282+4294871848+4294864619+115&autoview=sku
 
G

getusummm

Member
Dec 26, 2004
156
0
16
Feb 21, 2007
#6
  • Feb 21, 2007
  • #6
That would be fine. I would call and make sure that you dont need a spacer though. Most aftermarket balancers are sort of universal and require spacers to get the correct pulley spacing. I got mine from professional products.
 

jb1dsl

Member
May 24, 2004
566
0
17
Marianna, Fl.
Feb 21, 2007
#7
  • Feb 21, 2007
  • #7
Do you guys know which ones are direct bolt ons?
 
T

TheUser

Active Member
Jul 25, 2003
1,859
1
36
Springfield, MO
Feb 21, 2007
#8
  • Feb 21, 2007
  • #8
An SFI balancer is one that has met certain safety requirements (I researched this quite a bit last summer and made a post about it, but I can't find it by searching). SFI approval doesn't mean the balancer is good or not, it just means it meets certain safety requirements. I think what it came down to was an SFI balancer is certified to not come off, but don't quote me on that.

I'm gonna try to dig that post up...
 
T

TheUser

Active Member
Jul 25, 2003
1,859
1
36
Springfield, MO
Feb 21, 2007
#9
  • Feb 21, 2007
  • #9
I found that post:
http://forums.stangnet.com/showthread.php?t=638413

Here is one of my quotes from that thread:
TheUser said:
From what I understand from some google searching, SFI-Approved just means they're approved by a safety group to fit properly and have 4 bolts for the pulley. One racing group says if you don't have an SFI approved balancer, you must have a shield around your balancer, I guess so if it were to come loose.
Click to expand...

BTW, don't interpret my posts as saying not to buy a high quality balancer; I'm saying I wouldn't worry about SFI-approval as much as Brand/Quality.

I ended up going w/ a Ford Racing stock replacement. Then again, I wasn't building a monster 347 like you are. Get a good balancer. For an expensive engine, I'd probably get a Romac just for peace of mind.
 

jb1dsl

Member
May 24, 2004
566
0
17
Marianna, Fl.
Feb 22, 2007
#10
  • Feb 22, 2007
  • #10
So which ones are direct bolt ons without worrying with spacers. Ill be using the timing cover and water pump off my 66 289. The pullies will be serp pullies off a 5.0 and the alt bracket will be an aftermarket one.
 

Woodrow

Founding Member
May 19, 2002
183
0
0
Atlanta/Auburn
Feb 22, 2007
#11
  • Feb 22, 2007
  • #11
I would look at an ati if it was me, but then again I have used prof. products on other peoples stuff when they were tight on cash with no problems.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Progress Thread Progress Thread- From6to8's 95 GT/Saleen Supercharged 331 install
  • from6to8
  • Mar 22, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
24
Views
937
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- May 6, 2026
from6to8
H
Forced Induction On3 Turbo Kit- Parts list NEEDED - 302 Stock Motor
  • Hirothecool1
  • Feb 27, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2
Replies
21
Views
1K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Mar 7, 2026
slow84lx
S
351w turbo build.... Turbo guys teach me things...
  • Kid wita 5oh
  • Oct 22, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
13
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Oct 23, 2025
General karthief
  • Locked
Engine Might have to get a Dart block but don't want to and if I do, then 363 instead of 331. Thoughts on what I've already bought so far.......
  • from6to8
  • Jul 8, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
2
Views
518
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Jul 8, 2025
Noobz347
J
2004 Mustang 3.8L V6 vibrations above 65 MPH and differential leaks
  • joeybuddy96
  • Mar 16, 2026
  • SN95 V6 Mustang Tech
Replies
16
Views
594
SN95 V6 Mustang Tech Jul 14, 2026
joeybuddy96
J
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?