• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech

do the March pulleys work better?

  • Thread starter Thread starter 1994Vib.RedGT
  • Start date Start date Oct 10, 2005
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last

1994Vib.RedGT

Member
Aug 19, 2004
585
0
16
Denver, CO
Oct 10, 2005
#1
  • Oct 10, 2005
  • #1
Im looking at pullies and I definetly think Im going with alum. pulleys because of the less rotating mass, but I saw an add for March pulleys claiming they add the most power, does anyone know if their pulleys are any better than some MAC/BBK or the ebay ones?
 

S/CBlack95GT

New Member
Apr 6, 2003
2,018
0
0
Tampa Palms, FL
Oct 10, 2005
#2
  • Oct 10, 2005
  • #2
March makes good pulleys. I would buy them over BBK any day.
 

5.0_GT_kid

20+ Year Stangneter
Apr 18, 2004
1,155
1
39
Largo, Florida
Oct 10, 2005
#3
  • Oct 10, 2005
  • #3
I have the BBK pulleys and like them, very good quality.

I don't see why one set of pulleys would get more HP than another.
 

95COBRA241

New Member
Sep 3, 2005
339
0
0
Delray Beach, FL
Oct 10, 2005
#4
  • Oct 10, 2005
  • #4
I believe all the pullies are basically equal, the aluminum's are light than the steel and I think the March's add a little more bling IMO. Just be careful with the alternator pulley, as some have experienced charging probs.
 

Cobra4075

Founding Member
Feb 18, 2002
286
1
17
Tinley Park, IL
Oct 10, 2005
#5
  • Oct 10, 2005
  • #5
I was told the BBK one's have the same underdrive as the march. I have BBK with no problems and still look great.
 

94-302-vert

Active Member
Aug 16, 2004
1,947
2
36
NE CT
Oct 11, 2005
#6
  • Oct 11, 2005
  • #6
I have the BBK steel ones and I like them. IMO the alum is not worth the extra $$ unless you want blingy. There is much more to be saved with a lightweight, clutch, flywheel, alum d/s, light wheels, etc...
 

Killercanary

The car that set the bar.
Founding Member
Nov 29, 1999
5,676
1
76
Altoona, PA
Oct 11, 2005
#7
  • Oct 11, 2005
  • #7
I know this argument comes up every once in a while, but I gained a SOLID 3 tenths and 3mph with my aluminum ASP pulleys, and that is a gain that I've seen few others get. Its not to say that the ASP's make more power, but I can assure you I'd never own any other set. I've had mine since at least '99 and they look as good as the day I got them. I even have the sliver anodized ones. ASP offers theirs in a few different colors as well.
 

Killercanary

The car that set the bar.
Founding Member
Nov 29, 1999
5,676
1
76
Altoona, PA
Oct 11, 2005
#8
  • Oct 11, 2005
  • #8
94-302-vert said:
I have the BBK steel ones and I like them. IMO the alum is not worth the extra $$ unless you want blingy. There is much more to be saved with a lightweight, clutch, flywheel, alum d/s, light wheels, etc...
Click to expand...


Steel will rust... aluminum does not. For that reason alone I think the aluminum ones are the clear choice, but the added loss in mass is always great, especially when its at the front of the car and its rotating mass. I firmly believe that every little bit helps and its the little things that seperate the well performing combos from the middle of the pack ones.
 

94-302-vert

Active Member
Aug 16, 2004
1,947
2
36
NE CT
Oct 11, 2005
#9
  • Oct 11, 2005
  • #9
Paul,

I agree if you are planning to go all out to buy aluminum pullies. Every little bit counts. For me it is a street car, that I will probably only have 2-3 years max.

Remember that it is not the weight of the pullies but the moment of inertia differences that make the HP difference. With a maximum RPM of a stock motor of 5500 rpm or so there will be less than 1 hp or so between the two pullies. Clean powersteering fluid can account for more than this. So for the extra $20 I chose to save the money towards better mods.
 

Zero Signal

Active Member
Feb 24, 2003
2,633
2
46
Tucson, AZ
Oct 11, 2005
#10
  • Oct 11, 2005
  • #10
I'm gonna go out on a limb and say the weight difference will net you close to zero gain. If you look at the weight of those and their rotational moment of inertia, the difference is going to be so relatively small I'd say it's negligible. The aluminum ones do look really nice though. If I were buying them I would go steel only becuase I don't care if they rust to all hell as long as they work.
 

95COBRA241

New Member
Sep 3, 2005
339
0
0
Delray Beach, FL
Oct 11, 2005
#11
  • Oct 11, 2005
  • #11
Killercanary said:
ASP offers theirs in a few different colors as well.
Click to expand...

Do you have a link. I tried www.autospecialties.com but it didn't work.
 

MysteryMachine

Active Member
Jun 21, 2003
1,835
2
39
Parkesburg, PA
Oct 11, 2005
#12
  • Oct 11, 2005
  • #12
i got the MAC steal ones cheap off ebay used. work great and i painted them to match everything else in my engine bay. I wanted blingy ones but the extra $ for the shine was't worth it for me
 
T

The NJ Exile

New Member
Jul 28, 2004
81
0
0
Northern VA, Philly & Northern NJ
Oct 11, 2005
#13
  • Oct 11, 2005
  • #13
I have the March Alum. kit ( it has a fancy alt. pulley cover). I agree with Paul. There a soild performer! I also gain .3 and 2.4 mph in my 1/4 time. I went with the Alum. because of the F'ing great winters we have here in the northeast .. Alum will not rust ( unlike the rest of my car!
 

Kevin R.

New Member
Jun 3, 2004
473
0
0
Ohio
Oct 11, 2005
#14
  • Oct 11, 2005
  • #14
I have the BBK Aluminum ones, and they added a little horsepower, not really noticable.

I do have some charging problems though. Got a new battery and although you can see the volts drop when no on the throttle, it hasn't drained it any.
 
T

The NJ Exile

New Member
Jul 28, 2004
81
0
0
Northern VA, Philly & Northern NJ
Oct 11, 2005
#15
  • Oct 11, 2005
  • #15
My light get dim, even with a new battery and alt. BUT I sit in alot of D.C. Traffic from home to Base in D.C.
 
C

cyberwolf1986

New Member
Aug 17, 2005
65
0
0
Oct 11, 2005
#16
  • Oct 11, 2005
  • #16
Where can you get a set of asp pulleys
 

droptopford 5 0

Member
Mar 31, 2005
427
0
17
Oct 11, 2005
#17
  • Oct 11, 2005
  • #17
The NJ Exile said:
I have the March Alum. kit ( it has a fancy alt. pulley cover). I agree with Paul. There a soild performer! I also gain .3 and 2.4 mph in my 1/4 time. I went with the Alum. because of the F'ing great winters we have here in the northeast .. Alum will not rust ( unlike the rest of my car!
Click to expand...
did you have any trouble bolting on your alt. pulley? i know that the march alt. pulley is a little thicker than the stockers so when i tried to thread the nut on with the split ring lock washer they gave me i can only get 1.5-2 threads on... what's the deal? (and this is the stock alt.) i chose to not use it just because i dont trust 2 threads holding my pulleys on, but it does look pretty good, it will add a little more power, and it's just a shame to not use a piece that probably cost me about 35-40 bucks alone.
 
T

The NJ Exile

New Member
Jul 28, 2004
81
0
0
Northern VA, Philly & Northern NJ
Oct 11, 2005
#18
  • Oct 11, 2005
  • #18
I had the same problem... I said F the washer and used red Locktight. That dam washer almost cost me ( I about striped the nut trying to get that dam thing on there...
droptopford 5 0 said:
did you have any trouble bolting on your alt. pulley? i know that the march alt. pulley is a little thicker than the stockers so when i tried to thread the nut on with the split ring lock washer they gave me i can only get 1.5-2 threads on... what's the deal? (and this is the stock alt.) i chose to not use it just because i dont trust 2 threads holding my pulleys on, but it does look pretty good, it will add a little more power, and it's just a shame to not use a piece that probably cost me about 35-40 bucks alone.
Click to expand...
 

94MustangGT5.0

New Member
Apr 30, 2003
288
0
0
Champaign, Illinois
Oct 11, 2005
#19
  • Oct 11, 2005
  • #19
I left the alternator pulley off, I just didn't see that it would create much performance gain and I didn't want as severe charging issues (my lights do still dim a bit at idle because the crank pulley slows down the entire serpentine belt, thus reducing alternator output.)
 

Pokageek

Active Member
Jun 10, 2005
2,767
0
46
MA, USA
Oct 11, 2005
#20
  • Oct 11, 2005
  • #20
Yep, I got that from someone here. I did not put on the matching alternator pulley b/c it is almost null gain and didn't want to be worried with charging probs.
 
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

A
Discussion on mild budget build/ top end
  • Acesario
  • Feb 21, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
20
Views
651
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Feb 23, 2026
General karthief
Question about power steering.
  • 2003 mustang gt modded
  • Oct 23, 2024
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Replies
5
Views
411
1994 - 1995 Specific Tech Nov 15, 2024
manicmechanic007
A
95 Gt intermittent backfire
  • A_A_Ron
  • May 26, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
0
Views
396
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- May 26, 2025
A_A_Ron
A
0
V6 to V8 Swap info
  • 02_2v_Curtis
  • Jan 11, 2026
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
0
Views
584
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- Jan 11, 2026
02_2v_Curtis
0
S
please help! not a typical coyote swap
  • sarver24
  • Nov 15, 2024
  • Other Auto Tech
Replies
4
Views
748
Other Auto Tech Nov 15, 2024
manicmechanic007
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?