• Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech

Does anyone make a fuel sending unit with a bigger pickup?

  • Thread starter Thread starter lauras70mach1
  • Start date Start date Oct 6, 2007
L

lauras70mach1

Member
Aug 1, 2004
202
0
17
minnesota
Oct 6, 2007
#1
  • Oct 6, 2007
  • #1
title says it all.
 
C

chromedog

New Member
Jan 13, 2006
554
0
0
worlds center for speed
Oct 6, 2007
#2
  • Oct 6, 2007
  • #2
bigger than what? most aftermarket pickups are 3/8" ...if you need bigger, youre pretty much limited to bigger tubing, and silver solder
 
B

bnickel

Founding Member
Aug 21, 2002
5,640
3
77
lubbock, texas
Oct 8, 2007
#3
  • Oct 8, 2007
  • #3
factory v8 pickups in 69 and 70 for sure were already 3/8". unless you're planning on well over 450hp that's all you'll need.
 
L

lauras70mach1

Member
Aug 1, 2004
202
0
17
minnesota
Oct 8, 2007
#4
  • Oct 8, 2007
  • #4
Mine's original and it's 5/16.
 

CraigMBA

New Member
Mar 24, 2007
783
1
0
Orange, CA
Oct 8, 2007
#5
  • Oct 8, 2007
  • #5
I have one in my hot little hands here from Oval Industrires I got from National Parts Depot. It fits a '70 and is 3/8".
 

68GT500KR_Vert

5 Year Member
Aug 21, 2006
353
60
59
Virginia Beach, VA
Oct 8, 2007
#6
  • Oct 8, 2007
  • #6
You can insert a fitting into you stock tank (any size you want) and use the current sending unit as a retutn line port.
 
B

bnickel

Founding Member
Aug 21, 2002
5,640
3
77
lubbock, texas
Oct 8, 2007
#7
  • Oct 8, 2007
  • #7
lauras70mach1 said:
Mine's original and it's 5/16.
Click to expand...


was your car originally a 6 cylinder? if not then someone has either swapped in a 6 cylinder gas tank or sending unit at one time. as i said, the original v8 units were 3/8". i guess it's possible that someone on the assembly line grabbed an incorrect tank or sending unit and installed it, though. regardless it should have originally been a 3/8 sending unit
 

rusty428cj

10 Year Member
Sep 29, 2007
943
265
104
Port Richey Fl
Oct 8, 2007
#8
  • Oct 8, 2007
  • #8
I changed mine to 1/2" by using a bulkhead fitting and AN fittings on my race car.
 
L

lauras70mach1

Member
Aug 1, 2004
202
0
17
minnesota
Oct 8, 2007
#9
  • Oct 8, 2007
  • #9
rusty428cj said:
I changed mine to 1/2" by using a bulkhead fitting and AN fittings on my race car.
Click to expand...

Got any photos?
 

CraigMBA

New Member
Mar 24, 2007
783
1
0
Orange, CA
Oct 8, 2007
#10
  • Oct 8, 2007
  • #10
68GT500KR_Vert said:
You can insert a fitting into you stock tank (any size you want) and use the current sending unit as a retutn line port.
Click to expand...

Bad idea. Your return line should always be the bigger of the two lines. That side isn't under pressure like the supply side and needs the help to evacuate.
 
B

bnickel

Founding Member
Aug 21, 2002
5,640
3
77
lubbock, texas
Oct 9, 2007
#11
  • Oct 9, 2007
  • #11
CraigMBA said:
Bad idea. Your return line should always be the bigger of the two lines. That side isn't under pressure like the supply side and needs the help to evacuate.
Click to expand...


huh? i've never seen a return line that was larger than the supply line. maybe the same size but never a larger one. the idea is that fuel will be used at a greater rate than it is sent back to the tank, generally.
 

CraigMBA

New Member
Mar 24, 2007
783
1
0
Orange, CA
Oct 12, 2007
#12
  • Oct 12, 2007
  • #12
bnickel said:
huh? i've never seen a return line that was larger than the supply line. maybe the same size but never a larger one. the idea is that fuel will be used at a greater rate than it is sent back to the tank, generally.
Click to expand...

It needs to be the same size at a minimum. But bigger is OK. Smaller isn't.

If you have a huge fuel pump to support huge horsepower, you need a huge return line. At full throttle, you use most (all?) the fuel. When you idle it has to go somewhere. Putting it into too small a return line is a problem on a street car. A straight line race car probablly doesn't care one way or another. Likewise, if you're using a stock 55 GPH deal it doesn't matter.
 

CraigMBA

New Member
Mar 24, 2007
783
1
0
Orange, CA
Oct 12, 2007
#13
  • Oct 12, 2007
  • #13
Car Craft has an article that says the exact opposite of what I wrote.

I still don't think I'm wrong, but I might be talking about EFI high pressure pumps and not low pressure high volume pumps for carburators.

Anyway, I apologize for spreading bad tech. My bad.
 
B

bnickel

Founding Member
Aug 21, 2002
5,640
3
77
lubbock, texas
Oct 13, 2007
#14
  • Oct 13, 2007
  • #14
maybe huge horsepower EFI but even stock EFI has a smaller return line, in most cases, than the supply line.
 

xoxbxfx

Founding Member
May 9, 2001
3,959
0
0
Southlake, TX
Oct 13, 2007
#15
  • Oct 13, 2007
  • #15
bnickel said:
factory v8 pickups in 69 and 70 for sure were already 3/8". unless you're planning on well over 450hp that's all you'll need.
Click to expand...

Aeromotive has carb pumps that support 700hp and has 3/8" in and outs
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

J
Winter fuel additive
  • JJHstang
  • Dec 12, 2025
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
9
Views
335
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Jan 17, 2026
GOvert
G
I
1994 Cobra - Fuel Pressure Drops Revving at Idle
  • IconicSilverGT500
  • Apr 11, 2026
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Replies
16
Views
421
1994 - 1995 Specific Tech Apr 24, 2026
Mcmahst
Fox Xtremely high fuel consumption
  • PonyGTrider
  • Apr 11, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 9 10 11
Replies
213
Views
4K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- May 9, 2026
PonyGTrider
Does anyone know where to buy this
  • PvolkStang
  • Jul 19, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
4
Views
285
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jul 20, 2025
manicmechanic007
No power to the fuel pump
  • SNOTTY 5.0
  • Jun 1, 2025
  • 2005 - 2014 S-197 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
1
Views
284
2005 - 2014 S-197 Mustang -General/Talk- Oct 2, 2025
zurliene10
Z
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?