DOES MAC AND BBK GET ALONG WITH EACH OTHER?

CobraSVT95

New Member
Jun 18, 2004
57
0
0
My current exhaust setup consists of...
BBK shorties
BBK o/r h-pipe
2 chamber flows

i like the sound don't get me wrong but the deal is i am looking for a different note and i have heard nothing but good things about the prochamber from mac. but i wanted to know if u guys would recommend that i change the headers too.. to mac

thanks!
 
ok, but will mixing the two brands make it sound weird, will the two (prochamber, bbk shorties) fit together all right, and how is the loudness of the prochamber compare to the bbk o/r
 
I'm pretty sure they are bitter rivals and refuse to work together. I had to pay off my lt's and H to accept air used by a "dirty" bbk throttle body. I still don't think they have found out about the bbk fuel pressure regulator and pump. So be careful.
 
They should fit right up, my bbk shorties fit perfect with my mac o/r h pipe. As far as loudness goes(this is from what I have read) some say they are quiter :shrug: . When it comes to exhaust it's some what hit or miss they are either going to bolt right up or you will want to sell it to the first person that will offer you $10 for it.
 
wytstang said:
They should fit right up, my bbk shorties fit perfect with my mac o/r h pipe. As far as loudness goes(this is from what I have read) some say they are quiter :shrug: . When it comes to exhaust it's some what hit or miss they are either going to bolt right up or you will want to sell it to the first person that will offer you $10 for it.

My MAC headers weren't that hard to install, at least, no more of PITA then any exhaust work is on a 9 year old car! :shrug: When I did mine I put a used BBK high flow cat H-pipe on there at the same time and it went together like butta. Recently I replaced the BBK H with a BBK o/r X and they mated together fine as well, with the exception of me snapping a header collector bolt cause I'm an idiot. So in my experience, MAC and BBK parts are interchangeable.

As far as changing it up, I don't think different shorties are gonna affect the tone or HP gain. To be honest, I wish I had stayed with the stock headers and spent the 400 dollars on something else... like NOS. My motor doesn't inhale enough to take advantage of all that exhaust work.

The biggest change in tone is gonna be at the muffler.

Sleepy McNastee said:
I'm pretty sure they are bitter rivals and refuse to work together. I had to pay off my lt's and H to accept air used by a "dirty" bbk throttle body. I still don't think they have found out about the bbk fuel pressure regulator and pump. So be careful.
Today 01:22 AM

:rlaugh:
 
Black95GTS said:
My MAC headers weren't that hard to install, at least, no more of PITA then any exhaust work is on a 9 year old car! :shrug:
When I was shopping for headers I read through the old review section here on stangnet and their was a lot of complaints about the flanges not lining up to the heads :shrug: and the only complaints about the bbk where the welds being crappy. If it wasen't for those complaint I would have gladly went with the macs and paid less.
 
The prochamber is supposed to be more of a mix between the x and h pipes. Im sure u have gone to mustangexhaust.com and listened to a couple. Thats what im gonna put on the end of my bbk long tubes for my 351 and some 40 series.

Oh yea, prochambers are supposed to make the most power also...always a PLUS.