• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech

DOES MAC AND BBK GET ALONG WITH EACH OTHER?

  • Thread starter Thread starter CobraSVT95
  • Start date Start date Jul 23, 2004
C

CobraSVT95

New Member
Jun 18, 2004
57
0
0
Jul 23, 2004
#1
  • Jul 23, 2004
  • #1
My current exhaust setup consists of...
BBK shorties
BBK o/r h-pipe
2 chamber flows

i like the sound don't get me wrong but the deal is i am looking for a different note and i have heard nothing but good things about the prochamber from mac. but i wanted to know if u guys would recommend that i change the headers too.. to mac

thanks!
 
W

wytstang

Mustang Master
Mar 14, 2004
4,988
4
78
Summerville,SC missing South Fl. weather :(
Jul 23, 2004
#2
  • Jul 23, 2004
  • #2
I wouldn't change the headers. If you do go to long tubes, I have read that the mac shorties are a pain to install(when I researched for headers) thats why I went with the bbk shorties. They said that the flanges on the mac didn't line up very well at all with the heads(any set of heads).
 
C

CobraSVT95

New Member
Jun 18, 2004
57
0
0
Jul 23, 2004
#3
  • Jul 23, 2004
  • #3
ok, but will mixing the two brands make it sound weird, will the two (prochamber, bbk shorties) fit together all right, and how is the loudness of the prochamber compare to the bbk o/r
 

Sleepy McNastee

New Member
Feb 5, 2004
491
0
0
Lawrence, KS
Jul 23, 2004
#4
  • Jul 23, 2004
  • #4
I'm pretty sure they are bitter rivals and refuse to work together. I had to pay off my lt's and H to accept air used by a "dirty" bbk throttle body. I still don't think they have found out about the bbk fuel pressure regulator and pump. So be careful.
 
W

wytstang

Mustang Master
Mar 14, 2004
4,988
4
78
Summerville,SC missing South Fl. weather :(
Jul 23, 2004
#5
  • Jul 23, 2004
  • #5
They should fit right up, my bbk shorties fit perfect with my mac o/r h pipe. As far as loudness goes(this is from what I have read) some say they are quiter . When it comes to exhaust it's some what hit or miss they are either going to bolt right up or you will want to sell it to the first person that will offer you $10 for it.
 
C

CobraSVT95

New Member
Jun 18, 2004
57
0
0
Jul 23, 2004
#6
  • Jul 23, 2004
  • #6
well hey "wytstang" is your mid-pipe a prochamber and how do you like the sound of your setup. and do you have a cat back
 
W

wytstang

Mustang Master
Mar 14, 2004
4,988
4
78
Summerville,SC missing South Fl. weather :(
Jul 23, 2004
#7
  • Jul 23, 2004
  • #7
CobraSVT95 said:
well hey "wytstang" is your mid-pipe a prochamber and how do you like the sound of your setup. and do you have a cat back
Click to expand...
No it's just the o/r h pipe. And yes I love the way the car sounds. And no I just have welded in flow masters, I really don't think I would notice any hp gain from a cat-back until my motor grows up some more .
 

Black95GTS

Active Member
Jan 8, 2004
1,644
3
38
Marlborough, MA
Jul 23, 2004
#8
  • Jul 23, 2004
  • #8
wytstang said:
They should fit right up, my bbk shorties fit perfect with my mac o/r h pipe. As far as loudness goes(this is from what I have read) some say they are quiter . When it comes to exhaust it's some what hit or miss they are either going to bolt right up or you will want to sell it to the first person that will offer you $10 for it.
Click to expand...

My MAC headers weren't that hard to install, at least, no more of PITA then any exhaust work is on a 9 year old car! When I did mine I put a used BBK high flow cat H-pipe on there at the same time and it went together like butta. Recently I replaced the BBK H with a BBK o/r X and they mated together fine as well, with the exception of me snapping a header collector bolt cause I'm an idiot. So in my experience, MAC and BBK parts are interchangeable.

As far as changing it up, I don't think different shorties are gonna affect the tone or HP gain. To be honest, I wish I had stayed with the stock headers and spent the 400 dollars on something else... like NOS. My motor doesn't inhale enough to take advantage of all that exhaust work.

The biggest change in tone is gonna be at the muffler.

Sleepy McNastee said:
I'm pretty sure they are bitter rivals and refuse to work together. I had to pay off my lt's and H to accept air used by a "dirty" bbk throttle body. I still don't think they have found out about the bbk fuel pressure regulator and pump. So be careful.
Today 01:22 AM
Click to expand...

 
W

wytstang

Mustang Master
Mar 14, 2004
4,988
4
78
Summerville,SC missing South Fl. weather :(
Jul 23, 2004
#9
  • Jul 23, 2004
  • #9
Black95GTS said:
My MAC headers weren't that hard to install, at least, no more of PITA then any exhaust work is on a 9 year old car!
Click to expand...
When I was shopping for headers I read through the old review section here on stangnet and their was a lot of complaints about the flanges not lining up to the heads and the only complaints about the bbk where the welds being crappy. If it wasen't for those complaint I would have gladly went with the macs and paid less.
 

nmcgrawj

Advanced Member
Sep 28, 2003
3,651
4
68
Indianapolis, IN
Jul 23, 2004
#10
  • Jul 23, 2004
  • #10
The prochamber is supposed to be more of a mix between the x and h pipes. Im sure u have gone to mustangexhaust.com and listened to a couple. Thats what im gonna put on the end of my bbk long tubes for my 351 and some 40 series.

Oh yea, prochambers are supposed to make the most power also...always a PLUS.
 

jwalker

Founding Member
Aug 4, 2002
405
0
0
millersville,pa
Jul 23, 2004
#11
  • Jul 23, 2004
  • #11
My MAC shorties went on with no problems at all?
 
C

CobraSVT95

New Member
Jun 18, 2004
57
0
0
Jul 25, 2004
#12
  • Jul 25, 2004
  • #12
thanks for all the replies guys
 

WhiteDevil

New Member
Feb 4, 2003
2,717
0
0
San Diego
Jul 25, 2004
#13
  • Jul 25, 2004
  • #13
My BBK O/R X pipe fits up nicely to my MAC catback, so i guess they can be friends sometimes.
 
C

CobraSVT95

New Member
Jun 18, 2004
57
0
0
Jul 25, 2004
#14
  • Jul 25, 2004
  • #14
well i am not worried about the mid pipe fitting the cat back its the mac mid pipe fitting the bbk headers.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

C
Need MIL Eliminators?
  • crazyone64
  • May 18, 2026
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Replies
3
Views
131
SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech May 21, 2026
GOvert
G
E
1986 Convertable 5.0 GT
  • eneerg
  • Sep 24, 2025
  • The Welcome Wagon
Replies
4
Views
232
The Welcome Wagon Sep 24, 2025
Noobz347
T
First Car, what should I do for power??
  • tunedV6
  • Apr 13, 2026
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
7
Views
226
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- May 4, 2026
580HP*428Cj
5
9
Forced Induction Prepping for supercharger on non-stock build
  • 91fox427
  • Nov 25, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
7
Views
392
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Jan 5, 2026
Qtrhrse23
Q
R
Progress Thread Heads/cam decision
  • RileyDymond
  • Oct 26, 2024
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
4
Views
287
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Oct 27, 2024
rednotch
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?