• Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech

Double Check My Procedure Here..

  • Thread starter Thread starter woodsnake
  • Start date Start date Aug 23, 2013

woodsnake

15 Year Member
Jan 16, 2007
1,352
15
69
Hicksville, NY
Aug 23, 2013
#1
  • Aug 23, 2013
  • #1
I am working on my 69 Cougar, with a 361W. I got started on it last October/November, before I moved everything to Colorado. The basic build is a .030 over, .010 over under with a retrofitted roller cam. Trick Flow 170 heads, (I know now, not big enough) and a 670 Holley street avenger. The rear gears are a 3.89 behind a T5. The cam specs out at .513/.513.
http://www.compcams.com/Company/CC/cam-specs/Details.aspx?csid=894&sb=2

The last thing I need for my engine internally, is a set of push rods. I measured today.... 8.137 inch length. Seems like a lot to me, but Trick Flow said in their instructions that came with my heads that longer than stock PR's are required.
I guess my question is, does it matter where in the firing order you start with the measuring process? I installed the light weight springs, and made a few rotations. Came back to it and did it again today, with a solid converted roller lifter. PERFECT center of the valve stem, narrow sweep.
I have three extra sets of push rods around, I had hoped that one of them would be long enough, but nope! I see that I can get these:
http://www.summitracing.com/parts/man-25811-8/overview/

For under a hundred, and then plus shipping.
Do you see anything here that I may have done procedurally that is flawed? After my last go round with PR measurements, I just want to double check my method here.
 

rbohm

Founding Member
Apr 12, 2002
6,698
550
204
tucson,az
Aug 23, 2013
#2
  • Aug 23, 2013
  • #2
no it doesnt matter where you check the pushrod length. whether you check it on number one, or number seven doesnt make a difference as all you want is proper rocker arm geometry. and if your geometry is largely different cylinder to cylinder, you have other serious issues to deal with.
 

woodsnake

15 Year Member
Jan 16, 2007
1,352
15
69
Hicksville, NY
Aug 23, 2013
#3
  • Aug 23, 2013
  • #3
I have a real good, narrow pattern, hopefully you can see it in the picture.
 

rbohm

Founding Member
Apr 12, 2002
6,698
550
204
tucson,az
Aug 24, 2013
#4
  • Aug 24, 2013
  • #4
then order the length rods you need.
 

Rusty67

20+ Year Stangneter
Dec 3, 2002
3,749
37
109
LA, CA
Aug 27, 2013
#5
  • Aug 27, 2013
  • #5
What is the ratio on your rocker arms ? 1.6 or 1.7 ? Maybe that would account for the extra length needed ?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

6
Hey all,I’m putting together a 302 for my 1968 Mustang and wanted to post the combo + some questions to make sure I’m not missing crucial
  • 68_Disgustang
  • Feb 22, 2026
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
4
Views
718
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Jun 20, 2026
gray owl
G
3
Eight inches is enough for me...
  • 351MooseStang
  • Nov 27, 2025
  • 1974 - 1978 Mustang II Talk & Tech
Replies
5
Views
525
1974 - 1978 Mustang II Talk & Tech Mar 2, 2026
Bullitt347
Engine Valve and or rocker noise .....new to this but dont mind getting my hands dirty.
  • mustang matt 1993
  • Jun 29, 2024
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
16
Views
2K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Jul 1, 2024
rednotch
S
Requesting Guidance for 306 motor swap - Fuel? - SD? MAF?
  • So_Flo
  • Jul 26, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
32
Views
2K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jan 4, 2026
Mcmahst
help me understand calibrated maf sensors and injectors
  • stackz
  • Sep 21, 2024
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
21
Views
2K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Feb 7, 2026
AeroCoupe
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?