• Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech

Drawbacks to rough idle?

  • Thread starter Thread starter streetstang67
  • Start date Start date Feb 5, 2004
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
First Prev 2 of 2

ratio411

Founding Member
Apr 21, 2002
3,870
73
109
Pensacola FL
Feb 7, 2004
#21
  • Feb 7, 2004
  • #21
A tighter LSA on a 260 cam will not even be noticable.
I had a 260 Comp in a 302, 110 LSA... You couldn't even hear it. Sounded stock. Moving the LSA down to 106 or 8 would not be an issue at all.
The LSA does affect idle, but not nearly as much as duration. I am surprised a cam rep even made that remark while discussing a 260 cam.
Another thing to note:
LSA & duration affect idle, but also the choice of single or dual pattern cam affects the idle.
A single pattern cam has a very rythmic lope, assuming enough duration to lope.
A dual pattern cam has a very rough, chaotic lope.
Personally, I would not use a Comp 260 ever again... At least not the 'off the shelf' version. A tighter LSA version might be better, but only in a very mild, daily driver, little to no mod type of car.
It would be great in a truck though.
My .02
Dave
 

zookeeper

Founding Member
Aug 25, 2001
3,415
63
109
Rogue River, Oregon
Feb 7, 2004
#22
  • Feb 7, 2004
  • #22
I agree, the cam works very well for what it's intended for, which is low end torque, but for all-around performance, Comp makes better cams. I'd try at least a 268H which is a very, very good street grind, has a nice lopey idle, and will produce more power and increase mileage. Now what more could you ask?
 

HistoricMustang

Active Member
Apr 11, 2003
2,359
0
46
Confederate States of America
Feb 7, 2004
#23
  • Feb 7, 2004
  • #23
A park plug or two will need to be changed a little sooner, but it is worth it!

HistoricMustang
www.historicmustang.com
 

brianj5600

Active Member
Sep 19, 2003
1,964
2
39
Middle TN
Feb 7, 2004
#24
  • Feb 7, 2004
  • #24
This is the cam in question.

I would run this part #31-412-4, this is one of my specialty cams. It
is kind of a small cam with a tight seperation, which will provide torque and
the sound you are looking for. Here is the spec card for that cam.
Cam Spec Card Inquiry
PART NO. 31-412-4
01 INTAKE MASTER 260H-9
02 EXHAUST MASTER 268H-9
03 ENGINE FS 260AH-8
04 GRIND NUMBER FS 260AH-8
INT EXH
05 HYDRAULIC Y/N YES 14 DUR @.050 212 218
INTAKE EXHAUST 15 LOBE LIFT .2960 .2960
06 VALVE ADJUSTMENT HYD HYD 16 ROCKER RATIO .00 .00
07 MAX GROSS VALVE LIFT .474 .474
08 DUR @ .006 TAPPET LIFT 260 268 17 LOBE SEPARATI 108.0
18 ADVANCE 0
09 VALVE TIMING OPEN CLOSE 19 VALVE SPRINGS
@ .006 10 INT 22 58
11 EXH 62 26 DATE SETUP / /
12 THESE SPECS ARE FOR CAM(S) INSTALLED
@ 108.0 INTAKE CENTERLINE

If it is not stupid expensive, I'd say go for it! It has more lift than the usual 260h or 268h. If you plan on changing your intake you will need a bigger cam, but for what you have now listen to the comp tech person.
 
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
First Prev 2 of 2
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

K
Resolved Need some assistance. Holley Terminator X alongside H/C/I. Very rough/inconsistent idle
  • karhoot
  • Jun 6, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
0
Views
75
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Jun 6, 2026
karhoot
K
A
Rough idle - cylinder 1 and 6 misfire HELP
  • austindavies935
  • Jul 24, 2025
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Replies
12
Views
650
SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech Jul 24, 2025
gkomo
I
Engine Insane fuel trims +25% LTFT Bank 1, -16% LTFT Bank 2
  • imw_stl
  • Aug 31, 2025
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Replies
2
Views
273
SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech Sep 19, 2025
Mustang5L5
8
Engine Rough idle and aggressive sputtering when accelerating
  • 88vertible
  • Aug 13, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
4
Views
1K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Dec 13, 2025
Jarhead67
J
SURGING IDLE / NO IDLE CHECKLIST FOR 1996–1998 MUSTANG GT (4.6L 2V) - Work In Progress
  • Noobz347
  • Aug 30, 2025
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
0
Views
686
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- Aug 30, 2025
Noobz347
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?