• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech

Engine Dss 347 Crank Failure... Possible Causes?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Cobra4B
  • Start date Start date Aug 9, 2012

Cobra4B

Founding Member
Oct 11, 2000
156
0
16
Virginia Beach, VA
Aug 9, 2012
#1
  • Aug 9, 2012
  • #1
This was in my father's road race Panoz with a DSS 347 with a stud girdle, road race build, AFR 165s, custom cam, Edelbrock Performer RPM Air gap, Pro-Systems carb etc. Made 370+ rwhp. Never ran right all last year; never made it through a full track weekend without some sort of problem. Finally the bed this February at VIR on the back straight at the top of 4th. No warning, no issues with oil pressure. Started ticking last fall, but the shop who built the motor swore it was a lazy lifter. I felt it was rod knock. Upon tear down all the lifters looked fine, but the rest sure didn't...

Supposed lazy lifter...

Before...



After... Snap goes the crankshaft. The mains are all intact, rods banged up but all intact as well.





I'm currently earing the car down to the bare chassis and fully rebuilding it with a new LS1 crate motor and TKO600. Tired of blowing up Fords (this is the 2nd one to snap the crank). My 2001 Z06 race car has 123,xxx miles on the longblock and the last 3k have been all track/race use... done playing with Fords.

LS1 currently being prepped...


Build thread - http://ls1tech.com/forums/conversions-hybrids/1559870-rebuilding-dads-panoz-ls1-swap.html
 

2000xp8

SN Certified Technician
Aug 8, 2003
8,016
1,613
194
NJ
Aug 10, 2012
#2
  • Aug 10, 2012
  • #2
What kind of rpm were you running?

That a stock 302 block or race block?

The stock 302 block doesn't put up with any type of sustained rpm for too long.

Not going to try and talk you out of the LS engine, because for your uses, it's probably better than a pushrod 302.
But it wouldn't hurt to consider a 2012 boss 302 crate engine.

BTW, that pic says it all on why girldles are worthless.
 

Noobz347

Stangnet Facilities Maint Tech... Er... Janitor
Admin Dude
Jan 4, 1985
42,956
21,130
234
Box behind Walmart
Aug 10, 2012
#3
  • Aug 10, 2012
  • #3
That's some of the best carnage that I've seen on a DSS yet.
 
Reactions: 2000xp8

7991LXnSHO

wanna catch the space herp
10 Year Member
Sep 1, 2010
7,387
2,745
194
Kearney, NE
Aug 10, 2012
#4
  • Aug 10, 2012
  • #4
Possible lessons - Trust your ears and get a mechanic's stethoscope to pinpoint the noise? Skip the stud girdle and go for an aftermarket block?



If you find out what happened to cause the disaster, I'd like to know.

AWESOME carnage. Did you have a vinyl seat cover and extra undies when it happened? I bet most of us would have needed them.
 
Reactions: 95Vert383AOD

Noobz347

Stangnet Facilities Maint Tech... Er... Janitor
Admin Dude
Jan 4, 1985
42,956
21,130
234
Box behind Walmart
Aug 10, 2012
#5
  • Aug 10, 2012
  • #5
7991LXnSHO said:
Possible lessons - Trust your ears and get a mechanic's stethoscope to pinpoint the noise?
Click to expand...

A little late for that.
 

Cobra4B

Founding Member
Oct 11, 2000
156
0
16
Virginia Beach, VA
Aug 10, 2012
#6
  • Aug 10, 2012
  • #6
2000xp8 said:
What kind of rpm were you running?

That a stock 302 block or race block?

The stock 302 block doesn't put up with any type of sustained rpm for too long.

Not going to try and talk you out of the LS engine, because for your uses, it's probably better than a pushrod 302.
But it wouldn't hurt to consider a 2012 boss 302 crate engine.

BTW, that pic says it all on why girldles are worthless.
Click to expand...
Stock 302 block. But it should have been plenty of this power application and 6000 rpm rev range. To my eye it appears the bottom end didn't fail first, the crank did.

LS1 crate engine = $2900 (all aluminum, 6-bolt mains, 430 rwhp with a cam swap, stock bottom end can handle 555+ rwhp)
FRPP Boss 302 crate engine = $7400 (iron, 4-bolt mains)

IMO the LS platform was a no-brainer once I figured I could just get a quicktime bellhousing and run the same style transmission etc. etc.

Are these DSS setups known for failing? The shop he used recommended the setup for a reliable 350-370 rwhp 6000 rpm trackday/road race motor.
 

rd

Founding Member
Jan 12, 2000
3,316
63
109
Ocean Springs MS
Aug 10, 2012
#7
  • Aug 10, 2012
  • #7
Is that a cast or forged crank? What was it balanced to 28-50 or neutral?
 

RangerJoe

I leave the horn on while driving
15 Year Member
Apr 26, 2010
2,560
1,146
184
Georgia
Aug 10, 2012
#8
  • Aug 10, 2012
  • #8
There was a discussion on here a year or so back regarding aftermarket blocks with cast cranks versus stock blocks with forged cranks. Many claimed that a factory block will flex so much on the bottom end, that the crank is allowed to roll and flex, causing failure. This same group making this argument claimed that this is why it is worth it to put a 800HP capable forged crank in a 500HP capable stock block. The same group claimed that you can get away with using a cast crank in an aftermarket block because the mains and block are so solid that the crank will not flex like a stock block.

About the same time this discussion was going, one of the populare Mustang mags built up two seperate engines in the same issue. One was a stock block with all forged internals, the other was a Dart based block (built by Dart if I remember correctly) and it used a cast crank. So maybe a little truth to the claim.

My point in all this is to say, the stock block is thin and will give under high stress. IMO, 6000RPM blast down the 1/4 are fine on a stocker, but sustained RPMs is a lot for one to handle. The bottome end probably flexed and let the crank flex as well. Just a thought.

Joe
 

Cobra4B

Founding Member
Oct 11, 2000
156
0
16
Virginia Beach, VA
Aug 11, 2012
#9
  • Aug 11, 2012
  • #9
FWIW the crank was a Scat forged 4340 crank.
 

RangerJoe

I leave the horn on while driving
15 Year Member
Apr 26, 2010
2,560
1,146
184
Georgia
Aug 11, 2012
#10
  • Aug 11, 2012
  • #10
Cobra4B said:
FWIW the crank was a Scat forged 4340 crank.
Click to expand...

Scat makes good stuff. Not saying their stuff doesn't have flaws, but that would make me lean towards the block weakness. Ford made alot of block improvements in the mid to late 90's, Unfortunately for us fox guys, it was done in the form of the mod motor. The LS block are definetly tough.

Joe
 

MFE92

10 Year Member
Aug 25, 2010
1,094
372
124
Phoenix
Aug 11, 2012
#11
  • Aug 11, 2012
  • #11
Tell us if you see cracks between the main bores and the cam bores, and possibly all the way down the center of the intake valley. That's how the stock blocks fail, and when they do, they open up bearing clearances and things get ugly. IMHO, that crank didn't start the problem, the block did. FWIW, I split a stock 302 block in the typical fashion, but with only 260-ish RWHP, and I did it chasing down a Lotus Elise at Mid America Motorplex. All I initially noticed was a drop in oil pressure, but the other odd thing was the oil pressure gauge acted like a vacuum gauge. When I applied load, the pressure went down.

I drove it home 2.5 hours and even ran it for a few more days before figuring it was time for a rebuild. When I tore it down, the cam bearings were walking out of their bores (and getting banged up by the cam lobes), and I discovered the cracks in the block. The vaccum-gauge action of the oil pressure was because when I applied load to the block, it flexed and opened the clearances, lowering the pressure. 6000 RPM sustained is just too much for a stock block IMHO. I'm still running a stock block though, because I can rebuild it twice more for just the cost of a Dart block, and I just keep the revs under 5800.
 

Cobra4B

Founding Member
Oct 11, 2000
156
0
16
Virginia Beach, VA
Aug 11, 2012
#12
  • Aug 11, 2012
  • #12
Funny.... I can't get the cam out because one of the bearings came loose and tries to come out with the cam. I don't see any cracks from the top in the valley area, but the main webbing is completely split from the block. Is that the area you're describing between the mains and the cam bearings?

 

MFE92

10 Year Member
Aug 25, 2010
1,094
372
124
Phoenix
Aug 11, 2012
#13
  • Aug 11, 2012
  • #13
Here's how it starts:


lots of good tech in this thread http://forums.corral.net/forums/5-0...r-one-reason-stock-302-b-breaks-pics.html

Here's how it ends, in this case another DSS 347 from this thread: http://www.460ford.com/forum/showthread.php?t=103161

 

2000xp8

SN Certified Technician
Aug 8, 2003
8,016
1,613
194
NJ
Aug 11, 2012
#14
  • Aug 11, 2012
  • #14
Cobra4B said:
Stock 302 block. But it should have been plenty of this power application and 6000 rpm rev range. To my eye it appears the bottom end didn't fail first, the crank did.

LS1 crate engine = $2900 (all aluminum, 6-bolt mains, 430 rwhp with a cam swap, stock bottom end can handle 555+ rwhp)
FRPP Boss 302 crate engine = $7400 (iron, 4-bolt mains)

IMO the LS platform was a no-brainer once I figured I could just get a quicktime bellhousing and run the same style transmission etc. etc.

Are these DSS setups known for failing? The shop he used recommended the setup for a reliable 350-370 rwhp 6000 rpm trackday/road race motor.
Click to expand...

I think we are talking about 2 different boss crate engines, i speak of the 2012-13 engine, which i think is like 12 grand, lol.

Where do you get an ls1 crate engine for $2900?
 

Cobra4B

Founding Member
Oct 11, 2000
156
0
16
Virginia Beach, VA
Aug 13, 2012
#15
  • Aug 13, 2012
  • #15
Crate Engine Depot . com
 

elarm1

10 Year Member
Dec 17, 2010
1,428
652
154
N.Va
Aug 13, 2012
#16
  • Aug 13, 2012
  • #16
Yup I did the same thing with my 306 last year. Super spinning that stock block is not good!
 

2000xp8

SN Certified Technician
Aug 8, 2003
8,016
1,613
194
NJ
Aug 13, 2012
#17
  • Aug 13, 2012
  • #17
Cobra4B said:
Crate Engine Depot . com
Click to expand...

For curiosity's sake, i went to that website to see about the engine you speak of. Cheapest LS 430hp crate engine i could find was $6200, that's no accessories, no computer and no carb setup (i'm assume you need one or the other since you currently run a ford engine).

I like LS engines, but unless i'm missing something, it's not happening for anywhere near $2900.
 

95Vert383AOD

15 Year Member
Jun 10, 2008
1,133
34
69
New Bedford, MA
Aug 13, 2012
#18
  • Aug 13, 2012
  • #18
I beat the piss out of my 351 based stroker. Its def. seen 7000RPM spinning tires around corners and keeping the pedal to the floor as i straighten her out tires still spinning.
 

Mishimoto

Member
Jun 28, 2010
60
5
19
Aug 14, 2012
#19
  • Aug 14, 2012
  • #19
We need to see pictures of the car this engine came out of, please.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

8
Engine 302 rebuild Piston Ring gap
  • 88foxy
  • Apr 7, 2021
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
1
Views
2K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Apr 13, 2021
HemiRick
Progress Thread 91 GT - 5 lug swap, suspension upgrade, restoration...
  • Andrews24
  • Mar 31, 2021
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
13
Views
2K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Apr 10, 2021
Andrews24
E
For Sale 1989 LX Notch 410ci 85mm turbo 8 pt cage 9" rear end
  • EightyNineFive
  • Aug 22, 2021
  • Fox Body Mustangs For Sale (1979-93)
Replies
1
Views
4K
Fox Body Mustangs For Sale (1979-93) Jun 18, 2022
Freakinstang
F
M
408 Stroker build (what heads)
  • Mach1969
  • Feb 9, 2020
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
5
Views
13K
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Feb 13, 2020
08GT500
New to this forum be a veteran on others
  • JmP6889928
  • May 19, 2019
  • The Welcome Wagon
Replies
5
Views
1K
The Welcome Wagon May 20, 2019
JmP6889928
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?