• Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech

Dual Exhaust 3" Tail Pipes?

  • Thread starter Thread starter shotsy
  • Start date Start date Jul 11, 2005
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
First Prev 2 of 2
J

jbuening

Member
Apr 28, 2005
399
0
17
Jul 13, 2005
#21
  • Jul 13, 2005
  • #21
Well i am not running 3" pipes but you will have problems on the drivers side near the gas tank. The tank is shifted to the left and reduces the clearance between the tank and the framerail. You could run them but you won't be able to tuck them out of the way. Are you running the dual tips like the Mach? I'd suggest dumps either before or after the axle. Drive to a muffler shop and have them take a peak. They'll tell you if they can perform magic

Run as large of pipes as you want as long as it isn't a 4 or 6 cylinder
 

mdjay

Premium Sponsor
Dec 9, 2003
896
0
16
Las Vegas, NV
Jul 13, 2005
#22
  • Jul 13, 2005
  • #22
jasonn said:
Wrong. When I unbolt it, I just turn the pipe out of the way and put one bolt back in the header to hold it up out of the way. I do not remove the exhaust system. Hueypilot, I was thinking the same thing. My 2.5 is tight also.
Click to expand...

Just a logical assumption! However you would gain more if you did...
 
6

67FBSCODE

New Member
Sep 12, 2004
60
0
0
Jul 13, 2005
#23
  • Jul 13, 2005
  • #23
I think Pipes is making some
 

thehueypilot

Active Member
Feb 25, 2004
1,084
0
37
Medina,Tennessee
Jul 14, 2005
#24
  • Jul 14, 2005
  • #24
6Stang7 said:
local muffler shop should have them.
Click to expand...


The problem with local muffler shops is they have to crimp/clamp the pipe to bend it. Most can't handle 3" or bigger pipes. When I replaced my 2.5" tail pipes that a local muffler shop had custom installed, some of the bends looked like 1.5" diameter after they had crimped it to fit. So if you are looking to gain CFM's only a CNC bent tube will do.
 

zookeeper

Founding Member
Aug 25, 2001
3,415
63
109
Rogue River, Oregon
Jul 14, 2005
#25
  • Jul 14, 2005
  • #25
I don't want to get into an exhaust theory war, but a local shop built a '68 fastback with a 347 last year for a customer, and it had 3" exhaust and the sound alone was enough to make me envious! It sounded waaaaay cool! But then again, I know nobody here ever put something on their car just because the liked it, did you? I say go for it, screw the "experts"...
 

shotsy

New Member
Apr 8, 2005
233
0
0
Oklahoma City
Jul 14, 2005
#26
  • Jul 14, 2005
  • #26
The sound is what I'm after, dumping befor the rear axle is giving me to much vibration inside the car.
 
M

mustangman70

Founding Member
Dec 30, 2001
1,235
1
0
St pete, Florida
Jul 14, 2005
#27
  • Jul 14, 2005
  • #27
I love my dumps and the vibration that comes with them....but then again im easy to please and its a gosh darn MUSCLE car for gods sake LOL
 

zookeeper

Founding Member
Aug 25, 2001
3,415
63
109
Rogue River, Oregon
Jul 14, 2005
#28
  • Jul 14, 2005
  • #28
LOL!! Now that's what I'm talking about! Seriously, at some point we as a group got brainwashed into thinking our Mustangs needed to run as smoothly as a Rolls Royce, be as fuel-efficient as a Toyota and above all else be practical and hopefully not offend anyone. What happened to having a rowdy hot rod? Maybe that's not the best thing if it's your only mode of transportation, but if it's a second car or a weekend warrior, why not? Leave the pleasant, noise-free rides with the top down and the radio playing Barry Manilow's Greatest Hits to the restorers. It's OK to have a car that barely idles, with exhaust so loud that a stereo is a waste of money and a wickedly low, race car stance. I mean jeez, isn't this America, land of independant thinkers that set stupid rules aside? I know this may sound like I'm over-reacting, but this has been a personal issue with me for months now. A freind recently loaned me an original Shelby two-fours intake manifold for my clone project. He didn't want to sell it, but said I could keep it as long as I kept the car, he didn't need it and wanted to see it on something like my car, being used rather than collecting dust. The thing has been in his possession since about '69 and is in mint condition, and I was thrilled to get it. I devised a plan to run it, using 390cfm Holley carbs I think it'll work fine. You ought to see and hear the reaction I get from some of my car buddies! You'd think I was going to run my car on nitromethane! All I hear is, " it'll never work" and " I wouldn't do that with the price of gas these days", blah, blah blah. What about building something that gives you chills just to hear it run? Don't get me wrong, I'm building my car to drive, and I personally have a strong dislike for trailer queens, but I think that lumpy cams and nasty exhaust are what makes a hot rod a hot rod and can be used on a street car. It's just my opinion, I could be wrong...
 

jasonn

Founding Member
Sep 26, 2002
316
0
16
By Rochester MN
Jul 14, 2005
#29
  • Jul 14, 2005
  • #29
AAAAAAAAAAAAAMEN!!!!!!!!!!
 
M

mustangman70

Founding Member
Dec 30, 2001
1,235
1
0
St pete, Florida
Jul 14, 2005
#30
  • Jul 14, 2005
  • #30
well said zookeeper

If you want your car to run and drive like a benz, then go buy a benz....dont get me wrong, i LOVE what evrey one is doing in here, with FI swaps and R&P, ride handling and sound controll and upgraded brakes......but damn....I have a huge tire in the back and a little skinny tire up front, with 4 wheel drum brakes a peppy 302 motor with a loud ass exhaust and love it....some people say its too "old school".....but im 19 and i frickin LOVE it lol
 
F

firepig

New Member
May 8, 2003
32
0
0
Phoenix AZ area
Jul 14, 2005
#31
  • Jul 14, 2005
  • #31
Amen!

zookeeper said:
I don't want to get into an exhaust theory war, but a local shop built a '68 fastback with a 347 last year for a customer, and it had 3" exhaust and the sound alone was enough to make me envious! It sounded waaaaay cool! But then again, I know nobody here ever put something on their car just because the liked it, did you? I say go for it, screw the "experts"...
Click to expand...

Amen brotha. Geeez!! The poor guy just asked where he could get 3" pipes! There's a guy in our club with 3" on his 65 and they sound great.
 
D

D.Hearne

New Member
Sep 29, 2000
11,730
6
0
south louisiana
Jul 14, 2005
#32
  • Jul 14, 2005
  • #32
Fire breathing, loud as **** cars (and trucks) are fun for about a day (for me) then it's time for a nice quiet sleeper that also happens to blow the loud, rowdy cars off the road If I can't hear those three Holley's bellowing under the hood at WOT, I ain't happy.
 

Max Power

Active Member
Jul 31, 2003
1,774
1
36
St Paul
Jul 14, 2005
#33
  • Jul 14, 2005
  • #33
2.5" mandrels should be plenty for your application, and the Flowmaster pre-bents work pretty well. If you are just going for the look, you can weld on a 3" tailpipe.
 

0to100to0

New Member
Dec 16, 2005
100
0
0
Dec 28, 2005
#34
  • Dec 28, 2005
  • #34
revive the question: 2.5" or 3"

just read the FAQ on flowmaster's website:
http://www.flowmastermufflers.com/faq.html

matt
 

68converted

Member
Nov 19, 2003
772
0
16
Colorado
Dec 29, 2005
#35
  • Dec 29, 2005
  • #35
Hate to hijack... Will adding 1 1/2 feet of 3" tailpipe hurt performance? I am planning on doing 2.5" mandrel bent to Flowmaster 50's. I want the look of the 3" pipes, but only if will not hurt performace. Any experts want to pipe in (sorry for the pun)?
 

joesgt281

Founding Member
Oct 2, 2002
163
0
0
Katy, TX
Dec 29, 2005
#36
  • Dec 29, 2005
  • #36
Dr. Gas makes 2.5" pipes for stangs.
My buddy got them to bend up some 3" tailpipes based on the same pattern and they were happy to do it.
They went in fine on his 67 Cougar.
 

68converted

Member
Nov 19, 2003
772
0
16
Colorado
Dec 29, 2005
#37
  • Dec 29, 2005
  • #37
joesgt281 said:
Dr. Gas makes 2.5" pipes for stangs.
My buddy got them to bend up some 3" tailpipes based on the same pattern and they were happy to do it.
They went in fine on his 67 Cougar.
Click to expand...

Did they change the sound? Performace? Torque? I bet they look sick!
 

joesgt281

Founding Member
Oct 2, 2002
163
0
0
Katy, TX
Dec 29, 2005
#38
  • Dec 29, 2005
  • #38
68converted said:
Did they change the sound? Performace? Torque? I bet they look sick!
Click to expand...

I don't know what it sounded like before but he's got 3.5" pipes from the headers to an x pipe, then 3 to the back. With the windows down, it really wasn't too loud at all. He had Spintech mufflers on it too.

Performance and torque? Well it's a full-tilt 427FE making about 500 horses so I think it gets by....LOL. The ride he took me on was absolutely balls out!
 
H

HHStang

Member
May 15, 2003
566
0
16
Coastal SC
Dec 29, 2005
#39
  • Dec 29, 2005
  • #39
I'll probably fabricate one for mine out of 45's and 90's you can get from Summit.
 
G

GNN60GT500

Founding Member
Jun 18, 2002
1,218
26
48
5 car lengths in front of you!
Jan 3, 2006
#40
  • Jan 3, 2006
  • #40
Ummm, I dont mind having 3" pipes for a loud car- but if they hurt performance more then they help- I dont want them-

I run 450hp through a 2.5" exhaust and when it goes past 3000 RPM I scare old people. women, and small children.....
 
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
First Prev 2 of 2
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

B
Axleback installation
  • Bob Foos
  • Jun 13, 2026
  • 2005 - 2014 S-197 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
3
Views
95
2005 - 2014 S-197 Mustang -General/Talk- Jun 15, 2026
Noobz347
L
2001 cobra sequential tail lights
  • lking78
  • May 26, 2026
  • SVT Tech Forum
Replies
4
Views
179
SVT Tech Forum Jun 14, 2026
lking78
L
J
Exhaust manifold to Y-pipe nut & stud dimensions?
  • joeybuddy96
  • Jul 7, 2026
  • SN95 V6 Mustang Tech
Replies
2
Views
76
SN95 V6 Mustang Tech Jul 9, 2026
joeybuddy96
J
4v cobra exhaust compatibility
  • Kid wita 5oh
  • Feb 20, 2026
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
11
Views
375
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- Mar 30, 2026
squeak93
S
1965 Mustang with 80s 5.0 engine in it Power Steering hose or connection ID?
  • spearce
  • May 19, 2026
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech
Replies
2
Views
110
Classic Mustang Specific Tech Jun 8, 2026
AeroCoupe
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?