• Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech

dynacorn fender apron bolt spacing

  • Thread starter Thread starter DukeGnarley
  • Start date Start date Dec 2, 2012

DukeGnarley

Member
Apr 2, 2003
597
2
19
Auburn/Ellensburg, Wa
Dec 2, 2012
#1
  • Dec 2, 2012
  • #1
I'm about to pull out my original banged up fender aprons and radiator support out of my '65 convertible. I went to line up the new front driver side apron with the original and the fender bolt holes are in completely different spots. Has anyone come across this before? Did ford change the fender bolt spacing at some point or is the replacement apron just crap?
 
Reactions: Rick66embglcovt

horseballz

10 Year Member
Sep 30, 2009
824
19
49
Las Vegas, NV
Dec 2, 2012
#2
  • Dec 2, 2012
  • #2
From my own somewhat limited experience (1 - 68 right front apron) and all of what I've been hearing and seeing, here and on other sites, I would bet that your second guess is the most correct! Although the fact that SOME folks are at least making parts that sort of fit our cars is a heck of a lot better than us all needing to learn to become tin benders, fabricators, plastic molders, etc. Not perfect, but better than the alternative!
Just My $.02 or $.03,
Gene
 

DukeGnarley

Member
Apr 2, 2003
597
2
19
Auburn/Ellensburg, Wa
Dec 2, 2012
#3
  • Dec 2, 2012
  • #3
I guess I'm not sure what to do. I can either butcher the crap out of this new piece so the holes will line up with my old fenders, or I suppose I could replace the front and rear aprons, then get dynacorn fenders.
 

horse sence

15 Year Member
Nov 29, 1999
12,252
8,097
233
Wile Coyote's stunt double
Dec 2, 2012
#4
  • Dec 2, 2012
  • #4
i have done a lot of dynacorn approns they are usualy prety close .how far off are yours? any pics?
 

DukeGnarley

Member
Apr 2, 2003
597
2
19
Auburn/Ellensburg, Wa
Dec 2, 2012
#5
  • Dec 2, 2012
  • #5
The holes are off by at least a couple of inches. The car is in my dad's shop so i can't get any pics of it right now. There's no way my old fenders would line up with them. It's an early '65, which is why i was wondering if ford ever changed the bolt spacing.

I will get some pics tomorrow.
 

horse sence

15 Year Member
Nov 29, 1999
12,252
8,097
233
Wile Coyote's stunt double
Dec 2, 2012
#6
  • Dec 2, 2012
  • #6
bolt spacing is always the same ,that is a long ways off. are you shure they are the corect year panels?
 

DukeGnarley

Member
Apr 2, 2003
597
2
19
Auburn/Ellensburg, Wa
Dec 2, 2012
#7
  • Dec 2, 2012
  • #7
everything else about the panel looked correct. I'll get another look at it tomorrow.
 

horse sence

15 Year Member
Nov 29, 1999
12,252
8,097
233
Wile Coyote's stunt double
Dec 2, 2012
#8
  • Dec 2, 2012
  • #8
usualy at the most they are off about a 1/4 inch
 

DukeGnarley

Member
Apr 2, 2003
597
2
19
Auburn/Ellensburg, Wa
Dec 2, 2012
#9
  • Dec 2, 2012
  • #9
well i went over there and took some pictures.




It looks like the stamping is correct, but the holes are just in the wrong spots. the tag on the new piece says it's for 64-66. I think I just got a bad one.
 

Attachments

  • IMG_1213.webp
    25.8 KB · Views: 250
  • IMG_1212.webp
    29 KB · Views: 239

horse sence

15 Year Member
Nov 29, 1999
12,252
8,097
233
Wile Coyote's stunt double
Dec 2, 2012
#10
  • Dec 2, 2012
  • #10
pics dont lie ,that is completly wrong. thats a dynacorn panel?
 

DukeGnarley

Member
Apr 2, 2003
597
2
19
Auburn/Ellensburg, Wa
Dec 2, 2012
#11
  • Dec 2, 2012
  • #11
I was told that it was when I bought it, but after looking at the part number and searching around the net, I think it's someone else's. The part number on it is M116L. I bought it from a local place a few months ago. It doesn't appear that dynacorn sells the individual fender aprons for the '64-'66 cars, they only seem to have the front and rears welded together. I may go that route, but I hate to spend money on the rears if I don't really need them since mine are fine.
 

horse sence

15 Year Member
Nov 29, 1999
12,252
8,097
233
Wile Coyote's stunt double
Dec 3, 2012
#12
  • Dec 3, 2012
  • #12
if the rear panels are in good shape i would not take them out your vin # is stamped in them. the fronts have the vin to ,but atleast you will have the rear vin intact.
 

DukeGnarley

Member
Apr 2, 2003
597
2
19
Auburn/Ellensburg, Wa
Dec 3, 2012
#13
  • Dec 3, 2012
  • #13
I wasn't going to pull the rears out, just cut the front part off of the dynacorn ones. It's either that or take my chances on another one of these.
 

horse sence

15 Year Member
Nov 29, 1999
12,252
8,097
233
Wile Coyote's stunt double
Dec 3, 2012
#14
  • Dec 3, 2012
  • #14
i wish dynacorn had the front and rear panels seperate the quality is a lot better.
it will probably be worth the extra cost of the dynacorn panel anyway.the cheap aftermarket panels just are not worth it .some dont even have the holes at all. the dynacorn panels are a much beter fit and stamping,and even a heavier guage.
 

DukeGnarley

Member
Apr 2, 2003
597
2
19
Auburn/Ellensburg, Wa
Dec 3, 2012
#15
  • Dec 3, 2012
  • #15
does anyone know if the dynacorns are actually two pieces welded together, or if they are just one solid piece? If they are one solid piece then I may end up trying another set of the cheap ones.
 

horse sence

15 Year Member
Nov 29, 1999
12,252
8,097
233
Wile Coyote's stunt double
Dec 3, 2012
#16
  • Dec 3, 2012
  • #16
they are one piece, no joint in the middle
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

G
Intro and FB questions
  • gflat65
  • Nov 16, 2025
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
1
Views
212
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Nov 25, 2025
horse sence
Considering widening my rear wheels, would like to verify my thoughts on fitment
  • 2000xp8
  • Jul 9, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
20
Views
393
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jul 15, 2026
FastDriver
D
Question about EGR valve, replacement, and a part on the valve.
  • DPP
  • May 9, 2026
  • SN95 V6 Mustang Tech
Replies
1
Views
125
SN95 V6 Mustang Tech May 23, 2026
DPP
D
SURGING IDLE / NO IDLE CHECKLIST FOR 1999–2004 MUSTANG GT (4.6L 2V) - Work In Progress
  • Noobz347
  • Aug 30, 2025
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
0
Views
898
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- Aug 30, 2025
Noobz347
6
Hey all,I’m putting together a 302 for my 1968 Mustang and wanted to post the combo + some questions to make sure I’m not missing crucial
  • 68_Disgustang
  • Feb 22, 2026
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
4
Views
885
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Jun 20, 2026
gray owl
G
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?