• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech

Dyno Charts Rock! Almost stock GT!

  • Thread starter Thread starter lietuvis91
  • Start date Start date May 17, 2005
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last
L

lietuvis91

New Member
Aug 4, 2004
102
0
0
NO, LA
May 17, 2005
#1
  • May 17, 2005
  • #1
hey ya'll, so they had this dyno at the track & for $30 I got 3 runs, CHEAP! My 95 GT has an o/r h & mac headers as far as I know, so basicaly stock. Me and a friend decided to unbolt the exhaust from the h pipe to relieve some back pressure to increase hp & took out the air filter for this dyno. THe best run was 180 hp around 4100 rpm and 230tq around 3600rpm. I think we would have done better w/ the exhaust bolted up but too late now. I realize now looking at this chart that I should shift gears at about 4900rpm on this thing which is way sooner than I was doing at first. No wonder I lost to a 01 celica gts, i was switching at around 5500rpm where at my car seems to be pretty dead. Dyno charts ROCK!

... what do you guys think overall though, is this about right for HP and TQ?
 

Attachments

  • 95GT302StangSTOCK-dyno003 (Small).webp
    46.5 KB · Views: 303
M

MadHandle8169

Founding Member
May 5, 2002
432
0
0
Brick, NJ
May 17, 2005
#2
  • May 17, 2005
  • #2
Ummm...That seems pretty low even for a near stock GT. Maybe for an AODE but for a manual those are pretty bad numbers. Most people dyno in the 190s stock that I have seen. Was it a mustang dyno or a regular dyno???
 
L

lietuvis91

New Member
Aug 4, 2004
102
0
0
NO, LA
May 17, 2005
#3
  • May 17, 2005
  • #3
MadHandle8169 said:
Ummm...That seems pretty low even for a near stock GT. Maybe for an AODE but for a manual those are pretty bad numbers. Most people dyno in the 190s stock that I have seen. Was it a mustang dyno or a regular dyno???
Click to expand...

180hp is supposedly at the wheels, this was supposed to be one of the most accurate best dyno's in the country, but besides what's on the dyno sheet i don't know much else about it.
 
N

Nobody

Founding Member
May 9, 2000
2,515
0
0
Kenmore, WA
May 17, 2005
#4
  • May 17, 2005
  • #4
If that's on a Mustang dyno, then the numbers look about right, no? When we had a dyno day, Stock 5.0's were putting down 197 hp to the wheels.
 
W

wytstang

Mustang Master
Mar 14, 2004
4,988
4
78
Summerville,SC missing South Fl. weather :(
May 17, 2005
#5
  • May 17, 2005
  • #5
215-17%(drivetrain loss)=178 sound about right mathmatically, even if you use 15% it's 182.
 
Q

qwick94GT

New Member
Nov 20, 2004
108
0
0
May 17, 2005
#6
  • May 17, 2005
  • #6
MIne put down 179, and it's stock except for a MSD Distributor, plug wires and UPR cold air kit.
 

1994Vib.RedGT

Member
Aug 19, 2004
585
0
16
Denver, CO
May 17, 2005
#7
  • May 17, 2005
  • #7
with nothing but flowmaster weld ins, a K&N filter drop-in, and MAC shorty headers which is very much close to stock, my car dyno'd 192 RWHP and 257 RWTQ, so those numbers do sound a little low, for a 5-spd.
 
E

EpiKk3

New Member
Jun 4, 2004
405
0
0
May 17, 2005
#8
  • May 17, 2005
  • #8
How do you "drive" on a dyno.. never even seen one in person.. noob question perhaps but.. that's what this site's for? do you just mount up and rip through the gears or what?
 

91LX_5L

Founding Member
May 13, 2002
1,943
0
36
British Columbia
May 17, 2005
#9
  • May 17, 2005
  • #9
Think you start in 4th?
 

S/CBlack95GT

New Member
Apr 6, 2003
2,018
0
0
Tampa Palms, FL
May 17, 2005
#10
  • May 17, 2005
  • #10
EpiKk3 said:
How do you "drive" on a dyno.. never even seen one in person.. noob question perhaps but.. that's what this site's for? do you just mount up and rip through the gears or what?
Click to expand...

Put it in 4th. Then "idle" it to 2000rpms, click the dyno start button, and go to WOT until redline.
 

94MustangGT5.0

New Member
Apr 30, 2003
288
0
0
Champaign, Illinois
May 17, 2005
#11
  • May 17, 2005
  • #11
Basically it is just like driving, you start in 1st and gradually bring your car up to speed untill your reach forth (manual tranny), let it come down to idle, then just punch it and let the RPM's climb. The drums turn with resistance just like normal driving, they're not free spinning by any means.
 

DFG 5OH

Active Member
Aug 28, 2004
1,341
0
36
Louisville, KY
May 17, 2005
#12
  • May 17, 2005
  • #12
i dont see what the big deal is, some cars will put better numbers than others, not all 5.0's put down 190 at the wheels like Ford rated us. It depends on how its been maintained, how its been driven...yada yada yada...i'd be happy if i put down 180 at the wheels, i've heard of stock 5.0's with only 40K on the clock only putting down 145 at the wheels...
 
G

grrrrrrr

New Member
May 20, 2003
289
0
0
norfolk, VA
May 17, 2005
#13
  • May 17, 2005
  • #13
145 is ugly at the wheels matthiasj...

With an uncorked exhaust you should have seen a little more hp however I think the torque is about on with it uncorked. Have yo done a compression test? Might be aging a bit in that department. What was your air fuel? I know someone will be asking that eventually. I'm going to throw out a guess and say 12.7 is good... your FPR could be on the fritz... or a fuel pump.. maybe the plugs aren't gapped properly, theres a ton of reasons why the car isn't running to top form. But you're about 10 -15 off the norm I would think. Look at those easy things and you'll prolly pick up a few ponies here and there.. Also don't forget to check your air filter...
 
2

215what

New Member
Apr 14, 2005
154
0
0
NM
May 17, 2005
#14
  • May 17, 2005
  • #14
180 for 5.0 is so f***** sad
 

DFG 5OH

Active Member
Aug 28, 2004
1,341
0
36
Louisville, KY
May 17, 2005
#15
  • May 17, 2005
  • #15
i'm not talking about my ride guys...just in general...and YES it is sad...but ford only rated them at 190...thats only losing 10...
 
Q

qwick94GT

New Member
Nov 20, 2004
108
0
0
May 17, 2005
#16
  • May 17, 2005
  • #16
matthiasj said:
i'm not talking about my ride guys...just in general...and YES it is sad...but ford only rated them at 190...thats only losing 10...
Click to expand...

They were rated at 215
 

DFG 5OH

Active Member
Aug 28, 2004
1,341
0
36
Louisville, KY
May 18, 2005
#17
  • May 18, 2005
  • #17
at the wheels? It was 215 at the flywheel
 

5spd GT

"the 5.0 owns all"
Founding Member
Aug 7, 2002
9,516
6
99
Arkansas
May 18, 2005
#18
  • May 18, 2005
  • #18
They have never been officially rated by Ford "at the wheels"...and I have never heard of even the worst conditioned 5.0L dyno 145hp at the wheel...but that isn't impossible.

It really depends on the current overall tune of the car...air temp/humidity/pressure/etc...

I don't see those numbers as "off" by any means...
 
L

lietuvis91

New Member
Aug 4, 2004
102
0
0
NO, LA
May 18, 2005
#19
  • May 18, 2005
  • #19
so none of you think that the numbers may be low becasue of NO AIR FILTER WHATSOEVER and open exhaust. I think that running it open passed the h pipe w/o any mufflers could be the reason for less power, esp. the torque for sure. I drove it around like this for a while, and while it sounded damn nice, the engine reved easier but felt weaker, didn't pull as hard.
...I'm just surprised no one is commenting about that...

btw: engine's got 52k miles on it, and brand new autolites gapped at 54 to 56 i think. new msd cap & rotor and msd sprak plug wires. I do have one little issue that could have something to do w/ power, i posted about that on the 5.0tech boards.
 

GRGT1994

New Member
Sep 22, 2004
1,034
0
0
May 18, 2005
#20
  • May 18, 2005
  • #20
I think something is definitely off. Did anyone look at the dyno graph? Those are the wierdest looking curves that I have seen. They look like bubbles, completely rounded over. Nothing like any other dyno curve I have seen before.

Maybe you got a bad pass, or the dyno is crap. Ya, ya, ya they claim it's one of the most accurate. Bla, bla, bla. What would you say if you were trying to sell dyno pulls at a track day? That particular one could be toast.

Did you look at anyone else's dyno chart that day? Did their's look equally bizzare?

4,900 as a shift point sounds REALLY wrong.
 
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Y
Dyno Comparison for TFS 44cc Ported Heads vs PI Ported Heads with same VT Stage 2 Cams
  • Yel2002GTAuto
  • Oct 13, 2022
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Replies
15
Views
9K
SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech Jan 29, 2023
Yel2002GTAuto
Y
For Sale 3-owner 1987 Mustang GT, $18K obro, Lancaster CA
  • Bill Cool
  • Oct 6, 2024
  • Fox Body Mustangs For Sale (1979-93)
Replies
4
Views
2K
Fox Body Mustangs For Sale (1979-93) Oct 13, 2024
nickyb
P
Progress Thread Almost Stock Rebuild (89 GT)
  • PJV9126
  • Apr 24, 2020
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
34
Views
5K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Aug 15, 2020
kiddiccarus
Completely stock 2000 Mustang GT, Mods that actually help
  • jricolcol
  • Nov 28, 2018
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Replies
10
Views
14K
SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech Dec 3, 2018
jricolcol
A
Dyno Session almost didn't happen thank to Pro M
  • aztecgwynn
  • Apr 9, 2018
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
3
Views
2K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Apr 9, 2018
aztecgwynn
A
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?