• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech

Dyno disappointment!!

  • Thread starter Thread starter '94ChickStang
  • Start date Start date May 15, 2007
Prev
  • 1
  • …
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
First Prev 7 of 7

'94ChickStang

Member
Sep 27, 2004
301
0
17
northern ca
May 7, 2008
#121
  • May 7, 2008
  • #121
Bullitt95 said:
I've seen a comparison of dyno runs done on the same vehicle with the same engine and mods on both the Dynojet and the Mustang dyno. The weather corrected HP/TQ numbers were 6-7% lower on the Mustang dyno across the whole rpm range so that gives you an idea of the difference between them.
Click to expand...


Yeah as much as I'm gonna hate not having a dyno graph reading 300 at the wheels to brag about (unless I'm extremely lucky), I'd rather have the quality tune at this point from a quality shop....and a nicer driving car will do nicely too.
 

Black95GTS

Active Member
Jan 8, 2004
1,644
3
38
Marlborough, MA
May 7, 2008
#122
  • May 7, 2008
  • #122
'94ChickStang said:
Yeah as much as I'm gonna hate not having a dyno graph reading 300 at the wheels to brag about (unless I'm extremely lucky), I'd rather have the quality tune at this point from a quality shop....and a nicer driving car will do nicely too.
Click to expand...

I think a dyno sheet and a dollar bill will buy you a cup of coffee.

But a time slip is pure gold.

Good luck with your tune!

Adam
 

Pokageek

Active Member
Jun 10, 2005
2,767
0
46
MA, USA
May 7, 2008
#123
  • May 7, 2008
  • #123
Black95GTS said:
I think a dyno sheet and a dollar bill will buy you a cup of coffee.

But a time slip is pure gold.

Good luck with your tune!

Adam
Click to expand...

Yes but it is a key indicator as to whether your car is running as it should. For average combos a 1 to 1 ratio of rwhp to c.i. (EDIT: or within a few ponies ..like 10-20rwhp) is an acceptable expectation.
 

SVTtripleblack

New Member
Dec 4, 2007
166
0
0
Lancaster, PA
May 8, 2008
#124
  • May 8, 2008
  • #124
Wow, your situation sounds like deja vu to mine. I just had a cam installed in my car and I wanted the same shop to dyno tune it when they were done. It turns out, they tried to manually tune the car by twisting the dizzy and smashing the stock fuel pressure regulator to get more pressure. (You shouldn't even try to tune any Mustang newer than 1987 like that, and never!, ever!, take a hammer to the FPR). Your situation sounds like they couldn't or don't know how to adjust fuel pressure or timing through the ECU, so they just left the A/F at 12.0:1 and twisted the dizzy and made excuses just like the boneheads I dealt with. I ended up with a pretty bad oil leak from the lower intake manifold just to add icing to the cake. We learn from our mistakes I guess.

I'm glad to see they got it running and fixed your other problems. I have no doubt that after you lean it out a bit and get a good tuner to play around with timing tables that you will easily be over 300rwhp. I wish these kinda problems on no one. I'm also getting a dyno tune from a shop with some good credibility tomorrow.

Hope it works out for you!
 

gcomfx.com

Founding Member
Oct 22, 2002
3,690
0
56
Republic, MO
May 9, 2008
#125
  • May 9, 2008
  • #125
Drama continues it seems. Mine is back on the road for now, hopefully I can share a little luck with you.
 

gearhead302

New Member
Dec 17, 2003
18
1
0
newberry SC
May 10, 2008
#126
  • May 10, 2008
  • #126
I have the same problem!!! new motor and still pitiful power numbers on the dyno and chris tutten does my tuning so I think he is capable. I'm considering a head swap, the AFRs are a good head. whats the compression ratio? seems like the 185 makes a lot more power. I've got a small head on mine too and they are great for nitrous but the power will be low
 

'94ChickStang

Member
Sep 27, 2004
301
0
17
northern ca
May 23, 2008
#127
  • May 23, 2008
  • #127
Great news!

As usual things take longer than expected but at least it was only 2 weeks this time rather than 6 months! I'm not an empty promiser and will post my newest dyno pulls/pix once they're done next week.

My new tuner had the flu so the job got backed up (plus he only takes one car at a time as the shop does mainly race bikes). Upon stripping it down we found a couple things:

- the original shop had not measured properly and the pushrods were actually too tight and uneven, which killed a couple of my lifters and it was missing slightly.
- gas was getting into one of my vacuum hoses and he thinks my FPR got messed up and it was fattening it up

THE END RESULT was amazing! We haven't even tuned it yet as he wants me to drive it for a week first, but it feels like a totally different car and I never would have even taken it off the lot of the old shop if I knew it was supposed to drive like this...he said the dyno #'s were still decent before because the difference wasn't at WOT but in the lower RPM ranges. The throttle response is SO MUCH BETTER driving around on the street, and I cant wait to see what else we can squeeze out of it next week.

Sorry for the long post, just excited to have my car doing what it's supposed to do
 

final5-0

Mustang Master
Apr 6, 2003
6,817
12
79
DFW Texas
May 23, 2008
#128
  • May 23, 2008
  • #128
There you have it

We talked before how it would be something simple that was holding you back

As always ... one MUST pay attention to the details :Word:

Look forward to the update

Good Luck

Grady
 

hollywoodstang

Active Member
May 23, 2006
1,095
2
36
May 23, 2008
#129
  • May 23, 2008
  • #129
How was the DYNO #'s again? and what HP # are you making?
 

91foxbodygt

Member
Apr 11, 2005
76
0
7
May 30, 2009
#130
  • May 30, 2009
  • #130
what were the final dyno numbers?
 

88vert5oh

Member
Dec 27, 2004
38
3
9
NH
May 30, 2009
#131
  • May 30, 2009
  • #131
I read this all the way through only to be left hanging
 

final5-0

Mustang Master
Apr 6, 2003
6,817
12
79
DFW Texas
May 30, 2009
#132
  • May 30, 2009
  • #132
Man O Man

I remember this OLD thread

IIRC ... she posted up some results in another thread

Guess you could do a search using her name

Grady
 
S

Stopsign32v

Member
May 18, 2008
394
0
16
Gville, SC
May 31, 2009
#133
  • May 31, 2009
  • #133
drakesdad said:
Ask Grady or Jt what they think of that.......if the Maf is reading a certain amount of air in.....and the 65mm is only letting it's full capacity in.......I don't know.....may be an issue....but let someone with a better understanding fill in.... ....I don't know how much is being compensated for......

Will
Click to expand...

The MAF is only reading how much air the throttle body is letting in. How can that be an issue?
 

Zero_chance

Founding Member
May 29, 2001
1,244
7
59
Maricopa, AZ
May 31, 2009
#134
  • May 31, 2009
  • #134
When I read through this post, I didnt even realize it was over a year old until the 3rd page. Still would like to know how it all turned out.
 
Prev
  • 1
  • …
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
First Prev 7 of 7
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

C
Dyno day! # guesses?
  • clayton seiders
  • Aug 15, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
15
Views
447
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Aug 16, 2025
Scrapla347
N
Dyno Issue with 2015 GT
  • Nickos.Ford
  • Jul 11, 2025
  • The Welcome Wagon
Replies
1
Views
150
The Welcome Wagon Jul 11, 2025
Nickos.Ford
N
Engine Crankcase vent tube “relocation”?
  • Mcmahst
  • Nov 20, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
17
Views
674
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Dec 20, 2025
manicmechanic007
Y
2004 Roush - Dome Lights and radio not working
  • Yurei
  • Nov 10, 2025
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
8
Views
414
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- Nov 20, 2025
squeak93
5
Hello fellow Mustang fanatics.
  • 580HP*428Cj
  • Apr 2, 2026
  • The Welcome Wagon
Replies
4
Views
250
The Welcome Wagon Tuesday at 9:46 AM
josep4
J
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?