• Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-

Dyno results in!!!

  • Thread starter Thread starter Fomoco98
  • Start date Start date Apr 10, 2006
Status
Not open for further replies.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
Next
1 of 4 Next Last

Fomoco98

New Member
Jul 23, 2005
56
0
0
TN
Apr 10, 2006
#1
  • Apr 10, 2006
  • #1
4 Pulls to get the timming right with the Tweecer But then 311 RWP and 459 FT/LB . No Nox No power adder.
 
B

bakos24

I find there is nothing better than a tasty wiener
Nov 29, 1999
4,461
87
134
NE, OH
Apr 10, 2006
#2
  • Apr 10, 2006
  • #2
those are pretty good numbers, what mods u have?
 

Fomoco98

New Member
Jul 23, 2005
56
0
0
TN
Apr 10, 2006
#3
  • Apr 10, 2006
  • #3
Ported heads, Mahle pistons, LT headers, Offroad X pipe 3" Cat back, K&N Cone,Manley H beams.But the biggest thing is the tweecer.
 
B

bakos24

I find there is nothing better than a tasty wiener
Nov 29, 1999
4,461
87
134
NE, OH
Apr 10, 2006
#4
  • Apr 10, 2006
  • #4
 

281pony

Active Member
Aug 31, 2003
2,681
2
46
Oly, WA
Apr 10, 2006
#5
  • Apr 10, 2006
  • #5
460 torque with those mods and no power adder?
 

VPStang

Founding Member
Oct 1, 2002
346
0
16
bHAM, alabama
Apr 10, 2006
#6
  • Apr 10, 2006
  • #6
281pony said:
460 torque with those mods and no power adder?
Click to expand...


yeah, that TQ caught my attention too...
 

Crzyhrse

Active Member
Dec 23, 2004
0
2
38
Seattle, WA
Apr 10, 2006
#7
  • Apr 10, 2006
  • #7
What kind of dyno did you run on? Afew other people were getting screwy ass numbers like that. What the heck is a tweecer?
 

Fomoco98

New Member
Jul 23, 2005
56
0
0
TN
Apr 10, 2006
#8
  • Apr 10, 2006
  • #8
Sorry 459 @ 3554 RPM No BS. New Dynojet 224X ,and go to tweecr .com. Dought if you want but I'm Still smillin.
 

QDRHRSE

New Member
Dec 31, 2002
1,590
0
0
Palmdale, CA
Apr 10, 2006
#9
  • Apr 10, 2006
  • #9
I'm not sure about that tq# either. I'm glad that you're happy with the results though. The 311hp sound reasonable. Are you sure it wasn't 359tq- that would be more fitting.
 

laxdman20

New Member
Nov 20, 2003
95
0
0
Va.
Apr 10, 2006
#10
  • Apr 10, 2006
  • #10
459? Somethings not right here.
 

ProCharger GT

Member
Jun 3, 2004
153
0
16
Cleveland
Apr 10, 2006
#11
  • Apr 10, 2006
  • #11
Thats more TQ than me and I got a lot more done than you.
 

281pony

Active Member
Aug 31, 2003
2,681
2
46
Oly, WA
Apr 10, 2006
#12
  • Apr 10, 2006
  • #12
i think he gave you the dyno sheet of a guy who was on the spray.
 
D

DerekStangGT

My package is in the mail!
Feb 18, 2003
1,068
0
36
Apr 10, 2006
#13
  • Apr 10, 2006
  • #13
the hp sounds unusually high too. im guessing from your name you have a 98 GT? i dont know man, that sounds really shady. do you know the guy personally or was it the first time youve done business w/ him? im gonna guess you went to him for the first time, and now youre gonna go back b/c of those "numbers"
 

hotmustang331

Active Member
Apr 29, 2004
2,967
3
48
Bastrop,TX
Apr 10, 2006
#14
  • Apr 10, 2006
  • #14
Yep the 311 sounds right...but 459RWTQ is not right. Your WAY over 100FTLBs stronger than any other 4.6 with those mods....your a good 100#s stronger than the most powerful N/A 2Vs on the planet. The dyno was screwed..sorry That looks like the torque that peeps get on a 100shot.

Got a dyno graph?
 

Fomoco98

New Member
Jul 23, 2005
56
0
0
TN
Apr 10, 2006
#15
  • Apr 10, 2006
  • #15
The 98 mustang I have is a V6 car with a Mark VIII 32 V .The guy that done the run is a teacher at a trade school that didnt cost anything . The guy he done befor me was a C5 Vett SC .He ran 400 HP and 430 Ft/LB .Maybe the No's were wrong but they were there .
 

fluffyrunnells

New Member
Feb 4, 2006
0
0
0
new hampshire
Apr 10, 2006
#16
  • Apr 10, 2006
  • #16
crapola
 

281pony

Active Member
Aug 31, 2003
2,681
2
46
Oly, WA
Apr 10, 2006
#17
  • Apr 10, 2006
  • #17
those hp/tq numbers are just way too unproportional to be accurate.

you have a hidden nitrous system or the dyno is way off.
 

ProCharger GT

Member
Jun 3, 2004
153
0
16
Cleveland
Apr 10, 2006
#18
  • Apr 10, 2006
  • #18
Fomoco98 said:
The 98 mustang I have is a V6 car with a Mark VIII 32 V .The guy that done the run is a teacher at a trade school that didnt cost anything . The guy he done befor me was a C5 Vett SC .He ran 400 HP and 430 Ft/LB .Maybe the No's were wrong but they were there .
Click to expand...
a supercharged corvette made 400/430? was it running on 6 cylinders?
 

Tylerb59

Banned
Mar 7, 2003
1,895
0
0
Arlington, WA
Apr 10, 2006
#19
  • Apr 10, 2006
  • #19
Heck man my Cobra is boosted and only making 501 / 500 ..
 
0

01Steeda

New Member
May 29, 2005
732
0
0
Baton Rouge, LA
Apr 10, 2006
#20
  • Apr 10, 2006
  • #20
yeah I am with these guys.. 311 is very believable.. the torque is waaaay off though. kinda like my 248hp 325 tq run. did they calculate your RPM by tire and gear or did they find the spark on number 1?
 
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
Next
1 of 4 Next Last
Status
Not open for further replies.

Similar threads

What's your tow rig?
  • LILCBRA
  • May 31, 2026
  • Other Auto Tech
Replies
3
Views
90
Other Auto Tech May 31, 2026
LILCBRA
S
01 GT DRIVERS SIDE DOOR LOCK CYLINDER LINKAGE
  • Scwhitten
  • May 13, 2026
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Replies
3
Views
117
SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech Jun 19, 2026
melo.timo
M
A
SOLD For Sale: 1993 Ford Mustang Cobra Modified
  • anjteal93
  • Sep 5, 2025
  • Fox Body Mustangs For Sale (1979-93)
Replies
13
Views
1K
Fox Body Mustangs For Sale (1979-93) Oct 26, 2025
Mindseye007
X
VE Table Not Dialed? Send Me Your Datalog.
  • X-cam34
  • Feb 8, 2026
  • Digital Self-tuning Forum
  • 2 3
Replies
49
Views
1K
Digital Self-tuning Forum May 1, 2026
X-cam34
X
Progress Thread Progress Thread- From6to8's 1994 Cobra Supercharger install
  • from6to8
  • Sep 25, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 20 21 22
Replies
420
Views
9K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- May 6, 2026
from6to8
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?