• Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech

dyno results SUCKED....so pissed.....everyone with forced induction....please get in

  • Thread starter Thread starter Unreal281
  • Start date Start date Jul 12, 2006
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
Next
First Prev 2 of 3 Next Last

blackink00

I missed a shift & stole Curt's money.
Mar 30, 2005
545
0
0
Tempe, AZ
Jul 13, 2006
#21
  • Jul 13, 2006
  • #21
jasonh_86 said:
Novi 2k mongoose kit or KB mongoose kit


Prochargers
Click to expand...
STFU n00b......procharger FTW. thats what im throwing on my cobra.....when i get it
 
B

BaXTeR3221

Member
Jan 12, 2004
917
0
16
Orange County, NY
Jul 13, 2006
#22
  • Jul 13, 2006
  • #22
Sounds pretty obvious from your plan that you would be better off with a centri blower and since you seem to want procharger, go for it. It's your car dude. Personally, if it were me, i would be going with either a KB or a turbo.
 

donsbad68

Immensely Educated
Jan 4, 2003
838
0
0
Oklahoma
Jul 13, 2006
#23
  • Jul 13, 2006
  • #23
haha u call a person with a 4 digit post count a noob nice
 

Gearbanger 101

Straight Outta Locash
20+ Year Stangneter
Aug 10, 2002
9,457
1,377
234
Ontario, Canada
Jul 13, 2006
#24
  • Jul 13, 2006
  • #24
Unreal281 said:
Anywayz....my plans are to supercharge it.....then down the line.....build up the motor and crank some more boost....the car will be driven on the street....and the track about equally....i want as much power out of the car as i can get....so what would the verdict be on the blower?

Which one can hold more boost? I really DONT mind the "lag" of a centri blower.....i just want some nice power....and like i said....down the line when i build it....i'm not trying to get bummed out cause the blower can't produce enough boost....so, for the best street/strip (mainly strip) blower.....ESPECIALLY for those of you that already have it done.....which is the best????

I RARELY drive the car on the street to be honest....i drive my crx or my mom's car alot for fuel economy reasons.....

Procharger D1SC with a 3 core intercooler......

or

KB 1.7L????
Click to expand...
So many people get wrapped up on how much "boost" they're going to see with their blower, that they don't see the big picture. I’ll tell you right now, so listen very carefully……Boost means ****!!! Get that thought into your head right now, because you're just going to confuse yourself more than you already have otherwise.

What you want to concentrate on is not boost pressure, but airflow and more specifically total volume. You can see 10psi with a stock intake and small exhaust with very little effort, but it doesn't mean you're going to be making huge loads of power. Boost is a measure of restriction within the system combined with an engines ability to utilize incoming airflow, nothing more. As air stacks up within the intake, positive manifold pressure is created and this is where you see your high "boost" levels!

But, a less restrictive manifold, high flow exhaust, different set of cams, etc, etc....a guess what.....boost levels go down, but power goes up.....waaaay up!!! That’s why you see guys in ’99-up Mustangs putting down 30-50rwhp more than the ’96-’98 GT’s. Both can be pullied to see the same amount of boost on the gauge, but since the later model engine utilizes the incoming airflow so much more efficiently, the power levels are that much better.

As far as the 1.7KB and the P1SC go, both blowers are on pretty even ground with one and other as far as their ability to make horsepower is concerned. The KB might make a little more torque down low and the PISC might make a little more horsepower up high, but generally they’re on pretty even terms. Don't expect to be seeing anything more than about 450rwhp out of either blower with modest bolt ons on the street, because after that they both start showing their limitations and running out of their efficiency ranges where heat and design characteristics become a problem. This can be countered slightly by adding race gas, pulling timing, adding fuel etc, upgrading the cooling system, but those aren't issues you want to have to deal with on a daily basis and you've still got to contend with the blowers physical limitations.

Pick your horsepower level, decide where you want to see/feel the majority of said horsepower, see which set up fits best within your budget and go from there. Otherwise, listening to a bunch of replies based on personal preference is going to get you nowhere, fast!!!
 

DBMSTNG

I fantasize about it being BIG!
Founding Member
Apr 23, 2002
2,120
0
56
not quite here
Jul 13, 2006
#25
  • Jul 13, 2006
  • #25
you should be thinking KB 1.7 or a Procharger D1SC. forget about the P1SC. i've heard of more problems with the P1SC than all other blowers combined.
 

hotmustang331

Active Member
Apr 29, 2004
2,967
3
48
Bastrop,TX
Jul 13, 2006
#26
  • Jul 13, 2006
  • #26
Agreed I would avoid the P1SC...they seem to max @ around 500RWHP...about the same as the 1.7. Most 1.7 owners seem to be saving for the 2.2 when they forge the engine, so I wouldnt waste your money on it, unless you never want more than around 500 (which is ALOT) .

A 500RWHP 1.7 GT will walk a 500RWHP ATI car in the 1/4.


So basically those 2 blowers really limit you now...and the 2.2 setup is around $8400 (screw that).

Best bet IMHO is to get the novi 2000 mongoos kit from MPH.
Its like $4200 http://modularpowerhouse.com/produc...d=122&osCsid=b1cdda18cef3f67ec42f9d451899147f and will make around 400RWHP if you get a nice tune on it with your mods....thats with no IC and 10PSI. Then later you can throw on an IC and get a forged motor and basically the sky is the limit.

Do it right the first time
 

Gearbanger 101

Straight Outta Locash
20+ Year Stangneter
Aug 10, 2002
9,457
1,377
234
Ontario, Canada
Jul 13, 2006
#27
  • Jul 13, 2006
  • #27
hotmustang331 said:
A 500RWHP 1.7 GT will walk a 500RWHP ATI car in the 1/4.
Click to expand...
Exactly what proof have you got to back this statement? I've never seen anthing that would prove or disprove this. Sounds like speculation to me.
 
3

3.8L_of_Pain

New Member
Jul 4, 2004
123
0
0
Southern California -- Orange County
Jul 13, 2006
#28
  • Jul 13, 2006
  • #28
I gained 104 rwhp with the base Vortech non-intercooled kit. So if you only do this much, you would have some pleasing numbers.
 

Stang|ess

seeking cyber partner(s)
Oct 18, 2003
941
0
37
Hawaii
Jul 13, 2006
#29
  • Jul 13, 2006
  • #29
I remember reading it on this site, I believe it was tim?

when he switched from a centri blower, to a kb, his ets dropped. it may not provide as much peak power, but there's more power under the curve.

I'm just trying to spit out what I read a while back, so don't bamboozle me with your vast knowledge brian . I still have your blower thread on my favorites .
 

Gearbanger 101

Straight Outta Locash
20+ Year Stangneter
Aug 10, 2002
9,457
1,377
234
Ontario, Canada
Jul 13, 2006
#30
  • Jul 13, 2006
  • #30
Stang|ess said:
I'm just trying to spit out what I read a while back, so don't bamboozle me with your vast knowledge brian . I still have your blower thread on my favorites .
Click to expand...
I appreciate the acknowledgement.

....but that wasn't a comparison between a 1.7L KB and a P1SC in that instance, it was between a 2.2L KB and a Novi 2000....and there were a couple of other mitigating circumstances and differences between the two combinations that altered the results in favor of the Kenne Bell. Either way, it wasn't enough proof for me to consider one vastly superior over the other, but not everyone looks at it that way.
 

DropTopPony

Noob Slayer
Founding Member
Aug 13, 2002
2,570
3
48
south jersey
Jul 13, 2006
#31
  • Jul 13, 2006
  • #31
I think your numbers are pretty good...add cams and now your at 285rwhp plus...
but i like PD blowers so KB it
 

jivepepper

Founding Member
Jun 19, 2002
776
5
18
Under a Sombrero. in WV.
Jul 14, 2006
#32
  • Jul 14, 2006
  • #32
Vortech tuner kit ..........$2700.00
42lbs...........................$250.00
lightning maf.................$100.00
ebay intercooler.............$450.00
svt focus fuel pump.........$85.00
sct tuner and dyno tune...$500.00
3.1" Vortech Pulley..........$65.00
Power pipe.....................$230.00
______________________________
$400+ rwph for only........$4380.00


I made 431 with a set up like this except I have an Sct MAf.

But you have long tubes and a better Throttle body and plenum you could make more.
 

Built98GT

New Member
Oct 17, 2005
211
0
0
OKC
Jul 14, 2006
#33
  • Jul 14, 2006
  • #33
jivepepper said:
Vortech tuner kit ..........$2700.00
42lbs...........................$250.00
lightning maf.................$100.00
ebay intercooler.............$450.00
svt focus fuel pump.........$85.00
sct tuner and dyno tune...$500.00
3.1" Vortech Pulley..........$65.00
Power pipe.....................$230.00
______________________________
$400+ rwph for only........$4380.00


I made 431 with a set up like this except I have an Sct MAf.

But you have long tubes and a better Throttle body and plenum you could make more.
Click to expand...

Damn 2700 for the tuner kit! Superchargers4less.com sells the tuner kit for like 2300.
 

tomustang

Psychotic Member
Founding Member
Jun 8, 2000
3,434
2
78
McLean Hospital
Jul 14, 2006
#34
  • Jul 14, 2006
  • #34
Unreal281 said:
....is Procharger our winner?
Click to expand...
Look into a Novi2000, start out with a 8 pulley then get the motor built and just throw on a 16-18
 

timeless2

Vi Veri Veni Versum Vicus Vici
Admin Dude
Nov 29, 1999
1,366
202
154
the Shadow Gallery
Jul 14, 2006
#35
  • Jul 14, 2006
  • #35
Time to whip Brain's favorite thread out for Unreal281 to read.

http://forums.stangnet.com/showthread.php?t=572727
 
B

BaXTeR3221

Member
Jan 12, 2004
917
0
16
Orange County, NY
Jul 14, 2006
#36
  • Jul 14, 2006
  • #36
jivepepper said:
Vortech tuner kit ..........$2700.00
42lbs...........................$250.00
lightning maf.................$100.00
ebay intercooler.............$450.00
svt focus fuel pump.........$85.00
sct tuner and dyno tune...$500.00
3.1" Vortech Pulley..........$65.00
Power pipe.....................$230.00
______________________________
$400+ rwph for only........$4380.00


I made 431 with a set up like this except I have an Sct MAf.

But you have long tubes and a better Throttle body and plenum you could make more.
Click to expand...


That doesn't include the price of fabbing up everything to make the intercooler work with the vortech. They aren't exactly designed that way so i imagine it won't be cheap to make it happen.
 

SaleenGT2001

Well-Known Member
Jul 18, 2005
2,811
4
58
Four Oaks NC
Jul 14, 2006
#37
  • Jul 14, 2006
  • #37
get the mongoose novi 2k kit. with your mods you will hit around 400-420 rwhp.
 

Stang|ess

seeking cyber partner(s)
Oct 18, 2003
941
0
37
Hawaii
Jul 14, 2006
#38
  • Jul 14, 2006
  • #38
timeless2 said:
Time to whip Brain's favorite thread out for Unreal281 to read.

http://forums.stangnet.com/showthread.php?t=572727
Click to expand...



When I have kids, I'm reading that thread to them instead of Green Eggs and Ham. Dr. Seuss has nothing on Brian!
 

hotmustang331

Active Member
Apr 29, 2004
2,967
3
48
Bastrop,TX
Jul 14, 2006
#39
  • Jul 14, 2006
  • #39
Gearbanger 101 said:
Exactly what proof have you got to back this statement? I've never seen anthing that would prove or disprove this. Sounds like speculation to me.
Click to expand...


No, just ask tim. They have done alot of conversions, and EVERY one has a better ET. AN 9 times out of 10, the peak RWHP is lower. I think one was 70RWHP lower and still had a better ET.

Full boost as soon as you shift and ALL the way to red line> Half boost climing to full at redline. Its simple as that...its not rocket science lol.
 

TweekedGT

New Member
Jul 22, 2004
1,274
0
0
Alberta
Jul 14, 2006
#40
  • Jul 14, 2006
  • #40
The horsepower pissing contest still kills me. Right now my car has an intake manifold gasket leak (i'm sure that's my problem now) and I'm only seeing 6#'s of boost due to the leak down and 370rwhp and 373rwtq on a Mustang dyno after we detuned it due to scary amounts of timing and it still hauls ass. If i were you i would stick with one of the entry level blowers, KB 1.7, or Vortech V2. 400HP is a lot for a street car. The limits of these blowers at around 500rwhp is stupid amounts of power for a street car. I've been babying my car until I can get it fixed and it still breaks the tires loose in 3rd with 315's. Any 400HP car is no joke. Go with what makes you happy, save some cash and go for a Centri blower or go for major low end torque and get a KB. Either one you should be happy with. I can't imagine what 500rwhp is going to feel like when I get mine working right. That is a helluva lot of power! Don't really need it but will be fun to have.
 
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
Next
First Prev 2 of 3 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

8
Shocked by Dyno Results - 1990 Mark VII with 5.0 HO
  • 88Mark7
  • Mar 12, 2018
  • Other Auto Tech
Replies
6
Views
7K
Other Auto Tech Oct 6, 2018
I Bleed Ford Blue
Tork Tech Performance Results!
  • Flghtmstr1
  • Apr 19, 2009
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
32
Views
4K
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- Apr 23, 2009
Flghtmstr1
Back to back fox versus 94-95 TB dyno results inside!!!
  • Killercanary
  • Jun 13, 2008
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
  • 4 5 6
Replies
115
Views
13K
1994 - 1995 Specific Tech Jun 22, 2008
final5-0
95 Cobra Bolt-On Dyno Results Part II
  • SVTtripleblack
  • Feb 17, 2008
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
11
Views
4K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Feb 19, 2008
Jackie Chan
W
  • Locked
9 Second Kenne Bell Twin Screw Supercharged Custom Ford 05 Mustang GT Huge Horsepower
  • westsiderkg
  • Dec 4, 2009
  • S197 Mustangs For Sale (2005-14)
Replies
7
Views
9K
S197 Mustangs For Sale (2005-14) Apr 6, 2010
badz
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?