• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech

dyno tune

  • Thread starter Thread starter radimm
  • Start date Start date Oct 15, 2003
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
First Prev 2 of 2

radimm

Founding Member
Nov 19, 1999
187
0
0
Chicago, IL
Oct 18, 2003
#21
  • Oct 18, 2003
  • #21
ponyboy19 said:
your definetly to lean.. should be around 11-11.5:1. You really need to see how much boost your pushing. Also remember once you change your mass air, your tune that you just got is worthless. the MAF parameters will be different and will require a new tune. but it looks like the tune you have isn't too great anyways. I'm not a fan of C&L meters especially with blowers so i think your on the right track with the the new meter and headers but i would retune it and get the a/f down to around 11-11.5 and total timing around 20-22 degrees and see how it responds. you may also want to look into an ignition box at some point.
Click to expand...
Thats exactly what I'm thinkin. I will install the maf and headers. Because of the lean tune I paid for I hope to convince the tuners to give me the additional tuning free or at least with a good discount.
 

radimm

Founding Member
Nov 19, 1999
187
0
0
Chicago, IL
Oct 19, 2003
#22
  • Oct 19, 2003
  • #22
All right, hooked the boost gauge. I have seen well over 9psi at like 5800rpm. I have 8 groove 3.33 SC and 6.87 crank pulley. OK thats enough I'm not driving the car until new headers and MAF will sit in. Vacuum at idle is like 16-18 steady.
 
F

FordRangerFan17

New Member
Mar 5, 2003
65
0
0
Plainfield, Illinois
Oct 19, 2003
#23
  • Oct 19, 2003
  • #23
was that more or less boost then you had expected?
 

TheRedBlur

Active Member
Jul 7, 2003
15
0
38
seattle
Oct 19, 2003
#24
  • Oct 19, 2003
  • #24
yeah man, I'd get a 6al box, plus I've heard that the fms wires are sucky, Ilike the accel 300+, longtube headers are also a good idea. I've got an idea about the choppiness. It might be due to an unstable valvetrain, you could try a rockerstud gidle, it could also be due to lack of port scavenging throughthe exhaust
 
F

FordRangerFan17

New Member
Mar 5, 2003
65
0
0
Plainfield, Illinois
Oct 20, 2003
#25
  • Oct 20, 2003
  • #25
ya, that's what i was thinkin to, that's an awful lot of pressure from the boost being forced through those stock manifolds.


other guys fix this problem w/ an aluminum driveshaft, not too expensive at all.
 

Wknd_Warrior

TunaMan
Founding Member
Jan 31, 2000
1,564
0
36
New Jersey
Oct 20, 2003
#26
  • Oct 20, 2003
  • #26
Grn92LX said:
Wow, your about 100 hp too low! That a/f looks too lean for a "tuned" blower car. I would guess you would want the a/f to be in the 11's. A few things I would look into are, a better maf (pro m 80mm) 255 high pressure pump and 42lb injectors. With the 42's, you can ditch the fmu. Then take it to a place that knows how to tune. I have a friend w/a very similar set up and he's making over 400rwhp with a very safe tune (and his car isn't 100% perfectly tuned either)
Click to expand...
I agree.
 

radimm

Founding Member
Nov 19, 1999
187
0
0
Chicago, IL
Nov 1, 2003
#27
  • Nov 1, 2003
  • #27
I don't understand why I'm seeing over 9psi of boost with intake and heads. I think when stock pullies on a stock engine are rated for 8-10psi shouldn't the boost be lower on a car with heads and intake? I spliced the boost gauge into vacuum line going to ignition retard box is this correct?
BTW installed BBK unequal shorty headers last week the new MAF is due tomorrow and then back on the dyno.
 

radimm

Founding Member
Nov 19, 1999
187
0
0
Chicago, IL
Dec 31, 2003
#28
  • Dec 31, 2003
  • #28
Got new update!!
Installed 80mm ProM MAF and shorty headers. New dyno numbers are 330rwhp/351rwtq SAE with A/F 12.2. So I picked over 18hp. But I still need more HP.
I did a lot of homework research since then. I was thinking - when I changed heads on my car two years ago I put old valvetrain back exactly in the same order. I mean rockers with pedestal shims and pushrods in exact positions as were before. I didn't check for correct geometry because I was not familiar with that. It most likely means valves are not adjusted right. That is one problem I developed with my own stupidity. The other - when I bought the car there were no cats I didn't know that. To make this long story short - shop installed two cats but only one has the inlet for air pump connected the other is plugged I suspect this one or booth of them are clogged. That is maybe why I have seen over 11psi of boost at 6000 once or twice - I'm not taking it that far again. So now I'm looking for cheap off road X or H pipe and 1.6 roller rockers (Scorpion or FMS). I will adjust them this time since I will have the valve covers off and install the MSD BTM ignition I purchased (thank you Shawn). Then back again dyno to see what happend.
 

radimm

Founding Member
Nov 19, 1999
187
0
0
Chicago, IL
Apr 3, 2004
#29
  • Apr 3, 2004
  • #29
I got an update, it's been a while since I posted last time here. I usually hang on Corral forum but it is a bit slow tonight. I had the car on the dyno again. Jerry from Fordchip did the tuning. They did just one baseline run, then some keystrokes on a computer then second run was 409.1rwhp and 394.1rwtq. Jerry is the man and he knows what is he doing! I newer believed in chips but this experience makes me believe now. All I can say is WOW what a difference.
 

ponyboy19

Founding Member
May 24, 2000
1,640
0
36
Apr 3, 2004
#30
  • Apr 3, 2004
  • #30
nice improvement.. what was your a/f ratio and total timing,
 

radimm

Founding Member
Nov 19, 1999
187
0
0
Chicago, IL
Apr 3, 2004
#31
  • Apr 3, 2004
  • #31
Thanks. The A/F is 12.1 I don't know the total timing. Was so happy with the numbers so I forgot to ask.
 

88Koupe

Member
Jul 1, 2002
32
0
6
Wild Wonderful WV
Apr 3, 2004
#32
  • Apr 3, 2004
  • #32
it is my opinion that the choppiness in your graph is because the computer does not know what to do with your combination. I have a custom burned chip in my car, tuned by randy haywwod and it was choppy when he started the tune and he smoothed the graph by changing timing and fuel every 100 rpm's. (It took 7 pulls on the dyno.) A custom burned chip was a miracle for me. My car is smooth and responsive. Stock heads and valves with port and polish made 338 rwhp and 360 rwtorque. I aslo do not have a radical cam it is the trick flow stage one cam. I watched the boost gage on the pulls and at appx 56-5700 rpm i was making 7lbs of boost. if you were near nc, Randy is the only one i would trust with the tune of my car.

i have been wrong alot, these are just my thoughts.
 
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
First Prev 2 of 2
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

D
1989 rebuild tune?
  • Duramax6
  • May 17, 2024
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
3
Views
617
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- May 17, 2024
Duramax6
D
G
2001 Mustang Gt
  • gilmo5
  • Sep 10, 2024
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
1
Views
322
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- Sep 10, 2024
gilmo5
G
For Sale 94 Cobra 408w AOD Project For Sale
  • Labora
  • Oct 11, 2024
  • SN95 Mustangs For Sale (1994-04)
Replies
1
Views
1K
SN95 Mustangs For Sale (1994-04) Apr 7, 2025
Labora
Y
Dyno Comparison for TFS 44cc Ported Heads vs PI Ported Heads with same VT Stage 2 Cams
  • Yel2002GTAuto
  • Oct 13, 2022
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Replies
15
Views
9K
SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech Jan 29, 2023
Yel2002GTAuto
Y
SOLD 1993 Mustang Cobra / 114K miles / Modified / Fort Lauderdale, Florida.
  • Naja
  • Oct 4, 2023
  • Fox Body Mustangs For Sale (1979-93)
Replies
5
Views
12K
Fox Body Mustangs For Sale (1979-93) Feb 26, 2025
Naja
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?