• Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech

ebay fastfoward

  • Thread starter Thread starter 67coupestang
  • Start date Start date Dec 14, 2003

do you like the ebay fastback

  • yuck

    Votes: 5 9.6%
  • whatever, to each his own

    Votes: 16 30.8%
  • wish it were mine

    Votes: 31 59.6%

  • Total voters
    52
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last

67coupestang

Founding Member
May 31, 2002
509
2
19
Dec 14, 2003
#1
  • Dec 14, 2003
  • #1
anybody else following this at all

www.ebaymotors.com/fastback

I definately dont like the wheels the front wheels have too much backspacing. I dont like deleting the backup lights, I think if they were going to remove all the rest of the chrome they should have painted the rear bumper to match as well... thumbs down im my opinion
 
D

D.Hearne

New Member
Sep 29, 2000
11,730
6
0
south louisiana
Dec 14, 2003
#2
  • Dec 14, 2003
  • #2
The whole car looks better than the "elenwhore's" except for the wheels. too big too shiny. they should lose the side scoops too.
 
T

The Hopkinator

New Member
Dec 5, 2002
146
0
0
NC
Dec 15, 2003
#3
  • Dec 15, 2003
  • #3
That car is as close to an Eleanor ripoff as you can get. They shouldve just dropped the bucks and made one, not some poor attempt at it. Eleanor blows that thing out of the water. And those doper rims need to be thrown in the Atlantic ocean.
 

modmach1

Member
Jan 16, 2003
239
4
16
Norway
Dec 15, 2003
#4
  • Dec 15, 2003
  • #4
I love it. Trepanier has done it once again. The rearend is a little boring, but the wheels are grate ! And i love that interior. The gray stripe over the car is also much better then the Shelby/Viper stripes





It`s SO MUCH better looking than the Eleanors. And that front spoiler is Way Cool
 

67coupestang

Founding Member
May 31, 2002
509
2
19
Dec 15, 2003
#5
  • Dec 15, 2003
  • #5
another thing i want to know is.. the front tire camber... is that the way the fat man fab is, or is it poor alignment... i realize it will help cornering, but if daily driven your tires would be SHOT!!!
 

66 BLAKE 96

Native Texican
Founding Member
Feb 16, 2001
4,810
0
0
Cowtown
Dec 15, 2003
#6
  • Dec 15, 2003
  • #6
Great looking car with some real craftsmanship in it. There are certainly things I would change about it, but all things considered, good stuff.
 
J

jae902

Member
Feb 11, 2003
175
0
16
Dec 15, 2003
#7
  • Dec 15, 2003
  • #7
I love the way it looks. I wouldn't change anything about it, except maybe the tail pipes. The engine bay is a plus, very clean, especially the radiator support. The wheels suit the car i think, i think camber on the tires look like that because its at its lowest point. It has air ride, so if he raised it a bit, it would straighten out. This car has the retro look, applying a modern look to an old car. Those of you that like the classic look, i can understand not liking this car. But a stock classic is boring in my opinion.
 

eric n

Founding Member
Jul 14, 2001
875
2
19
Bakersfield, CA
Dec 15, 2003
#8
  • Dec 15, 2003
  • #8
66 BLAKE 96 said:
Great looking car with some real craftsmanship in it. There are certainly things I would change about it, but all things considered, good stuff.
Click to expand...


Gotta agree with blake, everything is executed with such precision and quality that I can't help but be wowed by it. I don't hate the wheels, but would likely go some other way. Amazingly well executed car. Had to cost well over $23.00 cash.
 

6Stang7

New Member
Jun 1, 2003
1,470
0
0
Livermore, CA
Dec 15, 2003
#9
  • Dec 15, 2003
  • #9
It's a sick car, but I would rather have a stock fastback over that. Just my .02

-Shaun
 

1320stang

Founding Member
Nov 13, 1998
4,329
23
89
Edmond, Oklahoma
Dec 15, 2003
#10
  • Dec 15, 2003
  • #10
The Hopkinator said:
That car is as close to an Eleanor ripoff as you can get. They shouldve just dropped the bucks and made one, not some poor attempt at it. Eleanor blows that thing out of the water. And those doper rims need to be thrown in the Atlantic ocean.
Click to expand...

Is this because of the color? The scoops are all handmade, and the Shelby's had scoops, so why is it not a Shelby ripoff? And why not throw them in the Pacific Ocean, it's deeper, you got something against the left coast?!?!

I agree about the rims, I like them, but I think they're too big. Overall I like the car better than Eleanor. Man, what if that would have been a Shelby they did that to...
 

mdjay

Premium Sponsor
Dec 9, 2003
896
0
16
Las Vegas, NV
Dec 15, 2003
#11
  • Dec 15, 2003
  • #11
It's a beauty! Great sanitary job, great workmanship. More pics of this in our photo gallery...

http://www.mustangdepot.com/Media/gallery_of_photos.htm
 
R

Randy'65

Founding Member
Feb 1, 2000
352
0
17
Richmond, VA
Dec 15, 2003
#12
  • Dec 15, 2003
  • #12
I like it. If you're the kind of guy that likes chopped tops, shaved handles and the like, then you've gotta like this car. If you only like cars the way the manufacturers made them, then you probably don't.
 

68GEETEE

5 Year Member
Nov 21, 2003
481
5
38
Texas, USA
Dec 15, 2003
#13
  • Dec 15, 2003
  • #13
wheels suck, what good is a car that you CANT DRIVE ANYWHERE??????
 
G

gp001

Founding Member
Jun 30, 2001
4,401
0
66
So. Cal.
Dec 15, 2003
#14
  • Dec 15, 2003
  • #14
Does seem to be an "Elenore" like ripoff to me too. Maybe in this day and age they should have used a different year & color. Seems like it couldn't really move much. Do they have any performace specs for it? Or is it more of a concept car to showcase all the crap you can buy on E-bay?
 
T

The Hopkinator

New Member
Dec 5, 2002
146
0
0
NC
Dec 16, 2003
#15
  • Dec 16, 2003
  • #15
1320stang said:
Is this because of the color? The scoops are all handmade, and the Shelby's had scoops, so why is it not a Shelby ripoff? And why not throw them in the Pacific Ocean, it's deeper, you got something against the left coast?!?!

I Man, what if that would have been a Shelby they did that to...
Click to expand...

Wow. Picking a fight ? ..Be careful...
.. Lets look at your response analytically.
The color ? Perhaps. It IS a 67 Fastback. It IS painted grey .
The Scoops? These look more like Eleanor scoops than Shelby scoops.They practically ARE Eleanor scoops...
And the pacific ocean thing? Do I have anything against the "left coast" ?
Well,, the WEST coast itself, no, . Im not too fond of places like Oklahoma though , since you asked..

And as far as the Shelby snipe, well here we go again . However I think this time, since I dont believe Im dealing with an intelligence level that will ever fully grasp the fact that there are NO PERMANENT MODS DONE, I shant attempt yet ANOTHER explanation.
 

1320stang

Founding Member
Nov 13, 1998
4,329
23
89
Edmond, Oklahoma
Dec 16, 2003
#16
  • Dec 16, 2003
  • #16
The Hopkinator said:
Wow. Picking a fight ? ..Be careful...
.. Lets look at your response analytically.
The color ? Perhaps. It IS a 67 Fastback. It IS painted grey .
The Scoops? These look more like Eleanor scoops than Shelby scoops.They practically ARE Eleanor scoops...
And the pacific ocean thing? Do I have anything against the "left coast" ?
Well,, the WEST coast itself, no, . Im not too fond of places like Oklahoma though , since you asked..

And as far as the Shelby snipe, well here we go again . However I think this time, since I dont believe Im dealing with an intelligence level that will ever fully grasp the fact that there are NO PERMANENT MODS DONE, I shant attempt yet ANOTHER explanation.
Click to expand...

I'm just poking fun at you Hop, I couldn't find the "tounge in cheek" smilie.

 

NKau

Founding Member
Dec 15, 2001
1,346
0
37
Jefferson, WI
Dec 16, 2003
#17
  • Dec 16, 2003
  • #17
There's nothing I hate about it except for the rims. Good looking rim design, but anything over 17's look retarded on small cars like a mustang. I'm all about lowering a car to handle, but the wheels also look stupid tucked up as far as they are in the wheelwells. If the rims were smaller maybe it wouldn't look quite as idiotic.........
Otherwise I think it's a pretty awesome car.
 

Red Barchetta

Founding Member
Mar 7, 2002
761
0
17
Behind the Orange Curtain
Dec 16, 2003
#18
  • Dec 16, 2003
  • #18
I don't think it really looks like eleanor. The car is painted Smoke Silver, which does look simlar to eleanore in the photos, but in person it is definitely different. There was an eleanor clone at SEMA not too far away from the Ebay booth where the Fastforward car was displayed. The differences were obvious. The scoops are anything but eleanore. To give a better example, check out the lower scoops:



The lower scoop on eleanor starts very close to the door opening, whereas the Trepanier car is further back. Also, there is no upper scoop on the Trepanier car. They removed the outer portion of the air extractors and filled the opening with a plate to give it a recessed look.

And those are just a few of the differences on the outside. There's not enough time to describe in detail everything that was done under the hood or to the interior.

Another big difference is Troy doesn't use any fiberglass. It's all steel. He also removed all the trim and shaved the door handles. It's a well done "street rod" style Mustang.

Other than it being a '67 fastback and somewhat of a grayish color, it is anything but an eleanor ripoff.
 

sand1man

Founding Member
May 14, 2002
299
0
0
Charlotte, N C
Dec 16, 2003
#19
  • Dec 16, 2003
  • #19
overall I like it very clean, but those wells would look much better on a escalade
 
T

The Hopkinator

New Member
Dec 5, 2002
146
0
0
NC
Dec 16, 2003
#20
  • Dec 16, 2003
  • #20
1320stang said:
I'm just poking fun at you Hop, I couldn't find the "tounge in cheek" smilie.

Click to expand...

Im sorry then, 1320 , Im just used to being attacked so frequently over the Shelby thing, I never know when someones razzin me or launching missiles

Im slow like that ya know !

Sorry again mate !
 
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Progress Thread Sask84gt's 84 GT - Questions and Progress Thread
  • Sask84gt
  • Oct 13, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
22
Views
482
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jun 6, 2026
Sask84gt
M
Progress Thread mkk50's Progress Thread
  • mkk50
  • Aug 4, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
19
Views
675
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Sep 22, 2025
Noobz347
SURGING IDLE / NO IDLE CHECKLIST FOR 1996–1998 MUSTANG GT (4.6L 2V) - Work In Progress
  • Noobz347
  • Aug 30, 2025
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
0
Views
674
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- Aug 30, 2025
Noobz347
For Sale 3-owner 1987 Mustang GT, $18K obro, Lancaster CA
  • Bill Cool
  • Oct 6, 2024
  • Fox Body Mustangs For Sale (1979-93)
Replies
4
Views
2K
Fox Body Mustangs For Sale (1979-93) Oct 13, 2024
nickyb
Progress Thread 1993 LX Hatch Progress
  • Mac131
  • Aug 24, 2024
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 9 10 11
Replies
210
Views
12K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Monday at 11:19 AM
Mac131
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?