• Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-

edelbrock 4.6 victor jr.?

  • Thread starter Thread starter 98COBRA281
  • Start date Start date Aug 8, 2009
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last

98COBRA281

10 Year Member
Nov 24, 2007
1,348
30
59
Port St. Lucie, Florida
Aug 8, 2009
#1
  • Aug 8, 2009
  • #1
i have been looking at this intake but i cannot find alot of people with them, has anybody heard anything about these? or know somebdy with one, im trying to gain a another 20ish+ rwhp, i know that this is a high rpm intake with its short runners, my car revs over 6k easy so i think it woud go good with my setup

any info is appreciated:SNSign:
 

96SCstang

New Member
Jul 22, 2006
228
0
0
novi, MI
Aug 8, 2009
#2
  • Aug 8, 2009
  • #2
i'm not sure but isn't the victor jr. a carb. intake? i didnt think there was one for fuel injection
 

98COBRA281

10 Year Member
Nov 24, 2007
1,348
30
59
Port St. Lucie, Florida
Aug 8, 2009
#3
  • Aug 8, 2009
  • #3
96SCstang said:
i'm not sure but isn't the victor jr. a carb. intake? i didnt think there was one for fuel injection
Click to expand...

there EFI and card versions, but the EFI kit needs after market fuel rails, and a adapter to fit upper plenuim/tb
 
B

blubullett

Member
Jun 22, 2006
535
6
18
Modesto, CA
Aug 8, 2009
#4
  • Aug 8, 2009
  • #4
Not even worth it. I would get any other intake before I got that one.
 

deftsound

Please ask me how much my supercharger cost
Apr 6, 2004
945
1
39
Texas City TX
Aug 8, 2009
#5
  • Aug 8, 2009
  • #5
on an n/a car you're not going to see much in the way of gains with one of the aftermarket intakes on the market. I would look for a good deal on a used bullit intake
 

98COBRA281

10 Year Member
Nov 24, 2007
1,348
30
59
Port St. Lucie, Florida
Aug 8, 2009
#6
  • Aug 8, 2009
  • #6
blubullett said:
Not even worth it. I would get any other intake before I got that one.
Click to expand...

why?
 

Blackone51

Member
Oct 30, 2008
201
2
16
Aug 8, 2009
#7
  • Aug 8, 2009
  • #7
I have a dyno aftermarket parts book and the bullitT intake gained a whopping 5 hp and 1 torque. Not worth it.
 
B

blubullett

Member
Jun 22, 2006
535
6
18
Modesto, CA
Aug 8, 2009
#8
  • Aug 8, 2009
  • #8
Short runner, all the garbage you would have to swap, I would bet you would probably loose power untill 5500. For that to be worth it you would need a bunch of boost or some crazy cam timing. If you had 20lbs of boost though I bet it would flow a gang of air, and it would probably be easy to port. That is the sort of intake you run on a 427ci windsor with a Novi 2000 on it. You need some cubic inches to make up for the loss in low end torque.

Blackone51, Whats the name of the book you have? I would like to look at something like that.
 

98COBRA281

10 Year Member
Nov 24, 2007
1,348
30
59
Port St. Lucie, Florida
Aug 8, 2009
#9
  • Aug 8, 2009
  • #9
blubullett said:
Short runner, all the garbage you would have to swap, I would bet you would probably loose power untill 5500. For that to be worth it you would need a bunch of boost or some crazy cam timing. If you had 20lbs of boost though I bet it would flow a gang of air, and it would probably be easy to port. That is the sort of intake you run on a 427ci windsor with a Novi 2000 on it. You need some cubic inches to make up for the loss in low end torque.

Blackone51, Whats the name of the book you have? I would like to look at something like that.
Click to expand...

all you need is an adapter, for the upper plenium, and fuel rails.............
 
B

blubullett

Member
Jun 22, 2006
535
6
18
Modesto, CA
Aug 8, 2009
#10
  • Aug 8, 2009
  • #10
How about the loosing power till 5500 part then.

But it is your car so do what you want. Don't be sad when you have no low end left though.

That intake was made to swap 4.6's with carbs into old cars. They just started making the adapter because they relized that none in thier right mind would put a 4.6 in an old car with they could have something with more cubic inches.
 

Tim2002GT

Founding Member
Apr 10, 2002
635
4
29
Tulsa, Oklahoma
Aug 8, 2009
#11
  • Aug 8, 2009
  • #11
On a track car that sees mostly 4-6500 rpm, I think it would work nicely. Throw in some boost or some nitrous, which you already have, and you'll really see some gains.

Everyone is quick to knock something without ever trying it. I say, if you have the coin, do it.
 

Tim2002GT

Founding Member
Apr 10, 2002
635
4
29
Tulsa, Oklahoma
Aug 8, 2009
#12
  • Aug 8, 2009
  • #12
blubullett said:
That intake was made to swap 4.6's with carbs into old cars. They just started making the adapter because they relized that none in thier right mind would put a 4.6 in an old car with they could have something with more cubic inches.
Click to expand...

When they originally released the intake they had multiple versions. One is a standard carb flange, and the other is designed for their own Edelbrock elbow. The adapter the op is referring to is so you can run any of the current elbows on that intake. I don't believe Edelbrock is making the adapter he is referring to.
 

98COBRA281

10 Year Member
Nov 24, 2007
1,348
30
59
Port St. Lucie, Florida
Aug 8, 2009
#13
  • Aug 8, 2009
  • #13
yes, MMR makes the adapter, i read a reveiw from a N/A guy on MMR's forums, and he said he dropped 2 tenths just by putting it on, with out tuning and felt no loss in low end tq
 

y2k02

Member
Apr 19, 2004
83
0
17
Aug 9, 2009
#14
  • Aug 9, 2009
  • #14
I gained tq and hp with the Edelbrock over the ported Hardballer'r I had. It is about the cheapest intake also.
 

98COBRA281

10 Year Member
Nov 24, 2007
1,348
30
59
Port St. Lucie, Florida
Aug 9, 2009
#15
  • Aug 9, 2009
  • #15
thanks, ive was hoping there was some one with one, how much did you gain over the hardballer?, and did you lose any low end? and what adaper plate do you have?
 

kuwait

Member
Mar 31, 2005
194
0
17
Aug 9, 2009
#16
  • Aug 9, 2009
  • #16
y2k02 said:
I gained tq and hp with the Edelbrock over the ported Hardballer'r I had. It is about the cheapest intake also.
Click to expand...

any hood clearance issue with this intake y2k02 ?

also would it be good for boosted applications?

sorry for the hijacking 98COBRA281 , and y2k02 that engine bay looks so sexy View attachment 249248
 

98COBRA281

10 Year Member
Nov 24, 2007
1,348
30
59
Port St. Lucie, Florida
Aug 9, 2009
#17
  • Aug 9, 2009
  • #17
^thats fine

they claim that theres no clearence issues, and his car is TT, so im sure it works great with F/I
 

y2k02

Member
Apr 19, 2004
83
0
17
Aug 9, 2009
#18
  • Aug 9, 2009
  • #18
I gained 12rw/40+tq. I have a C4 transmission, so when I go wot the rpms jump to atleast 4000. I did have to clearence the stock hood to clear it. I used the MMR adapter plate.
Here is video with the 305ci big bore in the car now.
YouTube - Spooling twin turbos
 

Tim2002GT

Founding Member
Apr 10, 2002
635
4
29
Tulsa, Oklahoma
Aug 9, 2009
#19
  • Aug 9, 2009
  • #19
What kind of clearancing did you have to do for the stock hood? Those are some nice tq gains!
 

98COBRA281

10 Year Member
Nov 24, 2007
1,348
30
59
Port St. Lucie, Florida
Aug 9, 2009
#20
  • Aug 9, 2009
  • #20
well i have been doing some searching, and im 99% sure im going to stay all motor, and do the following

4:30's in the rear
edelbrock intake(maybe do some light porting on it)
mmr adapter plate
mmr fuel rails
jlt ram air intake
90mm lighting MAF
port C&L upper plenuim

and retune and shoot for 330+rwhp, 6500 rpms, and low 12's with some more suspension work, out of an all motor NPI!
 
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

M
4.6 2v ready to go in.
  • Michael007
  • Apr 22, 2024
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
3
Views
1K
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- Apr 23, 2024
Mustang5L5
SN95 Desktop 363 Engine Combination - Looking for input
  • WhiteCobra95
  • Sep 8, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
11
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Oct 6, 2025
Habu135
Which one of these 3 intakes make the most sense for my 331 combo
  • from6to8
  • Jul 25, 2024
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Replies
7
Views
2K
1994 - 1995 Specific Tech Jul 26, 2024
AeroCoupe
Engine HELP - 351W Based Build Under Stock Hood
  • thinkfaster
  • Oct 17, 2024
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
13
Views
2K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Dec 31, 2025
Qtrhrse23
Q
D
PI Intake on 5.4?
  • Dbabb
  • Nov 3, 2020
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
1
Views
4K
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- Feb 17, 2022
Mad Mod
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?