• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech

Edelbrock and E cam Clearance

  • Thread starter Thread starter Paul Perreca
  • Start date Start date Sep 2, 2005

Paul Perreca

New Member
Mar 30, 2005
1,085
0
0
Sep 2, 2005
#1
  • Sep 2, 2005
  • #1
I ordered 1.6 roller rockers, I have been assured they will fit, how about 1.7's?? I got Ford Racing Chrome Valve Covers....... I can change my order whenever I want, my parts guy is cool.... Would it be well worth the extra 0.1 lift??? THANKS AGAIN

Paul Perreca
 

DMAN302

My mom says thanks for the pearl necklace.
Nov 8, 2003
2,120
2
59
windsor, Canada
Sep 2, 2005
#2
  • Sep 2, 2005
  • #2
I would ALWAYS check PVC before I torque down the heads...regardless if someone "told me" clearance would be fine, have you builder (or you) clay the heads to check clearance. Also I'd want to check and see if the valve covers will clear your intake and or TB..I have heard the FMS covers can in some styles create clearance issues. I have the ribed/polished FMS "Mustang" covers..I needed to grind out the baffles to accomodate the 1.6RR's.
 

5.02GO

Founding Member
Jun 26, 2001
308
0
16
Ky, Blue Sky Country
Sep 2, 2005
#3
  • Sep 2, 2005
  • #3
Running Edelbrock Performers with Crane 1.7's, E-cam & stock valve covers.

No problems........
 

ill advised

Member
Apr 29, 2003
656
10
19
West L.A.
Sep 3, 2005
#4
  • Sep 3, 2005
  • #4
The baffle on my stock valve cover had to be removed but otherwise no problems with the 1.7s. Definitely want to check to be sure.
 

txstang84

15 Year Member
May 21, 2005
1,639
42
69
Tuscola, tx
Sep 3, 2005
#5
  • Sep 3, 2005
  • #5
I'm with DMAN...always ck your clearance...IIRC, you're supposed to have 0.080" intake valve clearance and 0.100" exh-someone cofirm (?)

the 1.7's will give you 0.529" lift at the valve compared to 0.498" with the 1.6's and the E cam. We did the same setup on one of my pals cars. He was running speed pro cast pistons (yeah, I know-omg cast pistons) and the 1.7's with an E and no interference issues
 

2000xp8

SN Certified Technician
Aug 8, 2003
8,016
1,613
194
NJ
Sep 3, 2005
#6
  • Sep 3, 2005
  • #6
Change the valve springs if you are using stock heads. Valve springs get old and tired, and this will prevent valve float.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

6
Hey all,I’m putting together a 302 for my 1968 Mustang and wanted to post the combo + some questions to make sure I’m not missing crucial
  • 68_Disgustang
  • Feb 22, 2026
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
4
Views
701
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Yesterday at 9:06 AM
gray owl
G
9
Forced Induction Prepping for supercharger on non-stock build
  • 91fox427
  • Nov 25, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
7
Views
373
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Jan 5, 2026
Qtrhrse23
Q
S
Holley High-ram tuning settings
  • spencergt66
  • Apr 1, 2026
  • Digital Self-tuning Forum
  • 2
Replies
28
Views
492
Digital Self-tuning Forum Friday at 2:00 PM
spencergt66
S
Engine Finishing up 331 build
  • RedFury5.0
  • Mar 21, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
9
Views
566
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Apr 20, 2025
RedFury5.0
Engine Valve and or rocker noise .....new to this but dont mind getting my hands dirty.
  • mustang matt 1993
  • Jun 29, 2024
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
16
Views
2K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Jul 1, 2024
rednotch
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?