• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech

Edelbrock/FMS vale covers

  • Thread starter Thread starter 281pony
  • Start date Start date Nov 10, 2004

281pony

Active Member
Aug 31, 2003
2,681
2
46
Oly, WA
Nov 10, 2004
#1
  • Nov 10, 2004
  • #1
im looking for a nicer set of valve covers for my car. i cant seem to find any that claim to work or will work, so im looking for some first hand information.

i had a set of the "cobra" ones which i liked, but they wouldnt clear 1.6 rockers and had a TON of little pegs inside them making it too much of a PITA to modify.

im looking at some edelbrock covers or some of the FMS ones. which ones will work without intake spacers and clear 1.6 rockers still? i have an edelbrock performer rpm intake.

i have the edelbrock catalog and part #4460/#4260 valve covers claim to work. can anyone confirm or post pics of your aftermarket valve covers. thanks
 

NCStang86

New Member
Mar 21, 2004
80
0
0
selma,nc
Nov 10, 2004
#2
  • Nov 10, 2004
  • #2
The only ones I know of that will work w/out an intake spacer are stock ones that are modified. The FMS ones might work
 

281pony

Active Member
Aug 31, 2003
2,681
2
46
Oly, WA
Nov 10, 2004
#3
  • Nov 10, 2004
  • #3
alright. thats kind of what i was getting down to.

my stock ones were painted an ugly ass blue when i got them, and i spray painted them again black. they still look horrible though so i wanted some better ones.

guess ill stick with stock replacements.
 

DMAN302

My mom says thanks for the pearl necklace.
Nov 8, 2003
2,120
2
59
windsor, Canada
Nov 10, 2004
#4
  • Nov 10, 2004
  • #4
Have the polished FMS "mustang" ones I had some grinding to do but cleared by scorpions nicely with cork gasket.
 

Fishhawk

New Member
Jun 10, 2004
281
0
0
Michigan City, Indiana
Nov 10, 2004
#5
  • Nov 10, 2004
  • #5
I have the Ford Racing valve covers. No modifying needed. Cleared my 1.6 rollers and bolted right on.
 

runningmole

Founding Member
Jun 24, 2002
1,127
0
36
San Diego, CA
Nov 10, 2004
#6
  • Nov 10, 2004
  • #6
Here are mine. I have an old style Performer RPM intake on it. No intake spacer, but I don't know how much taller the RPM is vs stock intake


 

Attachments

  • 42501327_1-med.webp
    29 KB · Views: 143
  • IMG_0213.webp
    55.6 KB · Views: 143

281pony

Active Member
Aug 31, 2003
2,681
2
46
Oly, WA
Nov 10, 2004
#7
  • Nov 10, 2004
  • #7
thanks for the pics.

so it looks like the fms style will work. that is the same intake i have also.
 

5spd GT

"the 5.0 owns all"
Founding Member
Aug 7, 2002
9,516
6
99
Arkansas
Nov 10, 2004
#8
  • Nov 10, 2004
  • #8
Well I'm not for sure which "Cobra" valve covers your referring to...but I bought the Ford Racing covers that say Cobra on them for $150 from Summit...

They clear my 1.6 Scorpion stud-mounted rockers and I have OEM valve cover gaskets (less clearance than cork) and it clears under my Performer intake without a spacer...Alls I did was take off the oil baffle and ground down the 3 pegs the baffle bolted to and put them on and everything cleared...they slightly hit the accelartor cable bracket but rest right against it...and they look good to...
 

281pony

Active Member
Aug 31, 2003
2,681
2
46
Oly, WA
Nov 10, 2004
#9
  • Nov 10, 2004
  • #9
they were the black and silver striped "cobra" valve covers. same ones summit sells made by fms.

these had like 30-35 pegs in each valve cover, all sticking down too far to use any rocker with. i used a dye grinder and a dremel for maybe 30 minutes and got through like half of one peg. said screw it and sold them brand new.
 

5spd GT

"the 5.0 owns all"
Founding Member
Aug 7, 2002
9,516
6
99
Arkansas
Nov 10, 2004
#10
  • Nov 10, 2004
  • #10
88SC_GT said:
they were the black and silver striped "cobra" valve covers. same ones summit sells made by fms.

these had like 30-35 pegs in each valve cover, all sticking down too far to use any rocker with. i used a dye grinder and a dremel for maybe 30 minutes and got through like half of one peg. said screw it and sold them brand new.
Click to expand...

That is the ones I have...and they didn't have that many pegs in each valve cover...maybe total...on mine...

They cleared mine? with less dremeling and skinny OEM gasket...
 

281pony

Active Member
Aug 31, 2003
2,681
2
46
Oly, WA
Nov 10, 2004
#11
  • Nov 10, 2004
  • #11
they were in rows the entire length of the covers. probably a little over half an inch. spaced closer together then each rocker sits on the heads.

i tried making them work, nothing would go through the stems either. i have access to a manual mill i could have used, but i just said screw it at the time. i would rather have the "ford racing" style anyways.

with a cork gasket (which i use) i think ill go with the ford racing ones and hope it all works out.
 

ninety15.0

New Member
Mar 10, 2004
1,336
0
0
Nov 10, 2004
#12
  • Nov 10, 2004
  • #12
Im building a new 306 this winter. Im using P&P E7's with either 1.6 or 1.7 roler rockers. Am i going to be able to use the stock valve covers or not? dont mean to jack your thread, but i hadnt even thought about clearence with the rockers?!?!?! thanks
 

5spd GT

"the 5.0 owns all"
Founding Member
Aug 7, 2002
9,516
6
99
Arkansas
Nov 11, 2004
#13
  • Nov 11, 2004
  • #13
ninety15.0 said:
Im building a new 306 this winter. Im using P&P E7's with either 1.6 or 1.7 roler rockers. Am i going to be able to use the stock valve covers or not? dont mean to jack your thread, but i hadnt even thought about clearence with the rockers?!?!?! thanks
Click to expand...

I had 1.6 RR's on my 93 with the stock heads and valve covers and you can either trim the oil baffle or just remove it completely and it will have no problems...but obviously always check...spin the engine over with the valve cover sitting over the RR's (without the gasket) and see if it "moves" the cover...if not then your fine...because it will definatly clear when you add the gasket...
 

ninety15.0

New Member
Mar 10, 2004
1,336
0
0
Nov 11, 2004
#14
  • Nov 11, 2004
  • #14
cool thanks for the info...i'll be sure to check that before i start anything up.
 

5spd GT

"the 5.0 owns all"
Founding Member
Aug 7, 2002
9,516
6
99
Arkansas
Nov 11, 2004
#15
  • Nov 11, 2004
  • #15
ninety15.0 said:
cool thanks for the info...i'll be sure to check that before i start anything up.
Click to expand...

Just make sure you don't bolt the valve covers down when looking for the clearance...because if they didn't clear you could end up with broken valve covers...and just disconnect your coil on the distributor and spin the engine over...or you can do it by hand (15/16 socket on a break-over bar)...

Good Luck with it...I'm sure you'll be fine if the oil baffle is removed...or trimmed...
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

6
Hey all,I’m putting together a 302 for my 1968 Mustang and wanted to post the combo + some questions to make sure I’m not missing crucial
  • 68_Disgustang
  • Feb 22, 2026
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
4
Views
955
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Jun 20, 2026
gray owl
G
S
Engine Stalls when downshifting/coasting
  • Scott_S
  • Nov 5, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
11
Views
745
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Nov 6, 2025
Mustang5L5
Drivetrain 83’ Glx convertible C5 Trans help!
  • JacksonJared2113
  • Dec 25, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
2
Views
401
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Dec 26, 2025
JacksonJared2113
B
water pump installation questions
  • B0udreaux
  • Feb 5, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
38
Views
2K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Feb 28, 2026
General karthief
1
Engine Motor swap from a 2003 Explorer
  • 1996mustang new
  • Oct 9, 2025
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Replies
7
Views
616
SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech Oct 16, 2025
squeak93
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?