• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech

edelbrock h/c/i for 5.0 's ????

  • Thread starter Thread starter C_Heath
  • Start date Start date Sep 18, 2006
C

C_Heath

Member
Dec 31, 2004
35
0
6
Sep 18, 2006
#1
  • Sep 18, 2006
  • #1
so what their saying is that if I purchase this package for my bone stock 5.0 that I will acheive 367 horsepower power over the stock 225?

So Im picking up 142 horses with just the h/c/i/?

Thanks :SNSign:
 
R

R2D2

Sep 18, 2006
#2
  • Sep 18, 2006
  • #2
 
C

C_Heath

Member
Dec 31, 2004
35
0
6
Sep 18, 2006
#3
  • Sep 18, 2006
  • #3
Thats what I thought, they shouldt BS people.

Thats the way it reads too.
 
G

GT89Mustang

New Member
Mar 31, 2005
0
0
0
Monmouth County, NJ
Sep 18, 2006
#4
  • Sep 18, 2006
  • #4
Actually might not be total bs, most people with well matched h/c/i intake packages see somewhere around 300hp and the wheels, if you add in a 15% drivtrain loss its around 345 at the crank. So its not too far fetched, a little high maybe, dont forget most of the time thier talking about crank hp no rwhp.
 

90_Red_LX

Member
Sep 29, 2003
668
5
19
Asheboro, NC
Sep 18, 2006
#5
  • Sep 18, 2006
  • #5
GT89Mustang said:
Actually might not be total bs, most people with well matched h/c/i intake packages see somewhere around 300hp and the wheels, if you add in a 15% drivtrain loss its around 345 at the crank. So its not too far fetched, a little high maybe, dont forget most of the time thier talking about crank hp no rwhp.
Click to expand...

True. To achieve them good numbers that motor was probably tuned to within an inch of its life just long enough to "prove" it can make that kinda power.
 

DMAN302

My mom says thanks for the pearl necklace.
Nov 8, 2003
2,120
2
59
windsor, Canada
Sep 18, 2006
#6
  • Sep 18, 2006
  • #6
very attainable...intake close too but not quite as free as the RPM and my cam was a bit hotter but still managed near 370/397 flywheel.
http://i4.photobucket.com/albums/y127/dman302/latestdyno2.jpg
 

mustangramair

Member
Feb 24, 2004
326
0
17
Iowa
Sep 18, 2006
#7
  • Sep 18, 2006
  • #7
Trick Flow advertises 350 hp for their kit on a 306. So 367 isn't that much more.
 
M

mfewtrail

Member
Sep 3, 2003
82
0
6
North GA
Sep 19, 2006
#8
  • Sep 19, 2006
  • #8
It's attainable, but you'll probably need a tune in order to get there. 367hp @ the crank would equate to 312hp @ the wheels assuming 15% drivetrain loss. Search around on the board and you'll find several people that have made a bit over 300whp on simple h/c/i combos along w/ the normal supporting bolt-ons.
 

just4bob50

Active Member
Apr 2, 2005
504
5
28
Pa.
Sep 19, 2006
#9
  • Sep 19, 2006
  • #9
It is absolutelt possible. My friends stock 302 block with an eddy performer int.,performer heads, e-cam, 1.7 rockers, made 309 rwhp after it was tuned with the AFR at around 12.5:1. This was on the Dynojet a Kaufmanns Motor sports. Just remember those kits are rated at fly wheel horsepower, and only have the neccesary accessories to run it on the motor. If you take 309 and add 15 percent for drive loss thats like 355 on the crank.
 

bubba-dough

Active Member
Dec 28, 2004
1,044
2
38
Indiana
Sep 19, 2006
#10
  • Sep 19, 2006
  • #10
I agree with the "tuned to an inch of its life" comment made ealier. Also with what kind of compression is that 367 based on?

Btw, imo, throw the "15%" drivetrain loss myth out the door....so I am making 500 rwhp and I am losing 75 hp through my drivetrain??? Yeah ok.
 

just4bob50

Active Member
Apr 2, 2005
504
5
28
Pa.
Sep 19, 2006
#11
  • Sep 19, 2006
  • #11
bubba-dough said:
I agree with the "tuned to an inch of its life" comment made ealier. Also with what kind of compression is that 367 based on?

Btw, imo, throw the "15%" drivetrain loss myth out the door....so I am making 500 rwhp and I am losing 75 hp through my drivetrain??? Yeah ok.
Click to expand...

Its no myth about drive loss. Plus if you making 500 rwhp you should know that buy now.
 

bubba-dough

Active Member
Dec 28, 2004
1,044
2
38
Indiana
Sep 19, 2006
#12
  • Sep 19, 2006
  • #12
True there is drivetrain loss, I am not arguing that, however its not a consistant 15 percent....if that were the case guys making say 3000 hp are losing 450 horse......I am just saying there is no way in hell I am losing 75 horse....no way...
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

X
Engine Brackets for Gt40 heads with ac and ps?
  • Xavierg208
  • Nov 14, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
9
Views
390
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Nov 16, 2025
limp
9
Engine Donor '00 Mountaineer meet '91 Fox
  • 91firecracker
  • May 11, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2 3
Replies
41
Views
893
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech May 28, 2026
91firecracker
9
J
New to Mustangs/Fords
  • Joradan93Foxbody
  • Mar 2, 2026
  • The Welcome Wagon
Replies
0
Views
138
The Welcome Wagon Mar 2, 2026
Joradan93Foxbody
J
X
Engine 5.0 Head Gaskets installed wrong block coolant passages???
  • Xam Sirrah
  • Jul 21, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
12
Views
683
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Dec 22, 2025
Qtrhrse23
Q
R
Engine Evap and charcoal cannister leak
  • ryan1994stang
  • Mar 14, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
8
Views
427
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Mar 18, 2026
Mcmahst
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?