• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech

Edelbrock Perfromer RPM heads/ About how much will I gain?

  • Thread starter Thread starter CobraWannabe
  • Start date Start date Jan 29, 2004

CobraWannabe

Member
Jul 16, 2003
321
0
17
Lancaster, PA
Jan 29, 2004
#1
  • Jan 29, 2004
  • #1
I have a stock 93 Cobra motor and was wondering how much I could gain from a set of heads (I like the Performer RPM's). I will have a cam before the heads, so you can take that into account also. I thought it would be like 50hp, but I just read an article in one of the Stang mags and they only gained like 35hp. Is this what I should expect?
 
H

Highbredcloud

Active Member
Mar 4, 2003
1,075
1
36
Palos Hills, IL
Jan 29, 2004
#2
  • Jan 29, 2004
  • #2
if you got the money for the pefromer RPM's...save a bit more and get AFR's 165 and you'll get more HP than you would with the RPM's...
 

mike keirstead

New Member
Aug 6, 2003
1,121
0
0
ROLLING A JOINT
Jan 29, 2004
#3
  • Jan 29, 2004
  • #3
Highbredcloud said:
if you got the money for the pefromer RPM's...save a bit more and get AFR's 165 and you'll get more HP than you would with the RPM's...
Click to expand...


I agree. The AFRs are a little more expensive but they will show more peak/average hp and torque. The average power is the most important. You spend most of your time going from 4000-6000 than you do at 6000. The AFR will make more power.
 

CobraWannabe

Member
Jul 16, 2003
321
0
17
Lancaster, PA
Jan 29, 2004
#4
  • Jan 29, 2004
  • #4
Any idea how much I could gain? With just heads?
 
H

Highbredcloud

Active Member
Mar 4, 2003
1,075
1
36
Palos Hills, IL
Jan 29, 2004
#5
  • Jan 29, 2004
  • #5
with a set of AFR heads it would be wise to get a cam to take adventage of their flow...There was a guy around here that just put the AFR 165's on and kept stock everything...I think he had an intake but had a stock cam, TB, MAF and he went from around 230RWHP to 260 or 270RWHP...not too shabby if you ask me.
 
8

89tang

Founding Member
Oct 20, 2000
2,508
0
0
Newark ohio
Jan 29, 2004
#6
  • Jan 29, 2004
  • #6
AFR's are great, but if you can get a deal on some edelbrocks then go for it. The HP difference between the two from what i've heard is pretty unnoticable for your average street car. There was alot of discussion over on the corral about this and from what i read ppl. with edelbrocks where running damn near the same times as the ppl. with AFR's.

I picked up some RPM's myself but i also got the heads for 600 bucks shipped to my door figure i'll polish the ports alittle maybe make the exhaust ports bigger an it'll be good to go.
 

88GTStreetRod

Member
Jan 5, 2004
376
1
18
USA
Jan 29, 2004
#7
  • Jan 29, 2004
  • #7
I just added the Edlebrock Performer RPM's to my car. I think they are more durable for street use then the AFR and about the same performance for less money. I also added the Edelbrock Performer RPM II Intake and Plenum. I made a 90hp gain. I have the 303 cam along with a host of other modifications. Hope this helps!

CobraWannabe said:
I have a stock 93 Cobra motor and was wondering how much I could gain from a set of heads (I like the Performer RPM's). I will have a cam before the heads, so you can take that into account also. I thought it would be like 50hp, but I just read an article in one of the Stang mags and they only gained like 35hp. Is this what I should expect?
Click to expand...
 
S

stangin it

Founding Member
Sep 25, 2002
554
0
0
Long Island, NY
Jan 29, 2004
#8
  • Jan 29, 2004
  • #8
I went from 243rwhp/296ftlbs with these mods(1.7rr, pulleys, headers, exhaust, cobra intake manifold, C&L Maf, stock TB, stock heads, stock cam. Then when i added my performer heads i dynoed at 287rwhp/ 310ftlbs on the same dyno. The #'s are all STD corrected. Theres about a 10hp difference between AFR's and Edelbrocks. Im waiting to dyno with my cam in, il have #'s in the spring. Also i didnt have a real tune i just adjusted the fuel pressure a little but i definately could have pulled some more torque out of it.
 
8

89tang

Founding Member
Oct 20, 2000
2,508
0
0
Newark ohio
Jan 29, 2004
#9
  • Jan 29, 2004
  • #9
Also just to add, from the MM&FF head shootout they had. The RPM heads with the 2.02 intake valves flowed more then the 165s did. But if your talking about getting the RPM's with 1.90 valves then it'll be about the same, the RPMs with the 1.90 intake valves are exactly like the performer heads only they are non-emmison's legal.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

K
Resolved Need some assistance. Holley Terminator X alongside H/C/I. Very rough/inconsistent idle
  • karhoot
  • Jun 6, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
0
Views
101
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Jun 6, 2026
karhoot
K
Engine Heads and how to buy
  • Dontknowchit
  • Aug 16, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2
Replies
28
Views
2K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Aug 24, 2025
Noobz347
Ford truck engine swap issues
  • keel
  • Jul 7, 2026
  • Other Auto Tech
Replies
17
Views
325
Other Auto Tech Jul 13, 2026
General karthief
S
Engine Stalls when downshifting/coasting
  • Scott_S
  • Nov 5, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
11
Views
745
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Nov 6, 2025
Mustang5L5
6
Hey all,I’m putting together a 302 for my 1968 Mustang and wanted to post the combo + some questions to make sure I’m not missing crucial
  • 68_Disgustang
  • Feb 22, 2026
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
4
Views
955
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Jun 20, 2026
gray owl
G
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?