• Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech

EFI: Super Victor and throttle body

  • Thread starter Thread starter gonzothegreat
  • Start date Start date Mar 5, 2006
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last

gonzothegreat

Member
May 4, 2004
421
1
16
London (uk)
Mar 5, 2006
#1
  • Mar 5, 2006
  • #1
EFI:Edelbrock intake and throttle body

Hi guys,

I have decided to go EFI, using MegaSquirt.
My choice of intake is an Edelbrock Super Victor modified for EFI, or a Victor jnr.

I need some help on the throttle body.
I was lookin on ebay for some, and I have the choice between that style:

4 barrel throttle body
or
adapt something like that style:


What would be the best to use, aslo looking into spending the less as it will be a "DIY" job (not cutting corner, just going down the route of saving $$$)


your help is much appreciated.
Thanks
Stephane
 

Bullitt

Packin' Heat
Founding Member
Jan 13, 2000
2,743
0
47
Houston, TX
Mar 5, 2006
#2
  • Mar 5, 2006
  • #2
depends on how you want to do your air filter. classic round or "modern". you can buy an elbow from CHP that lets you run a 5.0 throttle body in a position similar to that 4.6 TB you have shown.

for my car i'd originally decided to run a megasquirt, actually built the computer, made a harness, installed it all in the car and had issues with the computer.

now i'm putting a 5.0 mass air system on the car. a much better solution in my opinion.

just some advice from someone who's been down that road.
 

gonzothegreat

Member
May 4, 2004
421
1
16
London (uk)
Mar 5, 2006
#3
  • Mar 5, 2006
  • #3
do you have any pictures of your system?

I forgot to ask, do you think I could modify my Performer RPM intake, or do I need to change it?
 
S

steel1212

Active Member
Jun 24, 2004
1,180
0
36
Frankfort, Ky
Mar 5, 2006
#4
  • Mar 5, 2006
  • #4
I personally would go with the top one. That would just be from a looks stand point. If I could go efi and still look like a carb with out anybody knowing I would consider that.
 

gonzothegreat

Member
May 4, 2004
421
1
16
London (uk)
Mar 5, 2006
#5
  • Mar 5, 2006
  • #5
I am considering installing the fuel injector on the sides on the intake, I believe it's called a spider style (not sure about the name)
 

Bullitt

Packin' Heat
Founding Member
Jan 13, 2000
2,743
0
47
Houston, TX
Mar 5, 2006
#6
  • Mar 5, 2006
  • #6
gonzothegreat said:
do you have any pictures of your system?
Click to expand...

in progress... pictures later. i do have pictures of the car with a 4 barrel accel setup like you are considering.

you "can" modify a performer RPM, but it won't work well. you really need a single plane manifold for individual runner fuel injection. if you did a throttle body injection system you could stay with the performer RPM.
 
5

5.0ina66

Member
Jun 6, 2003
664
0
16
Ohio
Mar 5, 2006
#7
  • Mar 5, 2006
  • #7
The Wieand Excellerator or Edelbrock TorkerII both work really well in SBF Megasquirt apps. Would you be putting the injectors in the runners or using a 4bbl throttle body? Either way I'd run a 4bbl throttle body for looks (works well too!), in either a port injected or TBI setup.
 
J

jbuening

Member
Apr 28, 2005
399
0
17
Mar 8, 2006
#8
  • Mar 8, 2006
  • #8
I've been looking at these for quite some time. They also sell the elbow to hook up the normal throttle bodies but i'd go with the accel like in your first picture. Hood clearance should be watched though, cause this intake looks like the Vic Jr which is high rise. Not sure on the height of the throttle body though. My mach is my daily driver so converting to EFI just isn't in the picture right now
 

gonzothegreat

Member
May 4, 2004
421
1
16
London (uk)
Mar 8, 2006
#9
  • Mar 8, 2006
  • #9
thanks for the eBay link, I think I am going to adapt my RPM performer for the DIY job trying to save cash on the EFI conversion
 

Bullitt

Packin' Heat
Founding Member
Jan 13, 2000
2,743
0
47
Houston, TX
Mar 9, 2006
#10
  • Mar 9, 2006
  • #10
unless you have access to a machine shop i'd recommend against it.

how are you going to cut the injector pockets? you can buy bungs to epoxy in, or you can buy a tool from Kinsler to cut the pockets (tool is like $200). then you have to do a fuel rail unless you individually plumb each injector and then you still have to make a fuel rail to plumb those 8 lines into 1 or 2 feed lines (you'll go broke on fittings).

and on top of that you're still injecting a dual-plane manifold which really won't work all that well (tuning nightmare).

if you want to keep the performer, your best bet is going to be throttle body injection.
 

rhyno9

Founding Member
Oct 30, 2002
209
0
0
Oswego Illinnoying
Mar 9, 2006
#11
  • Mar 9, 2006
  • #11
jbuening said:
I've been looking at these for quite some time.
Click to expand...


One of the problems with them is the fuel rails are unavailable at this time. At least that is what I had found with regard to a 351w.
 

gonzothegreat

Member
May 4, 2004
421
1
16
London (uk)
Mar 10, 2006
#12
  • Mar 10, 2006
  • #12
Bullitt said:
unless you have access to a machine shop i'd recommend against it.

how are you going to cut the injector pockets? you can buy bungs to epoxy in, or you can buy a tool from Kinsler to cut the pockets (tool is like $200). then you have to do a fuel rail unless you individually plumb each injector and then you still have to make a fuel rail to plumb those 8 lines into 1 or 2 feed lines (you'll go broke on fittings).

and on top of that you're still injecting a dual-plane manifold which really won't work all that well (tuning nightmare).

if you want to keep the performer, your best bet is going to be throttle body injection.
Click to expand...


I have access to a good machine shop.
As for the dual plane, I was thinking of removing the separation wall inside
 

Is1BadFord

New Member
Mar 9, 2006
11
0
0
Mar 11, 2006
#13
  • Mar 11, 2006
  • #13
The separation wall isn't really the issue I'm thinking. With a single plane intake, you have a large open plenum that all the SIMILAR sized/shaped runners draw from. The key there is that tuning for each runner is similar. No odd twists and bends from one bank to the other. With a dual plane, airflow to each bank is different. Not necessarily a different amount, but I'm betting money that you have all kinds of different velocities going on in there. Any reasonably priced ECU doesn't tune from port to port, they tune bank to bank and rely on little or no variance in port flow and velocity from side to side to average injector pulses etc. I can't see a dual plane intake really working there.

You can buy a nice Victor Jr. styled single plane off Ebay for in the 150$ range if you really want to drill it yourself. These intakes are very uniform at the port area, and some already have a pad where injectors can be drilled (often this is for nitrous, but it's nice for us EFI guys). Your dual plane is going to make drilling and installing injectors a real pain, not to mention the tuning headaches later. Plus, a Performer RPM isn't the best flowing intake going right now. Even an air gap offers substantial increases in that dpt, along with other benefits.

My advice? Go with the predrilled Victor Jr. Injector bungs are about 60$ for eight, then the cost of having them epoxied/welded (I wouldn't use epoxy btw) makes the 299$ price tag worth it. The fuel rail isn't that difficult to make, and even if you couldn't make them the rails from many other companies will fit as port spacing is port spacing on a SBF. You're saving yourself mass headaches, and not really spending much more money than you would have any other way.

Oh, as for a Super Victor...the Victor Jr's are making upwards of 600hp on quite a few SBF's I've read about, even more on occasion (go to www.massfloefi.com, they're making over 800hp from what I understand). You'd need one wild as all hell combo to need a Super Victor =).

Hope this helps!
 
5

5.0ina66

Member
Jun 6, 2003
664
0
16
Ohio
Mar 11, 2006
#14
  • Mar 11, 2006
  • #14
Is1BadFord said:
The separation wall isn't really the issue I'm thinking. With a single plane intake, you have a large open plenum that all the SIMILAR sized/shaped runners draw from. The key there is that tuning for each runner is similar. No odd twists and bends from one bank to the other. With a dual plane, airflow to each bank is different. Not necessarily a different amount, but I'm betting money that you have all kinds of different velocities going on in there. Any reasonably priced ECU doesn't tune from port to port, they tune bank to bank and rely on little or no variance in port flow and velocity from side to side to average injector pulses etc. I can't see a dual plane intake really working there. !
Click to expand...
Agreed! :SNSign: BUT...good luck fitting one under the hood...I vote for an xcellerator or a TorkerII, they're a lot shorter single planes and work well with megasquirt.
 

Is1BadFord

New Member
Mar 9, 2006
11
0
0
Mar 11, 2006
#15
  • Mar 11, 2006
  • #15
Yeppers!

Mine will use the Victor Jr style...I was even considering a Parker style lol. But for most people who are looking at hood clearance as an issue, either of the above intakes would work great.

My motor's also going to be in the 500+hp range...sooo =)
 
J

jbuening

Member
Apr 28, 2005
399
0
17
Mar 11, 2006
#16
  • Mar 11, 2006
  • #16
A few more EFI reference sites for throttle bodies

http://www.fuelairspark.com/Products/Information/throttleBodiesLSX.asp

http://www.auto-nomics.com/cgi-bin/showresults?q=everything
 

gonzothegreat

Member
May 4, 2004
421
1
16
London (uk)
Mar 12, 2006
#17
  • Mar 12, 2006
  • #17
Is1BadFord said:
The separation wall isn't really the issue I'm thinking. With a single plane intake, you have a large open plenum that all the SIMILAR sized/shaped runners draw from. The key there is that tuning for each runner is similar. No odd twists and bends from one bank to the other. With a dual plane, airflow to each bank is different. Not necessarily a different amount, but I'm betting money that you have all kinds of different velocities going on in there. Any reasonably priced ECU doesn't tune from port to port, they tune bank to bank and rely on little or no variance in port flow and velocity from side to side to average injector pulses etc. I can't see a dual plane intake really working there.

You can buy a nice Victor Jr. styled single plane off Ebay for in the 150$ range if you really want to drill it yourself. These intakes are very uniform at the port area, and some already have a pad where injectors can be drilled (often this is for nitrous, but it's nice for us EFI guys). Your dual plane is going to make drilling and installing injectors a real pain, not to mention the tuning headaches later. Plus, a Performer RPM isn't the best flowing intake going right now. Even an air gap offers substantial increases in that dpt, along with other benefits.

My advice? Go with the predrilled Victor Jr. Injector bungs are about 60$ for eight, then the cost of having them epoxied/welded (I wouldn't use epoxy btw) makes the 299$ price tag worth it. The fuel rail isn't that difficult to make, and even if you couldn't make them the rails from many other companies will fit as port spacing is port spacing on a SBF. You're saving yourself mass headaches, and not really spending much more money than you would have any other way.

Oh, as for a Super Victor...the Victor Jr's are making upwards of 600hp on quite a few SBF's I've read about, even more on occasion (go to www.massfloefi.com, they're making over 800hp from what I understand). You'd need one wild as all hell combo to need a Super Victor =).

Hope this helps!
Click to expand...


it does help, thanks buddy
 

gonzothegreat

Member
May 4, 2004
421
1
16
London (uk)
Mar 12, 2006
#18
  • Mar 12, 2006
  • #18
jbuening said:
A few more EFI reference sites for throttle bodies

http://www.fuelairspark.com/Products/Information/throttleBodiesLSX.asp
Click to expand...


price tag $1000
 
F

ForceFed70

That's why they call it "dope"
Founding Member
Dec 6, 1999
4,818
1
69
BC Canada
Mar 12, 2006
#19
  • Mar 12, 2006
  • #19
Bullitt said:
for my car i'd originally decided to run a megasquirt, actually built the computer, made a harness, installed it all in the car and had issues with the computer.

now i'm putting a 5.0 mass air system on the car. a much better solution in my opinion.

just some advice from someone who's been down that road.
Click to expand...

I'm sorry to hear that the megasquirt wasn't working for you.

So far I've been having great luck with my megasquirt EFI conversion. The '70 already starts and idles alot better than it did with the old holley double-pumper. That's not to say I didn't have some problems... a worn out ignition switch really had me chasing my tail for a while there...

If you or anyone else ever needs some help with a megasquirt install, I'd be glad to help.
Here's a link to my Megasquirt writeup: http://forums.stangnet.com/showthread.php?t=593406
 

Is1BadFord

New Member
Mar 9, 2006
11
0
0
Mar 12, 2006
#20
  • Mar 12, 2006
  • #20
gonzothegreat said:
price tag $1000
Click to expand...

http://www.ptrsds.com/manifolds .htm

Here's one for 465$, not sure if it comes with Throttle sensor and IAC or not. Scroll down to the bottom btw.

After reading your main post, I looked into MegaSquirt quite a bit more last night. All I knew was it was speed density, which was something I didn't want. After reading BottleFed70's write up, and reading around some more, I decided to price it out. Even having the ECU and other electronics prebuilt, it knocked 1000$ off my budget for the fuel injection conversion. This puts it at just over 2000$, but that includes the fuel system from tank to fuel rails, as well as all spark control. I'm actually going to look into the EDIS system today, and see if it isn't less expensive than a distributor/coil setup =). I know it can make good power!

I'm still a little concerned with speed density + my .620"+ and 292dgr solid roller cam on a 331ci motor, but I think once I get it situated, I'll be able to tune it out, or someone might be able to help me tune it out anyhow =p.

Good luck with your project, let us know how it goes =)
 
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

351W/5.8 EFI intake manifolds fading away...
  • Ryno5150
  • Jan 13, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
7
Views
516
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Feb 7, 2026
nickyb
351w turbo build.... Turbo guys teach me things...
  • Kid wita 5oh
  • Oct 22, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
13
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Oct 23, 2025
General karthief
M
WTB/Trade 86 GT throttle body
  • Magnet86
  • Mar 27, 2025
  • Engine and Power Adder
Replies
0
Views
173
Engine and Power Adder Mar 27, 2025
Magnet86
M
6
Hey all,I’m putting together a 302 for my 1968 Mustang and wanted to post the combo + some questions to make sure I’m not missing crucial
  • 68_Disgustang
  • Feb 22, 2026
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
4
Views
821
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Jun 20, 2026
gray owl
G
A
Carb swap question
  • AA wALtZ
  • Jul 27, 2024
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
18
Views
2K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Aug 8, 2024
General karthief
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?