• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech

EGR Delete Plate

  • Thread starter Thread starter fox_body
  • Start date Start date Apr 30, 2009
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
First Prev 2 of 2

capri debris

Member
May 5, 2007
289
6
18
PA
May 6, 2009
#21
  • May 6, 2009
  • #21
West Texas Z said:
quick question, what good would it do to delete the coolant hoses and EGR?

(noob here)
Click to expand...

Deleting the EGR is common when removing all the smog crap (pump, check valves & hoses, solenoids, vacuum lines, pipe in back of the heads, etc.) Deleting the small water lines is just to clean up the engine bay and remove the chance of a water leak if the TB gasket ever fails. Some say the water supply to the spacer is to help cool it down in the summer and some say it's to keep the TB from icing up in the winter... I think it's for both. But I don't have them hooked up in my car because it's never driven in the winter and the cooling effect can't be too great because the temp of the coolant is about 190*.

And here is a good close up pic like I promised.
 
W

West Texas Z

Member
Apr 2, 2009
71
0
6
Thornton, Colorado
May 6, 2009
#22
  • May 6, 2009
  • #22
hmm, I see. makes sense. Would it be a smart idea if I DO drive it in the winter?
 

nunly94gt

Founding Member
Feb 3, 2002
1,595
3
38
Mobile, Al
May 7, 2009
#23
  • May 7, 2009
  • #23
You live in TX, I dont think you will have a problem.

They are for the icing problem though. There shouldnt be a problem unless you drive in extreme conditions with it, which most of us Fox owners dont do anyways.
 
J

j-wigg

New Member
Oct 5, 2008
32
0
0
May 7, 2009
#24
  • May 7, 2009
  • #24
what did he/you do for the bracket for the tb cable that is mounted on the egr block? is there a piece there for a tap or bolt to go through?
 
J

j-wigg

New Member
Oct 5, 2008
32
0
0
May 7, 2009
#25
  • May 7, 2009
  • #25
nevermind, i just scrolled back up and looked at the other pic. is that threaded or for a bolt???
 
F

fox_body

New Member
Nov 14, 2005
32
0
0
Watertown, Wis
May 7, 2009
#26
  • May 7, 2009
  • #26
Put me down for 1 for sure. Pm me for details.. Paypal work?
 
T

TheFox

New Member
Mar 16, 2009
57
0
0
May 7, 2009
#27
  • May 7, 2009
  • #27
Sing me up boss getting all my info and goods on an engine build up
 
J

j-wigg

New Member
Oct 5, 2008
32
0
0
May 8, 2009
#28
  • May 8, 2009
  • #28
i think you buddy just made some quick $$$$
 
F

fox_body

New Member
Nov 14, 2005
32
0
0
Watertown, Wis
May 16, 2009
#29
  • May 16, 2009
  • #29
any word if this is a done deal...?
 
S

stangbang302

New Member
Jul 13, 2007
180
0
0
fort valley, ga
May 17, 2009
#30
  • May 17, 2009
  • #30
all i did was blocked off the back of the egr, looks cheap tho. i would love to have one of those deletes tho.
 

capri debris

Member
May 5, 2007
289
6
18
PA
May 17, 2009
#31
  • May 17, 2009
  • #31
fox_body said:
any word if this is a done deal...?
Click to expand...

Still working on it, but getting close. I'll let everyone know when they can place an order. The only info you need to give is what bore size you want.
 
S

svtmustang

New Member
May 19, 2009
1
0
0
May 19, 2009
#32
  • May 19, 2009
  • #32
I just encountered a similiar problem several weeks ago. It all started because I upgraded throttle bodies and found the BBK Throttle Body spacer created a horrible whistle. BBK blamed the throttle body and Accufab blamed BBK. In the end I bought a 3/8 Steeda EGR delete plate, but encountered the throttle cable hitting the fuel pressure regulator and the coolant pipes. I was hoping for the smaller spacer because my Anderson power pipe rubs on the shock tower. In the end, I purchased one of these on Ebay.

http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&ssPageName=STRK:MESELX:IT&item=230343997872

It helped provide the clearance for the power pipe while making the throttle linkage correct. It also got rid of the annoying whistle- (Sorry BBK- but it was your product). What I liked is that it includes all the bolts and gaskets- so it was a quick deal. I also used the trick resistor thing he has and it saved me some money.

I think you will be able to get them soon from

CUSTOM BILLET WORKS


I hope this helps for anyone who wants to get their ride back up going after being disappointed by the smaller spacer.
 

Mustang5L5

That is…until I whipped out my Bissell
Mod Dude
Feb 18, 2001
43,216
17,899
224
Massachusetts
May 20, 2009
#33
  • May 20, 2009
  • #33
fox_body said:
To take care of my Check Engine Light I have been running one of these lil' guys for 3yrs now I have had not 1 problem!!

http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/EGR-...ptZMotorsQ5fCarQ5fTruckQ5fPartsQ5fAccessories

As far as the EGR spacer refab I"ll pu the word out!
Click to expand...

By telling your car your EGR is working, it pulls fuel and timing out at part throttle expecting inert EGR gases to be present. Since the EGR is not functional however, combustible air will be present in it's place and you will run lean at part throttle cruising.

This device prevents the engine from re-burning exhaust gases. Hence, the engine is always burning fresh fuel and air, thus making more power. It really doesn't have any adverse effects on the motor, it actually helps by not allowing burned exhaust gasses back into the motor.
Click to expand...

The Ebay page has it wrong. At idle and WOT, the EGR is non-operative, so you will make the same HP with an EGR than you would without an EGR. Allowing burned gases into the motor at crusing speed is basically the same as modern cylinder deactivation. By pumping inert gas in, you reduce the combustion chamber size requiring less fuel to burn at cruising rpm. Honestly, there is very little benefit to removing the EGR other than cleaning up the bay which i can understand. And for those worried about hot EGR gases....have you felt your engine after driving around for a couple hours?? Deleting the EGR to reduce heat is not going to make a difference.

If you want to ditch your EGR, block the ports off at the cylinder heads and get a tune or chip to remove the function...otherwise you are better off leaving the CEL light on so that the computer can avoid activating the system on it's own and you won't go lean.

If you car is a weekend car or fun toy then by all means go ahead and delete it. But if it's your daily driver, then you might want to reconsider removing it. If anything you might want t omake sure it's working correctly and efficiently.
 
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
First Prev 2 of 2
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

S
Fuel ‘88 GT Runs Rich Cold — Fixes Itself When I Unplug Sensors (ECT, MAF, O2, etc.)
  • Sufarry
  • Nov 6, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
12
Views
756
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Nov 9, 2025
Mustang5L5
M
Engine Unexplainable Exhaust Pop and Gurgle
  • Mrnissen122
  • Feb 14, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
12
Views
509
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Feb 18, 2026
Noobz347
Engine Sick of stock TB and EGR spacer...
  • 91GTstroked
  • Dec 15, 2024
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
6
Views
654
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Dec 19, 2024
General karthief
Engine Popping noise in the intake. Frustrated still.
  • esteban31065
  • Apr 6, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
15
Views
1K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech May 23, 2025
gkomo
0
V6 to V8 Swap info
  • 02_2v_Curtis
  • Jan 11, 2026
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
0
Views
641
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- Jan 11, 2026
02_2v_Curtis
0
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?