• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech

EGR elimination ?'s

  • Thread starter Thread starter shootshescores
  • Start date Start date May 21, 2008
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last

shootshescores

New Member
May 1, 2005
65
1
0
May 21, 2008
#1
  • May 21, 2008
  • #1
For all of you who have removed your EGR's and/or went to a blank, could you provide some details on the process as well as some input on your engine's behavior after removal?
Just looking for some details.
Going to be purchasing a 70mm TB soon and was just wondering if I should keep the EGR system or remove it if its worth the trouble.
 

Fett

New Member
Nov 2, 2004
766
6
0
May 21, 2008
#2
  • May 21, 2008
  • #2
Leave it on, unless you have a specific reason for removing it.

There are no gains to be had, performance or otherwise by removing the EGR. I have mine removed, but that is only because both the sensor and valve went bad, and I already had a Tweecer...so it was much easier and cheaper to remove it. But I wouldn't go out of my way to remove it for no reason....especially if you don't have the means to bypass it's function in the PCM.
 

Foxfan88

My Grandpa has great wood.
Sep 13, 2004
2,487
4
0
Miami, Ok
May 21, 2008
#3
  • May 21, 2008
  • #3
what he said.


dont take it off unless you can truly disable it in the EEC
 

joel5.0

Member
Jun 15, 2004
429
2
18
Puerto Rico
May 21, 2008
#4
  • May 21, 2008
  • #4
The EGR function is automatically bypassed/deleted as soon as an EGR related failure code is logged in the EEC....
 

Fett

New Member
Nov 2, 2004
766
6
0
May 21, 2008
#5
  • May 21, 2008
  • #5
Yes, but I want to say that an EGR failure code alters fuel trim at cruising RPMs. So it's not just a matter of the PCM turning off the function when the failure code is tripped, and nothing else is effected.
 

joel5.0

Member
Jun 15, 2004
429
2
18
Puerto Rico
May 21, 2008
#6
  • May 21, 2008
  • #6
Fett said:
Yes, but I want to say that an EGR failure code alters fuel trim at cruising RPMs. So it's not just a matter of the PCM turning off the function when the failure code is tripped, and nothing else is effected.
Click to expand...
No it doesn't, as explained in the GUFB strategy extract below, the FMEM table shown per sensor circuit failure, and many test cases I've worked over the years that had the EGR disabled (EGR failure codes logged), w/out the owner knowing about it.



 

Fett

New Member
Nov 2, 2004
766
6
0
May 21, 2008
#7
  • May 21, 2008
  • #7
I always thought that was true of EEC-V PCMs, because EEC-IV PCMs weren't able to alter fuel trims based on failing components.

You learn something new everyday.
 

shootshescores

New Member
May 1, 2005
65
1
0
May 22, 2008
#8
  • May 22, 2008
  • #8
joel5.0 said:
The EGR function is automatically bypassed/deleted as soon as an EGR related failure code is logged in the EEC....
Click to expand...

So the code 31 that I pulled is disabling my entire EGR function?

Refer to my other Thread: http://forums.stangnet.com/showthread.php?p=7497625#post7497625
 

joel5.0

Member
Jun 15, 2004
429
2
18
Puerto Rico
May 22, 2008
#9
  • May 22, 2008
  • #9
shootshescores said:
So the code 31 that I pulled is disabling my entire EGR function?

Refer to my other Thread: http://forums.stangnet.com/showthread.php?p=7497625#post7497625
Click to expand...

Yep..... 31 = EVP voltage is below its 0.24 vdc minimum closed position threshold value, and will cause the EGR function to be deleted until the failure is fixed.
 

shootshescores

New Member
May 1, 2005
65
1
0
May 23, 2008
#10
  • May 23, 2008
  • #10
If I can't fix the problem then its bye-bye EGR.
It seems like a pretty simple task to remove the EGR. I can just take the car to Alternative Auto and have them delete things in the computer. Are there any surprises I may need to know about?
 

joel5.0

Member
Jun 15, 2004
429
2
18
Puerto Rico
May 23, 2008
#11
  • May 23, 2008
  • #11
shootshescores said:
If I can't fix the problem then its bye-bye EGR.
It seems like a pretty simple task to remove the EGR. I can just take the car to Alternative Auto and have them delete things in the computer. Are there any surprises I may need to know about?
Click to expand...

You were given good information regarding how to check the EVP signal through its range, suggest to verify for 5vdc VREF, the integrity of the SIGRTN ground reference for the sensor, and the mechanical aspect of the valve........ if these check OK, you only need to replace the EVP sensor, which BTW is the most common cause for that type of failure code. LUK
 

2000xp8

SN Certified Technician
Aug 8, 2003
8,016
1,613
194
NJ
May 23, 2008
#12
  • May 23, 2008
  • #12
I used an egr simulator, don't really know if it ever did anything productive for me, but it was $20 and plugged in, and i had no codes, so....

U can get them on ebay.
 

shootshescores

New Member
May 1, 2005
65
1
0
Jul 15, 2008
#13
  • Jul 15, 2008
  • #13
I plan on checking out the EVP today to see if I should order my throttle body with an EGR blank or with the EGR plate. If the EVP's bad I plan on eliminating the EGR system.

Does anyone have any tech articles that describe the EGR system removal steps in depth?
 

shootshescores

New Member
May 1, 2005
65
1
0
Jul 15, 2008
#14
  • Jul 15, 2008
  • #14
shootshescores said:
I plan on checking out the EVP today to see if I should order my throttle body with an EGR blank or with the EGR plate. If the EVP's bad I plan on eliminating the EGR system.

Does anyone have any tech articles that describe the EGR system removal steps in depth?
Click to expand...

Well, I had zero volts when I tested the EVP sensor before and after depressing the plunger.

I think my best bet is to eliminate the system with a new throttle body with EGR blank vs. replacing the broken parts. I haven't replaced my stock TB yet so why not. What do you guys think?
 

Mustang5L5

That is…until I whipped out my Bissell
Mod Dude
Feb 18, 2001
43,229
17,912
224
Massachusetts
Jul 15, 2008
#15
  • Jul 15, 2008
  • #15
2000xp8 said:
I used an egr simulator, don't really know if it ever did anything productive for me, but it was $20 and plugged in, and i had no codes, so....

U can get them on ebay.
Click to expand...


That may be leaning you out at part throttle.

It's telling the computer the EGR is working and dumping inert gas into the chamber so the computer pulls fuel out. However...that inert gas is replaced by combustible gas and now you are running lean.



BTW, the purpose of the EGR is to improve emmissions and fuel economy as well by reducing the amount of fuel used during cruising.
 

joel5.0

Member
Jun 15, 2004
429
2
18
Puerto Rico
Jul 15, 2008
#16
  • Jul 15, 2008
  • #16
Mustang5L5 said:
That may be leaning you out at part throttle.

It's telling the computer the EGR is working and dumping inert gas into the chamber so the computer pulls fuel out. However...that inert gas is replaced by combustible gas and now you are running lean.



BTW, the purpose of the EGR is to improve emmissions and fuel economy as well by reducing the amount of fuel used during cruising.
Click to expand...
Nope.... as soon as a code 33, or any EGR related code is registered, the EGR function is disabled, deleted, bypassed.

BTW.... if the inert gases were replaced by combustible gases, the O2 sensors will detect that condition and cause the EEC to perform a fuel trim correction.... close loop operation is not affected by the EGR being snafu'ed or with failure codes, as explained in the GUFB strategy.....

 

Mustang5L5

That is…until I whipped out my Bissell
Mod Dude
Feb 18, 2001
43,229
17,912
224
Massachusetts
Jul 15, 2008
#17
  • Jul 15, 2008
  • #17
joel5.0 said:
Nope.... as soon as a code 33, or any EGR related code is registered, the EGR function is disabled, deleted, bypassed.
Click to expand...


But i beleive the function of those resistor circuits it to trick the EEC into thinking the EGR works and therefore not trip the code 33 at all?

Not sure if that's true. I've never looked into what those EGR electronic resistor bypasses did
 

joel5.0

Member
Jun 15, 2004
429
2
18
Puerto Rico
Jul 15, 2008
#18
  • Jul 15, 2008
  • #18
Mustang5L5 said:
But i beleive the function of those resistor circuits it to trick the EEC into thinking the EGR works and therefore not trip the code 33 at all?

Not sure if that's true. I've never looked into what those EGR electronic resistor bypasses did
Click to expand...

They cause the EVP signal to be set between .24 vdc and .67 vdc (= closed EGR valve "pass" window, or prevent a code 31 or 34)..... since there is no EGR valve actuation to cause the EVP signal to increase when the EEC cycles the EVR solenoid to open the valve..... the EEC detects the valve as "not opening" when commanded to....... a code 33 is logged, the EGR function is automatically deleted/bypassed and the CEL is not triggered.
 

1990Coupe

Founding Member
Mar 11, 2002
1,462
132
114
Toms River NJ
Jul 16, 2008
#19
  • Jul 16, 2008
  • #19
OK so here is my question (sorry OP)..

I am about to perform a 5.oh swap in my 91 hatch. Should i even bother with all the sensors (as in hooking up all the vac lines, EGR sensor, and the small sensors on the passenger side rear shock tower)??????

I am going to run a high flow X pipe WITH cats, and run the smog pump. I want to get through emissions and with a good catted pipe i should be ok. I'm just worried the car will not run right (i want a nice cruising car).
 

joel5.0

Member
Jun 15, 2004
429
2
18
Puerto Rico
Jul 16, 2008
#20
  • Jul 16, 2008
  • #20
Yep.... the components behind the passenger side strut tower are the solenoids (actuators) that route the vacuum feed to control the thermactor valves + the EGR valve.
 
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

M
Engine Unexplainable Exhaust Pop and Gurgle
  • Mrnissen122
  • Feb 14, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
12
Views
527
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Feb 18, 2026
Noobz347
S
Cali Members, Get in Here! - Smog issue with possible error on 2007 Shelby GT Emissions label failed due to EGR
  • saldua
  • Mar 30, 2025
  • 2005 - 2014 S-197 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
26
Views
1K
2005 - 2014 S-197 Mustang -General/Talk- Apr 1, 2025
Noobz347
SURGING IDLE / NO IDLE CHECKLIST FOR 1996–1998 MUSTANG GT (4.6L 2V) - Work In Progress
  • Noobz347
  • Aug 30, 2025
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
0
Views
710
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- Aug 30, 2025
Noobz347
Drivetrain 83’ Glx convertible C5 Trans help!
  • JacksonJared2113
  • Dec 25, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
2
Views
368
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Dec 26, 2025
JacksonJared2113
Resolved Fixing a GT40P Valvetrain nightmare
  • foxbodyclark
  • May 21, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
7
Views
995
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech May 24, 2025
limp
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?