• Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech

Engine combo & gear ratio suggestions?

  • Thread starter Thread starter jesserose17
  • Start date Start date Dec 28, 2004
J

jesserose17

New Member
Aug 21, 2003
219
0
0
Southern CA
Dec 28, 2004
#1
  • Dec 28, 2004
  • #1
I have a 302 that was rebuilt by PO - Edelbrock Performer intake and 600 CFM Edelbrock Performer carb, with Performer cam (mild). Has Hooker competition headers, with 3" collectors, adapted to 2-1/2" dual exhaust. I have wide-ratio Toploader (1st gear 2.78) and 9" rear with 2.75 open. I have 26.1" tall tires. The overall ratio with 1st gear is 7.65. I normally don't drive on highways much and most of the time, I go no more than 55-60 mph on way to work. If I go to 3.50, the overall ratio would be 9.73. Would that be ideal with the engine powerband geared toward low-end torque? Or should I stick with 2.75?

I may try 1/4 mile someday... I've never done it.

I would appreciate your expertise & advice.
 

302 coupe

Founding Member
Mar 2, 2000
1,952
3
36
Macon, Ga.
Dec 28, 2004
#2
  • Dec 28, 2004
  • #2
I think 3.50's would work best in your application. I've heard from several sources that you want your 1st gear and rear gear to multiply out to 10, 9.73 is pretty darn close. I don't know if that theory has any real truth behind it though....
 

rbohm

Founding Member
Apr 12, 2002
6,698
550
204
tucson,az
Dec 28, 2004
#3
  • Dec 28, 2004
  • #3
yes, 3.50's are perfect for your combo, and your driving style.
 

ratio411

Founding Member
Apr 21, 2002
3,870
73
109
Pensacola FL
Dec 28, 2004
#4
  • Dec 28, 2004
  • #4
With the wide ratio and such lo-po parts, I would use a 3.25.
If you had an auto or close ratio, the 3.50s would be better.
My wide ratio with low gears and lo-po parts was very disappointing to drive, the engine was in it's power band for a very short time. More like driving a truck than a performance car.
The 3.25s would feel like a world of difference from what you have now.
You would also save some of the 'hit' in fuel economy.
Dave

Edit: If more rpm friendly parts are anticipated in the future, then I have to agree with the 3.50s. 3.25s for 'status quo'.
 
J

jesserose17

New Member
Aug 21, 2003
219
0
0
Southern CA
Dec 28, 2004
#5
  • Dec 28, 2004
  • #5
Guys - thanks for your opinions! It helps a lot.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

C
Suggestions for rear diff gears - 1969 Mach 351W 4v
  • cfauvel
  • Apr 8, 2024
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech
Replies
10
Views
2K
Classic Mustang Specific Tech Jun 27, 2024
cfauvel
C
6
Hey all,I’m putting together a 302 for my 1968 Mustang and wanted to post the combo + some questions to make sure I’m not missing crucial
  • 68_Disgustang
  • Feb 22, 2026
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
4
Views
949
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Jun 20, 2026
gray owl
G
Which one of these 3 intakes make the most sense for my 331 combo
  • from6to8
  • Jul 25, 2024
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Replies
7
Views
2K
1994 - 1995 Specific Tech Jul 26, 2024
AeroCoupe
Drivetrain 33 spline SN axle with ABS and parking brake build
  • revhead347
  • May 12, 2020
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Replies
2
Views
3K
1994 - 1995 Specific Tech May 12, 2020
revhead347
95 GTS - Engine Bucking at low speeds
  • doctorj357
  • Aug 24, 2018
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
6
Views
2K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Oct 26, 2018
doctorj357
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?