• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2.3L (N/A & Turbo) Tech

Engine rebuild kit?

  • Thread starter Thread starter jasoncarmony
  • Start date Start date Jul 13, 2004
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
First Prev 2 of 2
J

jasoncarmony

New Member
Mar 2, 2004
37
0
0
Live wherever the Air Force sends me. Right now I
Jul 15, 2004
#21
  • Jul 15, 2004
  • #21
I would love to swap in a complete turbo engine, but i have been unable to find one around here. I am in central texas with limited junk yards to check for, plus there are so many good ole' boys that have mustangs everywhere. I don't have the money for the ones on ebay. Thanks for all the input. I really appreciate all your time. I enjoy the car, its a mustang drop-top. So it is cool to cruise around in, but I need to get rid of the leaks. My "rear main seal" is leaking, along with several other leaks. What would i need to just to a complete rebuild, without trying to turbo the car?
 

Stinger

Founding Member
Jul 7, 2001
7,754
24
118
Basehor (Kansas City), KS
Jul 15, 2004
#22
  • Jul 15, 2004
  • #22
Get hold of the guy above that had the motor for 100 bucks...it couldn't be more than 250 to ship it to your door. That's 350 for virtually everything you need to drop the whole engine in and go.

JamesBaumann said:
Yes, you will need to swap in some turbo wiring harnesses
Click to expand...

Nope, you don't even use the turbo harness...just modify the stock mustang one.

BlackPony2000 said:
ok, so the only thing forged in the turbo motor is the pistons??? hmmmm, i'd be worried about the rods if i was going to be eventually pushing 25 psi..LMO..
Click to expand...

Well, you can worry while other people continue to do it with no ill effects

Ray III said:
you'll break the crankshaft before you break a rod.
Click to expand...

Nope, Joe Morgan made 700+ with a stock 2.3 crank, word has it a guy just made 962hp with a stock Ranger 2.5 crank...rods will go long before that (normally the 400 range).

Ray III said:
cast = hypereutectic.[
Click to expand...

Nope, not quite. They are two different pistons...hyper's are stronger than cast but more prone to failure if you detonate compared to forged.
 

silver pony

Founding Member
Jun 10, 2002
2,013
0
0
San Bernardino,CA USA 92405
Jul 15, 2004
#23
  • Jul 15, 2004
  • #23
pistons, exhuast manifold, turbo, turbohead (for ease of conversion), injectors, compuer, VAM, and various other parts will be needed to make your current N/A turbo, oh and you need to tap the oilpan for the return oil.
 
J

jasoncarmony

New Member
Mar 2, 2004
37
0
0
Live wherever the Air Force sends me. Right now I
Jul 15, 2004
#24
  • Jul 15, 2004
  • #24
Stinger, thanks, i am sure there is somewhere that i can look to find out how to modify the existing harness. Do you know where i can get that info?
 

silver pony

Founding Member
Jun 10, 2002
2,013
0
0
San Bernardino,CA USA 92405
Jul 15, 2004
#25
  • Jul 15, 2004
  • #25
hmmmm

http://projecthp.ford23.com/
 

Stinger

Founding Member
Jul 7, 2001
7,754
24
118
Basehor (Kansas City), KS
Jul 15, 2004
#26
  • Jul 15, 2004
  • #26
Haha, that's the third time my site has been posted in here...you ought to click on it
 
J

jasoncarmony

New Member
Mar 2, 2004
37
0
0
Live wherever the Air Force sends me. Right now I
Jul 15, 2004
#27
  • Jul 15, 2004
  • #27
i did, thanks
 

Ray III

New Member
Feb 10, 2004
586
0
0
fixin Boomhower's John Deere in Troy, NY
Jul 16, 2004
#28
  • Jul 16, 2004
  • #28
Stinger said:
Nope, not quite. They are two different pistons...hyper's are stronger than cast but more prone to failure if you detonate compared to forged.
Click to expand...

Hypereutectic is a description of how the material comes out of the casting process.

Hypoeutectic, eutectic, and hypereutectic are ALL cast aluminum. They just have molecular arrangements of different densities, thus the hyper is strongest.

www.google.com


as to the rods breaking, I knew something breaks at 400hp but I thought it was the crank... guess I'm mistaken
 

Stinger

Founding Member
Jul 7, 2001
7,754
24
118
Basehor (Kansas City), KS
Jul 16, 2004
#29
  • Jul 16, 2004
  • #29
Ray III said:
Hypereutectic is a description of how the material comes out of the casting process.

Hypoeutectic, eutectic, and hypereutectic are ALL cast aluminum. They just have molecular arrangements of different densities, thus the hyper is strongest.
Click to expand...

Agreed...and that makes them two different pistons as I stated (not one in the same as you called stock hypers).
 

351wcoupe

New Member
Feb 13, 2003
1,811
0
0
Manhattan, Kansas
Jul 16, 2004
#30
  • Jul 16, 2004
  • #30
I thought the differences between the three was the percentage of silicone?
 
B

BlackPony2000

New Member
Jul 1, 2004
92
0
0
Taylors, South Carolina
Jul 16, 2004
#31
  • Jul 16, 2004
  • #31
ok, so i looked it up... same crank, rods in the turbo as the NA 2.3, just different pistons... ok...now on to rings...any difference there? I always use the best, but are they different for the 2 engines? and i have heard that the gapless work the best on these engines... anybody know???
 

silver pony

Founding Member
Jun 10, 2002
2,013
0
0
San Bernardino,CA USA 92405
Jul 16, 2004
#32
  • Jul 16, 2004
  • #32
i would just by a rering kit from northernauto parts if I were you.
 

DougNuts

Founding Member
Jul 11, 2000
2,596
0
47
Georgetown Ky
Jul 18, 2004
#33
  • Jul 18, 2004
  • #33
I know we've covered this alot in here, but you can theoretically turbo a N/A motor if you rebuild it with forged, low compression pistons? I thought there was a bunch of other stuff that was different between the two, oil squirters?
 

silver pony

Founding Member
Jun 10, 2002
2,013
0
0
San Bernardino,CA USA 92405
Jul 18, 2004
#34
  • Jul 18, 2004
  • #34
silver pony said:
pistons, exhuast manifold, turbo, turbohead (for ease of conversion), injectors, computer, VAM, and various other parts will be needed to make your current N/A turbo, oh and you need to tap the oilpan for the return oil.
Click to expand...

oil feed lines, water lines if the turbo is watercooled... 91-93 are alittle more difficult.

by time you have bought all that you need to complete the swap you would have spent less just buying the turbo motor.
 
S

stangs4evr-roy

New Member
Mar 26, 2004
57
0
0
Jul 20, 2004
#35
  • Jul 20, 2004
  • #35
if you live in central texas you are right in the middle of svo country, you should check out this site:www.svoca.com these guys will find you a turbo motor and give you all the tech support youll need
 

stang2.3t

New Member
Jun 25, 2004
74
0
0
Spokane Washington
Jul 22, 2004
#36
  • Jul 22, 2004
  • #36
I have also found some info on this site, and like the pictures that were posted as well. http://140cilx.stangnet.com/index.html There is tons of info out there good luck in your search.
 

Instance

New Member
Jul 22, 2004
2
0
0
Omaha, NE
Jul 22, 2004
#37
  • Jul 22, 2004
  • #37
What about a '91 Ranger, guys? Is the 2.3l Pushrod 2v I4 the same in it as the 2.3 Stangs? Would making an N/A one turbocharged be doable, but take the same? There's room for a 302 in it with some fairly minor modifications, would that be a better bet? I was thinking the '82 or whatever, carb'd H.O. with the roller cam, if throwing boost at it isn't possible. Looking for cheap, cheap, cheap right now, but hoping to be able to continue to mod it and beef it up as time goes on. Also, suggest tranny for both? Has the stock 5 speed manual right now. The motor has 140,000 so it really neesd to be rebuilt either way, I believe. Can you get any performance out of an N/A 2.3 without spending a fortune?
 

Stinger

Founding Member
Jul 7, 2001
7,754
24
118
Basehor (Kansas City), KS
Jul 22, 2004
#38
  • Jul 22, 2004
  • #38
Rangers run the same engine...it's not a pushrod engine though, it's overhead cam.

There are tons of turbo rangers running around...check rangerpowersports.com
 

Ray III

New Member
Feb 10, 2004
586
0
0
fixin Boomhower's John Deere in Troy, NY
Jul 22, 2004
#39
  • Jul 22, 2004
  • #39
351wcoupe said:
I thought the differences between the three was the percentage of silicone?
Click to expand...

yeah thats true, AND hypereutectic is also denser.

hypereutectic castings are actually stronger than forgings. BUT they shatter when you wail on them, while forged pistons just elastically deform.
 

Ray III

New Member
Feb 10, 2004
586
0
0
fixin Boomhower's John Deere in Troy, NY
Jul 22, 2004
#40
  • Jul 22, 2004
  • #40
DougNuts said:
I know we've covered this alot in here, but you can theoretically turbo a N/A motor if you rebuild it with forged, low compression pistons? I thought there was a bunch of other stuff that was different between the two, oil squirters?
Click to expand...

nope just the piston and I THINK a lower compression cylinder head (with the forged piston being same volume and compression height?).

all 2.3 motors have the same forged rods with oil squirter holes in them, which are really intended for the turbo but are nice to have for the N/A.
 
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
First Prev 2 of 2
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Engine Suggestions on an engine rebuild. Stock cam/GT40Ps or aftermarket on both for a fun weekend driver?
  • MadSquirrelTech
  • Apr 28, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2
Replies
23
Views
627
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech May 7, 2026
MadSquirrelTech
5
Foxbody Intro
  • 5.0Sucio
  • May 26, 2026
  • The Welcome Wagon
Replies
1
Views
75
The Welcome Wagon May 26, 2026
Noobz347
H
Forced Induction On3 Turbo Kit- Parts list NEEDED - 302 Stock Motor
  • Hirothecool1
  • Feb 27, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2
Replies
21
Views
902
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Mar 7, 2026
slow84lx
S
S
Cobra 8.8 differential rebuild shop question
  • Sestemybe
  • Aug 5, 2025
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
4
Views
317
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- Nov 15, 2025
baileygruwell
B
H
Ongoing Battle With Hydraulic Lifters
  • hailer06
  • Jun 8, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
7
Views
180
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jun 9, 2026
Noobz347
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2.3L (N/A & Turbo) Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?