• Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-

Evenly Matched..??

  • Thread starter Thread starter raindance
  • Start date Start date Feb 4, 2008
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last
R

raindance

New Member
Jan 31, 2008
3
0
0
Feb 4, 2008
#1
  • Feb 4, 2008
  • #1
Hey guys, my cousin has a pretty much stock 95 LT1 6 speed Camaro. I was talking to him today about car advice and he knows i'm more of a Ford guy...so you can imagine all the stuff he was shoving down my throat about how Chevy is better etc etc. Ofcoarse we now get into 1/4 rants lol saying i'll be faster...no i'll be faster lol. His car has a cat back exhaust and a cold air intake. He told me he's gonna install gears springtime probably 3.73...

Now he does know that i'm delaying my mustang purchase cause i'll be buying a newer 99-02..not the earlier models i decided on (thanks to you guys i got good advice on why to just wait and get the newer engine). How would a stock 99+GT 5 speed go against his car..? Even if i do CAI and cat back can i even match him.?? I do believe the Stang has the power to weight ratio advantage. How bout if we both have the same mods and gears-both 3.73, wouldn't this be a drivers race..??

Oh and btw we will settle this in english town NJ-good 1/4 strip down there to legally speed.
 

joshheat25

Member
Nov 8, 2004
871
0
16
Delaware
Feb 4, 2008
#2
  • Feb 4, 2008
  • #2
no.. you should beat him easy it's not called a Slomaro for nothin! but those years weren't very fast.
 

mazen189

Member
Jul 31, 2007
424
0
16
I.E. southern california
Feb 5, 2008
#3
  • Feb 5, 2008
  • #3
arent the LT1's like.....baby LS1's?
 
S

Stangdriver13

Member
Jul 31, 2006
44
0
6
Feb 5, 2008
#4
  • Feb 5, 2008
  • #4
i'd say depends on if he can drive but with my catback, intake and driver skill i could be my friends 95 firebird with a 6sp and he had just a catback. We never got a great head to head race but after driving both cars my car pulled harder and more evenly through the powerband. Lt1's pull harder up top imo. I did destory a 95 auto camaro with a ypipe, catback, and lid 3-4 cars from 50-95
 

blackfang

Founding Member
Dec 17, 2001
1,290
1
39
Richmond, Va
Feb 5, 2008
#5
  • Feb 5, 2008
  • #5
joshheat25 said:
no.. you should beat him easy it's not called a Slomaro for nothin! but those years weren't very fast.
Click to expand...
Wrong!

Hate to say it a LT1 with a cai and catback can run 13.6-13.8 with a good driver. Stock they have gone as fast as 13.5 so don't underestimate the LT1.
 

98COBRA281

10 Year Member
Nov 24, 2007
1,348
30
59
Port St. Lucie, Florida
Feb 5, 2008
#6
  • Feb 5, 2008
  • #6
my friend has the exact same car but its bone stock, its very close between us but im am a little faster, but mine is also a npi, the lt1 makes 275hp 325 tq
 

d98gt

Founding Member
Mar 14, 2002
4,505
59
204
SE Texas
Feb 5, 2008
#7
  • Feb 5, 2008
  • #7
My brother has an automatic LT1 that he rarely even drives. It ran a 14.17 stock and hasn't seen the track since a few free-mods (yes..freemods are actually REAL on lt1/ls1 cars) and exhaust/intake.
 

forum155pl

New Member
Jul 11, 2006
520
0
0
the 509
Feb 5, 2008
#8
  • Feb 5, 2008
  • #8
a CAI and catback will gain you close to nothing..
 

blackfang

Founding Member
Dec 17, 2001
1,290
1
39
Richmond, Va
Feb 5, 2008
#9
  • Feb 5, 2008
  • #9
Buddy of mine's 97 LT1 automatic with a cai and catback runs 13.6's...... go figure.
 

d98gt

Founding Member
Mar 14, 2002
4,505
59
204
SE Texas
Feb 5, 2008
#10
  • Feb 5, 2008
  • #10
blackfang said:
Buddy of mine's 97 LT1 automatic with a cai and catback runs 13.6's...... go figure.
Click to expand...

He was referring to the mustang guy
 

blackfang

Founding Member
Dec 17, 2001
1,290
1
39
Richmond, Va
Feb 5, 2008
#11
  • Feb 5, 2008
  • #11
d98gt said:
He was referring to the mustang guy
Click to expand...

I was actually referring to your 14.17 ET comment
 

d98gt

Founding Member
Mar 14, 2002
4,505
59
204
SE Texas
Feb 5, 2008
#12
  • Feb 5, 2008
  • #12
Just the intake on those cars alone adds quite a bit of power. They respond way better the the little 281
 
D

darkside03gt

Member
Feb 19, 2007
851
8
18
Sacramento CA
Feb 5, 2008
#13
  • Feb 5, 2008
  • #13
mazen189 said:
arent the LT1's like.....baby LS1's?
Click to expand...

No. they have the same displacement but thats about it. LT1s are just a revised classic small block. the ls1 is a whole nother beast its all aluminum and has heads that flow like you wouldnt believe. those two engines arent even in the same ballpark. And I know because I used to be a chevy guy till I bought the stang hense the name darkside.
 

98COBRA281

10 Year Member
Nov 24, 2007
1,348
30
59
Port St. Lucie, Florida
Feb 5, 2008
#14
  • Feb 5, 2008
  • #14
accutaly lt1=350ci ls1=346ci
 

mazen189

Member
Jul 31, 2007
424
0
16
I.E. southern california
Feb 5, 2008
#15
  • Feb 5, 2008
  • #15
dude...win or lose a race..

you'll ALWAYS win on looks....and quality.
 
0

01GTang

New Member
Dec 26, 2007
10
0
0
Southern, MN
Feb 5, 2008
#16
  • Feb 5, 2008
  • #16
I had raced a 97 camaro (lt1) convertible when I first bought my car.
The camaro was mostly stock other then a k&n intake and overdrive pullies from what I could see, but heard that he had an SCT tuner from someone later but cant say for sure.
My car (01 GT) having just bought it only had at the time 3.73 gears, K&N filter and suspension mods.
we lined up on a 1/4 and I had him from off the line on each of the 3 times we raced and would gain steadilly from the start every time...
I was consitantly 2 car lengths or more ahead of him.
I was not impressed by that car, but I know an ls1 would have killed me at the time...
 
D

darkside03gt

Member
Feb 19, 2007
851
8
18
Sacramento CA
Feb 5, 2008
#17
  • Feb 5, 2008
  • #17
98COBRA281 said:
accutaly lt1=350ci ls1=346ci
Click to expand...

yah the 4 cubes hurts right? they both list as 5.7leters.
 

98COBRA281

10 Year Member
Nov 24, 2007
1,348
30
59
Port St. Lucie, Florida
Feb 5, 2008
#18
  • Feb 5, 2008
  • #18
yea there both 5.7 litres bucause there so close, but not the same displacement, a 302 and a 305 are both 5.0s, but the 305 is still bigger
 

blackfang

Founding Member
Dec 17, 2001
1,290
1
39
Richmond, Va
Feb 6, 2008
#19
  • Feb 6, 2008
  • #19
01GTang said:
I had raced a 97 camaro (lt1) convertible when I first bought my car.
The camaro was mostly stock other then a k&n intake and overdrive pullies from what I could see, but heard that he had an SCT tuner from someone later but cant say for sure.
My car (01 GT) having just bought it only had at the time 3.73 gears, K&N filter and suspension mods.
we lined up on a 1/4 and I had him from off the line on each of the 3 times we raced and would gain steadilly from the start every time...
I was consitantly 2 car lengths or more ahead of him.
I was not impressed by that car, but I know an ls1 would have killed me at the time...
Click to expand...

He didn't have an SCT tuner. He could have had another type.

A bolt on 99+ GT can beat a stock LT1. No doubt about it. However, you mod that LT1 and it can easily be a different story.
 
0

01GTang

New Member
Dec 26, 2007
10
0
0
Southern, MN
Feb 6, 2008
#20
  • Feb 6, 2008
  • #20
blackfang said:
He didn't have an SCT tuner. He could have had another type.

A bolt on 99+ GT can beat a stock LT1. No doubt about it. However, you mod that LT1 and it can easily be a different story.
Click to expand...


lol I see that now, I was trying to think of what it was, but it was a while ago...
 
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

I
Engine Help requested in identifying how to resolve engine light issue
  • Ianslaney
  • Oct 4, 2026
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Replies
1
Views
158
SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech Oct 4, 2026
Bullitt347
Most ridiculous / dishonest work you have heard a shop recommend?
  • SchwarzStock
  • Jul 19, 2026
  • Off-Topic Hangout
Replies
4
Views
130
Off-Topic Hangout Jul 20, 2026
SchwarzStock
Progress Thread 91GTstroked 90 7 up convertible build
  • 91GTstroked
  • Apr 18, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
8
Views
448
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- May 22, 2026
91GTstroked
J
Switched to e85 on the 3v and now it won't run right.
  • jcowdough
  • Aug 24, 2025
  • 2005 - 2014 S-197 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
1
Views
219
2005 - 2014 S-197 Mustang -General/Talk- Aug 24, 2025
Noobz347
Z
Progress Thread zeth194 - New Guy on the Block
  • zeth194
  • Mar 19, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
10
Views
736
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Apr 26, 2026
LILCBRA
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?