• Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • SVT Tech Forum

Exhaust Baffles

  • Thread starter Thread starter Rad Ray
  • Start date Start date Oct 8, 2003
R

Rad Ray

New Member
Jul 17, 2003
23
0
1
Oct 8, 2003
#1
  • Oct 8, 2003
  • #1
Just installed a set of Bassani aft-cat exhausts. They work well, but have in the chrome tips baffles that can be easily removed. I've tried it and they actually sounds more quiet. Does someone have any information on performance with and without the baffles? Thanks in advance for sharing your knowledge and experience. It'll be greatly appreciated!
 
S

SnakeBite98

New Member
Jul 11, 2003
94
0
0
Poway, CA
Oct 8, 2003
#2
  • Oct 8, 2003
  • #2
its supposed to be louder without the baffles not quieter.
 

tfritz

Founding Member
Sep 27, 2001
886
1
0
SoCal
Oct 8, 2003
#3
  • Oct 8, 2003
  • #3
I have the full cat back Bassanis and I took the baffels out make a night and day difference. Without my baffles is much more louder and more drone in the drone zone.

Can't say I've noticed any performance change, don't think you would for it wouldn't be enough to notice if there was.

I keep the baffles out because it sounds awsome.
 
R

Rad Ray

New Member
Jul 17, 2003
23
0
1
Oct 13, 2003
#4
  • Oct 13, 2003
  • #4
tfritz said:
I have the full cat back Bassanis and I took the baffels out make a night and day difference. Without my baffles is much more louder and more drone in the drone zone.

Can't say I've noticed any performance change, don't think you would for it wouldn't be enough to notice if there was.

I keep the baffles out because it sounds awsome.
Click to expand...

Thanks for the reply, but I'm stumped. I did a comparison again with and without the baffles and it really is much quieter without them installed. I even borrowed a friends' noise-level meter (cheap one from Radio Shack) and it was around 75 dB SPL with them installed at idel and 12" from the pipes, and 72 dB without them. Could they actually be frequency specific resonators as opposed to baffles (i.e., dampers)? I don't doubt your results, but this is wierd! I too found no performance difference, but have read that the on-board computer may not re-set until 600-800 miles and I have only about 400 miles on mine.
 

BlackOnBlackCobra96

Founding Member
Dec 11, 1999
800
0
16
Cleveland, OH & Detroit, MI
Oct 13, 2003
#5
  • Oct 13, 2003
  • #5
Wierd. In my car, I'd go deaf without the baffles. What kind of mid-pipe are you running?
 
R

Rad Ray

New Member
Jul 17, 2003
23
0
1
Oct 14, 2003
#6
  • Oct 14, 2003
  • #6
BlackOnBlackCobra96 said:
Wierd. In my car, I'd go deaf without the baffles. What kind of mid-pipe are you running?
Click to expand...

It's stock. If you come up with any ideas I'd appreciate it!
 

Hissmann

Founding Member
Sep 5, 2002
243
0
0
West Virginia
Oct 14, 2003
#7
  • Oct 14, 2003
  • #7
Rad Ray said:
Thanks for the reply, but I'm stumped. I did a comparison again with and without the baffles and it really is much quieter without them installed. I even borrowed a friends' noise-level meter (cheap one from Radio Shack) and it was around 75 dB SPL with them installed at idel and 12" from the pipes, and 72 dB without them. Could they actually be frequency specific resonators as opposed to baffles (i.e., dampers)? I don't doubt your results, but this is wierd! I too found no performance difference, but have read that the on-board computer may not re-set until 600-800 miles and I have only about 400 miles on mine.
Click to expand...

you must have the batteries in upside down in the noise-o-meter. There is a reason why they call them baffles. Not anti-baffles.
 

discot

New Member
Mar 11, 2003
5
0
0
Boston, MA
Oct 15, 2003
#8
  • Oct 15, 2003
  • #8
Did you remove the fiberglass cloth from around the baffles? That would make them louder. I thought it was packing material at first, then called Bassani and found out it was functional.
 
R

Rad Ray

New Member
Jul 17, 2003
23
0
1
Oct 18, 2003
#9
  • Oct 18, 2003
  • #9
Thanks discot. I'll give it a try.

Hissman - here's a tip for you. Modern electrical devices do not operate with the batteries "up side down." It reverses the polarity in DC circuits. Please use the forum for helpful exchanges.
 

PaulL

New Member
Dec 23, 2002
81
0
0
Monument, CO
Oct 24, 2003
#10
  • Oct 24, 2003
  • #10
Don't misunderstand the post about the fiberglass wrap ... it should be left on the baffle.

I think you may find that they reduce the noise much more at higher rpms. On my car (Magnaflows with Bassani baffles), the sound level drops about 2 or 3 dB at wide open throttle, from 95 dB to 92 dB. (at 50')

I also dynoed with and without the baffles ... not a bit of difference.
 

Hissmann

Founding Member
Sep 5, 2002
243
0
0
West Virginia
Oct 24, 2003
#11
  • Oct 24, 2003
  • #11
Rad Ray said:
Thanks discot. I'll give it a try.

Hissman - here's a tip for you. Modern electrical devices do not operate with the batteries "up side down." It reverses the polarity in DC circuits. Please use the forum for helpful exchanges.
Click to expand...


It's called a Joke sherlock.
 

cobrar77

New Member
Jun 19, 2003
23
0
1
Oct 28, 2003
#12
  • Oct 28, 2003
  • #12
Does anyone know if there is a power difference with and without the baffles?
 
R

Rad Ray

New Member
Jul 17, 2003
23
0
1
Dec 14, 2003
#13
  • Dec 14, 2003
  • #13
Hissmann said:
It's called a Joke sherlock.
Click to expand...

Funny. Do you write your own material?
 

Hissmann

Founding Member
Sep 5, 2002
243
0
0
West Virginia
Dec 14, 2003
#14
  • Dec 14, 2003
  • #14
Rad Ray said:
Funny. Do you write your own material?
Click to expand...


Why do you want a Job?
 

tfritz

Founding Member
Sep 27, 2001
886
1
0
SoCal
Dec 15, 2003
#15
  • Dec 15, 2003
  • #15
Hissmann said:
It's called a Joke sherlock.
Click to expand...

It's all in the timing...and that wasn't the time.
 
R

Rad Ray

New Member
Jul 17, 2003
23
0
1
May 15, 2020
#16
  • May 15, 2020
  • #16
tfritz said:
It's all in the timing...and that wasn't the time.
Click to expand...
You're the joke!
 
R

Rad Ray

New Member
Jul 17, 2003
23
0
1
May 15, 2020
#17
  • May 15, 2020
  • #17
Hissmann said:
Why do you want a Job?
Click to expand...
Yea, I need the work, but not around idiots!
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Paint and Body Frame rail dimensions
  • keel
  • Jan 30, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
25
Views
971
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Feb 13, 2026
keel
L
Is catback worth it over axle backs?
  • Lorencarson
  • May 15, 2025
  • 2005 - 2014 S-197 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
2
Views
648
2005 - 2014 S-197 Mustang -General/Talk- May 15, 2025
89ripper
A
Discussion on mild budget build/ top end
  • Acesario
  • Feb 21, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
20
Views
661
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Feb 23, 2026
General karthief
S
Fuel ‘88 GT Runs Rich Cold — Fixes Itself When I Unplug Sensors (ECT, MAF, O2, etc.)
  • Sufarry
  • Nov 6, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
12
Views
742
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Nov 9, 2025
Mustang5L5
Fox HAD ENOUGH OF EXHAUST FUMES!!!
  • PonyGTrider
  • Aug 12, 2024
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
18
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Aug 13, 2024
PonyGTrider
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • SVT Tech Forum
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?