• Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech

Exhaust..(Performance VS Sound)

  • Thread starter Thread starter TopDeadCenter
  • Start date Start date Jul 15, 2004
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last

TopDeadCenter

New Member
May 15, 2004
109
0
0
Jul 15, 2004
#1
  • Jul 15, 2004
  • #1
hmm....the never ending debate...tell me what you guys think of this.

I have a 98 gt (which as some know has the upgraded exhaust mani that match the 99's ( so we're told ). I have BBK Off road H and 2 chamber flows dumped at the rear..now dont get me wrong it sounds Hella mean and loud and precise..specially when crusing fast as i call it.

well a lot of people say! i want that famous mustang sound and get 2 chambers and are like its not loud enough....i really wonder what the sound difference is between offroad h and x's catted or not.

When i first got my car my friend gave me his borla (non race) and they sucked 2 me..i mean they sounded ok at WOT but cruise and etc just yuck..so i took it back 2 the dealership and put on 2 chambers..and it sounded like that sound that u can hear from a mile away..when we put her on rams the exhaust tech. guy said to rev her..and he was like to me thats performace (this was with the borlas)...so i really wonder (see end)

Which do you guys prefer? X pipes or H pipes...keep in mind..that a catback is a catback sure..and headers are headers..but the sound still hasto past thru the mid pipe..catted or not..

my question is which one do yall like better! and which preforms better..x or h...---trey gsg

(end) i really wonder..which is better..sound or performance..
 

smokin'Red35th

Member
Jan 9, 2004
493
0
16
Las Vegas, NV
Jul 15, 2004
#2
  • Jul 15, 2004
  • #2
TopDeadCenter said:
it sounds Hella mean
Click to expand...
Your from california, arent you.
 

TopDeadCenter

New Member
May 15, 2004
109
0
0
Jul 15, 2004
#3
  • Jul 15, 2004
  • #3
hmm texas..5 mins away from the fastest best racetrack in the us
 

TopDeadCenter

New Member
May 15, 2004
109
0
0
Jul 15, 2004
#4
  • Jul 15, 2004
  • #4
ive heard some hella mean sounding 4.6's with x pipes...
 

mity2

I like Pro3 and all I got was this crappy CT.
Jul 24, 2003
2,872
3
48
StateCollege PA
Jul 15, 2004
#5
  • Jul 15, 2004
  • #5
TopDeadCenter said:
ive heard some hella mean sounding 4.6's with x pipes...
Click to expand...

never heard 4.6 with Prochamber and magnaflow do you ???

with LT and X and magnaflow is crazy gutsy sounding too
 

smokin'Red35th

Member
Jan 9, 2004
493
0
16
Las Vegas, NV
Jul 15, 2004
#6
  • Jul 15, 2004
  • #6
im sure you already know this. but im gonna throw it out there anyway. if you are looking for what sounds the best try www.mustangexhaust.com tons of sound clips categorized by x-and h-pipe.
 

kboy262

Active Member
Apr 20, 2003
437
0
26
Atlanta-Kennesaw
Jul 15, 2004
#7
  • Jul 15, 2004
  • #7
I think the best sound comes from a H-pipe. It gives it more rumble and deepness. Definetly with some cams. I did the X-pipe thing, Dr. Gas and Bassani, and was not really all that impressed.
 

LI98GTStang

Founding Member
Jun 22, 2000
1,715
0
36
L.I., NY
Jul 15, 2004
#8
  • Jul 15, 2004
  • #8
I have heard a bunch of stangs in different combos so as far as sound goes my opinion is that O/R Hs and catted Xs sound the best. To go along with the H configuration, I love the flowmaster sound and with the Catted X - Bassani.
There have been many posts and articles that show that X's make more hp up top over the H design. It's not too significant with near stock cars, but on S/C'd or turbo'd ones, the difference can be quite a bit.
Where's that Magnaflow thread when you need it.
 

abouttobeglue

Founding Member
Nov 25, 2001
529
1
18
birmingham al
Jul 15, 2004
#9
  • Jul 15, 2004
  • #9
x and 1 chambers sound like youre bringing hell with you
 

stangman

15 Year Member
Jul 10, 2003
2,690
10
69
in a 3 bed, 2 bath
Jul 15, 2004
#10
  • Jul 15, 2004
  • #10
prochamber & flowpaths (longtubes if ya want ) sound amazing a prochamber gives you a nice mix between a X & a H pipe. i like the sound of it so much it's been on my last two stangs
 

TopDeadCenter

New Member
May 15, 2004
109
0
0
Jul 15, 2004
#11
  • Jul 15, 2004
  • #11
hm

a few years from now..when my baby is sc'd..yeah..magnaflow catted x, 2 chambers, and LTs...but for now, bbk offroad h people makes enough people in town druel..specially the 17 year old kids who could barely afford the note and insurance on there mustangs...yet alone to Mod---******* trey
 
0

01GT281

New Member
Jul 1, 2004
104
0
0
kansas
Jul 15, 2004
#12
  • Jul 15, 2004
  • #12
I have american thunder with an o/r flowtech H. It sounds mean as hell and keeps the rice away. My original plan was to do MAC LT's , prochamber , and magnapacks. I have heard the magnapacks in person and they are mean sounding w/just the catback on a stock car. REAL deep throaty sound. More than 2 chambers. I also have been told by a penske mechanic/drag racer/friend that the H pipe will sound more rumbly while the X pipe will have more of an exotic sound. However, the X pipe will win in the upper RPM range over the x pipe BUT I don't think it's more than 2-3hp. I'd rather have the pissed off and full of rage sound of an H rather than the raspiness of an x.

Just my .04
 

96WhiteNight

New Member
May 11, 2004
303
0
0
Carlisle, PA
Jul 15, 2004
#13
  • Jul 15, 2004
  • #13
Flows

I have a MAC off road H with flowmaster and i love how the car sounds and how it turns heads as i go by. And the car sounds mean as hell when i kick on the nitrous So i am a fan of the H
 

DBMSTNG

I fantasize about it being BIG!
Founding Member
Apr 23, 2002
2,120
0
56
not quite here
Jul 15, 2004
#14
  • Jul 15, 2004
  • #14
01GT281 said:
I have american thunder with an o/r flowtech H. It sounds mean as hell and keeps the rice away. My original plan was to do MAC LT's , prochamber , and magnapacks. I have heard the magnapacks in person and they are mean sounding w/just the catback on a stock car. REAL deep throaty sound. More than 2 chambers. I also have been told by a penske mechanic/drag racer/friend that the H pipe will sound more rumbly while the X pipe will have more of an exotic sound. However, the X pipe will win in the upper RPM range over the x pipe BUT I don't think it's more than 2-3hp. I'd rather have the pissed off and full of rage sound of an H rather than the raspiness of an x.

Just my .04
Click to expand...


the difference can be as much as 10-15rwhp between an H and an X. i prefer the low end rumble of an H, but like the high rpm sound and power from my X.
 

Steve777

New Member
Jun 21, 2004
208
0
0
Pittsburgh, PA
Jul 15, 2004
#15
  • Jul 15, 2004
  • #15
X pipe has a smoother sound than the H pipe ...people say the H is deeper, but the X is plenty deep, just smooths out the note and gives it more of a race car scream rather than a burbling H pipe sound. Catted X with Flowmasters sounds mean ...and O/R X sounds even meaner ...but definetly go with X for sound and performance
 

dmarco_4u

New Member
Mar 9, 2004
194
0
0
Jul 15, 2004
#16
  • Jul 15, 2004
  • #16
c2see21 said:
prochamber & flowpaths (longtubes if ya want ) sound amazing a prochamber gives you a nice mix between a X & a H pipe. i like the sound of it so much it's been on my last two stangs
Click to expand...

I have to agree with c2see21, prochamber is like best of both worlds X and H pipes
 
S

sjrtx

New Member
Mar 21, 2004
151
0
0
Houston-NW side
Jul 15, 2004
#17
  • Jul 15, 2004
  • #17
where at in texas? if you were in the NW houston area-you could come listen to my setup...
 

Tylerb59

Banned
Mar 7, 2003
1,895
0
0
Arlington, WA
Jul 15, 2004
#18
  • Jul 15, 2004
  • #18
Sound = Flowmaster
Performance = Magnaflow
 

Defleshed

Satanic Mechanic
Nov 30, 2003
10,569
1
0
In Torment, In Hell
Jul 15, 2004
#19
  • Jul 15, 2004
  • #19
offroad X, LT cermaic headers, and some straight through mufflers (dynomax (not the turbos), magnaflow, SLP) if you want performance.
 

kirkyg

Founding Member
Jun 14, 2002
3,568
1
56
Beaumont, TX
Jul 15, 2004
#20
  • Jul 15, 2004
  • #20
1-2 ponies difference in any muffler. any aftermarket muffler will give you a little better flow over stock and thats all you need. The most restrictive part of the exhaust is the catback. Replace with a catless offroad pipe and you'll gain a good 8-12hp

kirkyg
 
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

S
1998 Mustang Gt Rattling sound, cannot locate. Video included
  • studerman1
  • Mar 31, 2026
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
8
Views
249
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- Apr 1, 2026
studerman1
S
L
Is catback worth it over axle backs?
  • Lorencarson
  • May 15, 2025
  • 2005 - 2014 S-197 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
2
Views
695
2005 - 2014 S-197 Mustang -General/Talk- May 15, 2025
89ripper
1
Engine Motor swap from a 2003 Explorer
  • 1996mustang new
  • Oct 9, 2025
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Replies
7
Views
616
SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech Oct 16, 2025
squeak93
Progress Thread The Mach Returns - Update/build thread
  • squeak93
  • Feb 20, 2026
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
8
Views
390
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- Aug 3, 2026
squeak93
K
Engine 2000 Mustang GT - Fuel issue post-blown spark plug repair
  • kenster1092
  • Feb 26, 2026
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Replies
4
Views
380
SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech Mar 10, 2026
kenster1092
K
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?