• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech

experienced engine builders chime in

  • Thread starter Thread starter Cclaro
  • Start date Start date Oct 4, 2021
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
First Prev 3 of 3
S

Shawn_Mc

Member
Oct 1, 2021
40
12
18
Anahiem
Oct 14, 2021
#41
  • Oct 14, 2021
  • #41
I looked all over the place for those flow numbers. I'll do that tonight and see what it comes up with.
 
C

Cclaro

Member
Aug 1, 2020
45
6
18
FL
Oct 14, 2021
#42
  • Oct 14, 2021
  • #42
Shawn_Mc said:
I looked all over the place for those flow numbers. I'll do that tonight and see what it comes up with.
Click to expand...
Curious to see what it’ll do. Can provide more cam specs if needed
 
Reactions: Shawn_Mc
S

Shawn_Mc

Member
Oct 1, 2021
40
12
18
Anahiem
Oct 14, 2021
#43
  • Oct 14, 2021
  • #43
Cclaro said:
10:1 compression seems a little bit high for boost dont you think? I’d hate to restrict the car to just race gas or e85
Click to expand...
If he kept the boost to a reasonable level (5-6) and the timing to mid 20's, he'd probably be ok on 93 pump if the water temps were under control.
 
S

Shawn_Mc

Member
Oct 1, 2021
40
12
18
Anahiem
Oct 14, 2021
#44
  • Oct 14, 2021
  • #44
Cclaro said:
Curious to see what it’ll do. Can provide more cam specs if needed
Click to expand...
Yeah, post the cam card if you've got it. I'll even screw around with some boost numbers.
 

Hoytster

I don't dare do that to my Knob
20+ Year Stangneter
Dec 30, 2002
1,069
700
164
Cornwall, PA
Oct 14, 2021
#45
  • Oct 14, 2021
  • #45
Drivetrain loss is not static, it's a percentage which is typically calculated at 15% for a manual (on the high side). That gets us to 430. Typical total accessory lose is usually 15-25HP. These are on the high end, assuming the alternator is putting out 100 amps plus, full RPM on the water pump and power steering pump, ect.
 

Hoytster

I don't dare do that to my Knob
20+ Year Stangneter
Dec 30, 2002
1,069
700
164
Cornwall, PA
Oct 14, 2021
#46
  • Oct 14, 2021
  • #46
The 11r head design allows you to run more comp with boost. My engine with the 9.3 comp is planned for 20+ pounds once I change chargers. With your comp, you could go well into the 10's on pump, keeping your intake temps down.
 
Reactions: Shawn_Mc
C

Cclaro

Member
Aug 1, 2020
45
6
18
FL
Oct 14, 2021
#47
  • Oct 14, 2021
  • #47
Shawn_Mc said:
If he kept the boost to a reasonable level (5-6) and the timing to mid 20's, he'd probably be ok on 93 pump if the water temps were under control.
Click to expand...
I keep it at around 180 without ac around town. With ac depending on how hot the day is it’ll creep to the low 200s
 
S

Shawn_Mc

Member
Oct 1, 2021
40
12
18
Anahiem
Oct 14, 2021
#48
  • Oct 14, 2021
  • #48
I just updated my DynoSim6, so I'll get that info back tonight. Ive got some stuff to do.

As a side question, what ECU are you running?
 
Reactions: Hoytster
S

Shawn_Mc

Member
Oct 1, 2021
40
12
18
Anahiem
Oct 14, 2021
#49
  • Oct 14, 2021
  • #49
Hoytster said:
Drivetrain loss is not static, it's a percentage which is typically calculated at 15% for a manual (on the high side). That gets us to 430. Typical total accessory lose is usually 15-25HP. These are on the high end, assuming the alternator is putting out 100 amps plus, full RPM on the water pump and power steering pump, ect.
Click to expand...
you can work the loss as a percentage, but it wont be the same for each engine. An alternator that requires 15-20hp at RPM X is going to require that HP regardless of how many Gross HP are turning it. IE a 1000 hp engine is still going to suffer the 20hp loss, just like a 400hp engine was, turning the same alternator at the same speed. Does that make sense?
 

Hoytster

I don't dare do that to my Knob
20+ Year Stangneter
Dec 30, 2002
1,069
700
164
Cornwall, PA
Oct 14, 2021
#50
  • Oct 14, 2021
  • #50
Shawn_Mc said:
you can work the loss as a percentage, but it wont be the same for each engine. An alternator that requires 15-20hp at RPM X is going to require that HP regardless of how many Gross HP are turning it. IE a 1000 hp engine is still going to suffer the 20hp loss, just like a 400hp engine was, turning the same alternator at the same speed. Does that make sense?
Click to expand...
I think you might have misunderstood me, only the driveline is a percentage. Driveline loses are primarily frictional losses which increase as power output through the driveline increased. The accessory loss I stated of 15-25HP is the typical measured accessory loss of the alternator, ect on a Foxbody, which is static. Basically the same thing you just said, I think.
 
Reactions: Shawn_Mc
S

Shawn_Mc

Member
Oct 1, 2021
40
12
18
Anahiem
Oct 14, 2021
#51
  • Oct 14, 2021
  • #51
What I found using a Comp XFI236HR-14 236/248 Hydraulic Roller Cam ( https://www.compcams.com/xfi-computer-controlled-236_248-hydraulic-roller-cam-for-ford-351w.html ). The Comp grind is only .579 lift. I stretched it to .608 for these tests.
The first one is at straight up degrees. The second is -4 from suggested. Also, note the ignition timing...I wish the simulator would let you pick a better combustion chamber. They give you 3 to choose from from each (flat, wedge and a Hemi/Pentroof) The ignition timing setting is on auto in the Sim. Your results obviously varied. I entered the flow numbers at each point of lift off the TFS spec. Spec'd a high performance open plenum manifold with a 1000cfm throttle.

The last one is advanced 4 degrees. Look at the meat in the middle. That's got street car written all over it.

Looks like this page is reversing the order of the pics as I post them. Highest number is -4, middle number is 0 and lowest peak is +4, but the middle of the power is the best at +4, by far.


 
Reactions: 7991LXnSHO
C

Cclaro

Member
Aug 1, 2020
45
6
18
FL
Oct 16, 2021
#52
  • Oct 16, 2021
  • #52
Shawn_Mc said:
I just updated my DynoSim6, so I'll get that info back tonight. Ive got some stuff to do.

As a side question, what ECU are you running?
Click to expand...
Terminator x
 
C

Cclaro

Member
Aug 1, 2020
45
6
18
FL
Oct 16, 2021
#53
  • Oct 16, 2021
  • #53
Shawn_Mc said:
What I found using a Comp XFI236HR-14 236/248 Hydraulic Roller Cam ( https://www.compcams.com/xfi-computer-controlled-236_248-hydraulic-roller-cam-for-ford-351w.html ). The Comp grind is only .579 lift. I stretched it to .608 for these tests.
The first one is at straight up degrees. The second is -4 from suggested. Also, note the ignition timing...I wish the simulator would let you pick a better combustion chamber. They give you 3 to choose from from each (flat, wedge and a Hemi/Pentroof) The ignition timing setting is on auto in the Sim. Your results obviously varied. I entered the flow numbers at each point of lift off the TFS spec. Spec'd a high performance open plenum manifold with a 1000cfm throttle.

The last one is advanced 4 degrees. Look at the meat in the middle. That's got street car written all over it.

Looks like this page is reversing the order of the pics as I post them. Highest number is -4, middle number is 0 and lowest peak is +4, but the middle of the power is the best at +4, by far.


Click to expand...
Yeah the ign timing is way off from what it realistically would be, lost like 15 horse bumping up the timing to 31 if I remember correctly.
 
C

Cclaro

Member
Aug 1, 2020
45
6
18
FL
Oct 16, 2021
#54
  • Oct 16, 2021
  • #54
Shawn_Mc said:
What I found using a Comp XFI236HR-14 236/248 Hydraulic Roller Cam ( https://www.compcams.com/xfi-computer-controlled-236_248-hydraulic-roller-cam-for-ford-351w.html ). The Comp grind is only .579 lift. I stretched it to .608 for these tests.
The first one is at straight up degrees. The second is -4 from suggested. Also, note the ignition timing...I wish the simulator would let you pick a better combustion chamber. They give you 3 to choose from from each (flat, wedge and a Hemi/Pentroof) The ignition timing setting is on auto in the Sim. Your results obviously varied. I entered the flow numbers at each point of lift off the TFS spec. Spec'd a high performance open plenum manifold with a 1000cfm throttle.

The last one is advanced 4 degrees. Look at the meat in the middle. That's got street car written all over it.

Looks like this page is reversing the order of the pics as I post them. Highest number is -4, middle number is 0 and lowest peak is +4, but the middle of the power is the best at +4, by far.


Click to expand...
Wouldnt advancing or regarding the cam just change where the car makes power and not necessarily how much power The car makes?
 
S

Shawn_Mc

Member
Oct 1, 2021
40
12
18
Anahiem
Oct 16, 2021
#55
  • Oct 16, 2021
  • #55
Cclaro said:
Wouldnt advancing or regarding the cam just change where the car makes power and not necessarily how much power The car makes?
Click to expand...

You can make a litte more peak, assuming the heads are capable of flowing the air, but for the most part, you're correct. Really what youre doing by adjusting the cam timing fore and aft is trying to find the meat of the power band in the most likely used portion of the RPM range. That's why I suggested advancing the timing a little for the street. Even if its a street strip car, if its a daily driver, it'll be more fun to drive with that beefy mid range than wringing it's neck for top end giggle time. This comes from a guy that built an N/A Bug engine (early 80's) that ran almost like a two stroke, made almost no power until 4500 rpm, then would literally rip the front wheels off the ground in 2nd gear, or smoke the tires to the 9000rpm shift point. That car was fun, wide open. But driving away from a red light with a cop behind you...trying to behave yourself, not a lot of fun. My Turbo Charged 355 in a 66' C10 was way more fun.
 
S

Shawn_Mc

Member
Oct 1, 2021
40
12
18
Anahiem
Oct 16, 2021
#56
  • Oct 16, 2021
  • #56
The ignition timing is a function of the flame front from the kernel hatching out to full cylinder diameter. With a flat top piston and a small chamber, you simply dont need that much timing. If youve got a nice small CC, that still flows on the exhaust stroke, some of those "fast burn fuels" are worth even more power with less timing. But if youve got a giant chamber, like that Dart I built, that has giant domes 48.5cc, It kept making power the more timing I threw at it. I stopped at 40. But ever time I added timing, the HC's would come down and the CO2 would go up (more complete burn)
 
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
First Prev 3 of 3
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

SN95 Desktop 363 Engine Combination - Looking for input
  • WhiteCobra95
  • Sep 8, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
11
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Oct 6, 2025
Habu135
Which one of these 3 intakes make the most sense for my 331 combo
  • from6to8
  • Jul 25, 2024
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Replies
7
Views
2K
1994 - 1995 Specific Tech Jul 26, 2024
AeroCoupe
Drivetrain 83’ Glx convertible C5 Trans help!
  • JacksonJared2113
  • Dec 25, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
2
Views
354
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Dec 26, 2025
JacksonJared2113
Place to Avoid: Jamison Auto Group in Gulfport, MS
  • D Durden
  • Oct 20, 2025
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • 2 3
Replies
45
Views
2K
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Feb 4, 2026
nickyb
W
Blue smoke..
  • Wicked_Rpm
  • Aug 11, 2024
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
1
Views
478
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- Aug 14, 2024
weendoggy
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?