• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech

explain head cc`s

  • Thread starter Thread starter dwhiskie
  • Start date Start date Oct 19, 2004
D

dwhiskie

New Member
Sep 18, 2004
183
0
0
Oct 19, 2004
#1
  • Oct 19, 2004
  • #1
I believe the 58,60,61 ect is the chamber size but dont understand,is the smaller the chamber = more compression or does this have anything to do with the compression? Im lookink to get a new set of heads but want to understand this before I do thanks for any input
 

5.0Droptop

...all those nights we shared, and you're a dude??
Special Agent Mukity-Muck Whats in Charge Round Here
May 15, 2002
1,785
1,130
233
Indiana
Oct 19, 2004
#2
  • Oct 19, 2004
  • #2
dwhiskie said:
I believe the 58,60,61 ect is the chamber size but dont understand,is the smaller the chamber = more compression or does this have anything to do with the compression? Im lookink to get a new set of heads but want to understand this before I do thanks for any input
Click to expand...

the smaller the chamber the higher the compression will be. the reason is that the air has to compress into a smaller area ie. 58cc. make the chamber bigger ie 64cc and the air has more room so the compression is less. hope this helps.
 

ponycar17

Founding Member
Nov 17, 2001
1,367
4
38
Upstate South Carolina
Oct 19, 2004
#3
  • Oct 19, 2004
  • #3
The CCs are a measure of the amount of cubic centimeters of volume you can hold in a head's combustion chamber... Higher CC numbers will yield lower compression. You calculate compression roughly by the volume in a cylinder after a piston has reached top dead center compared to the volume with the piston at bottom dead center. Lower CC numbers will give you a higher compression ratio. Volume of the piston's displacement, the gap around the piston down to the rings, and head gasket thickness all play a part in calculating compression precisely...

For instance, a dished piston yields a higher compressed volume after the piston reaches top dead center, so therefore, it yields a lower compression ratio. Dome pistons yield a higher compression ratio for the opposite reason...
 
8

87'GTstang

New Member
Feb 16, 2004
1,025
0
0
Oct 19, 2004
#4
  • Oct 19, 2004
  • #4
Basically it is space that air can be compressed into. If you have a specific volume of air you compress on every compression stroke then x amount of power is your result. However if you increase even more air (oxygen) in the same amount of given space, then more fuel will be delivered and by law, you will have a bigger explosion which creates more power. By downsizing the combustion chamber size, this is in a round-about way a simulation of this effect. You have in reality the same amount of oxygen but in a smaller amount of space, the comustion chamber pressure right before ignition (or at TDC) will actually be greater than before because it is in a tighter space (aka, higher compression). Compression is exactly what the word sounds like it is, the whole process is trying to cram as much air into a given amount of space. It is a little complicated to explain perfectly but if you can picture it in your head, it is just one of those things you get sometimes. There are limitations to how low you can go and too much compression can harm your engine. Basically it depends what you are using the engine for, but I would suggest to not exceed 10:1 final compression because pump gas might not support it.

Hope this helps a bit.
 
D

dwhiskie

New Member
Sep 18, 2004
183
0
0
Oct 20, 2004
#5
  • Oct 20, 2004
  • #5
Im currently running I believe are 58cc iron heads and compression ratio is around 11.3-1-pistons are flat top 10.5-1.I plan to change heads to the T/FTW and am not sure what cc I should go with?? I want to get the compression closer to 10.-1.Any suggestions?
 
D

dwhiskie

New Member
Sep 18, 2004
183
0
0
Oct 20, 2004
#6
  • Oct 20, 2004
  • #6
tt
 

speedracer238

New Member
Sep 18, 2003
141
0
0
Clawson, MI
Oct 20, 2004
#7
  • Oct 20, 2004
  • #7
Is it possible to run t/f twisterd wedge heads with flat top pistons?? that sounds like it has p/v clearance problems written all over it
 
D

dwhiskie

New Member
Sep 18, 2004
183
0
0
Oct 20, 2004
#8
  • Oct 20, 2004
  • #8
The pistons have been notched for valve relief
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

H
Forced Induction On3 Turbo Kit- Parts list NEEDED - 302 Stock Motor
  • Hirothecool1
  • Feb 27, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2
Replies
21
Views
1K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Mar 7, 2026
slow84lx
S
S
Fuel ‘88 GT Runs Rich Cold — Fixes Itself When I Unplug Sensors (ECT, MAF, O2, etc.)
  • Sufarry
  • Nov 6, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
12
Views
895
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Nov 9, 2025
Mustang5L5
Resolved Fixing a GT40P Valvetrain nightmare
  • foxbodyclark
  • May 21, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
7
Views
1K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech May 24, 2025
limp
9
Milton Questions, 351 swap newedge
  • 996stang
  • Jul 20, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
1
Views
226
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jan 25, 2026
Killer351w
K
Progress Thread Progress Thread- From6to8's 95 GT/Saleen Supercharged 331 install
  • from6to8
  • Mar 22, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
24
Views
982
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- May 6, 2026
from6to8
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?