Fastest NA 4.6 2V mustang

02bluegtstang · Oct 19, 2006

Whos got the best times and what mods do you have?

Wondering what my cars potential is since I am taking the NA route. (im planning on getting an 04 cobra in a year or so)

DropTopPony · Oct 19, 2006

That would be KenB, as far as i know he's still the fastest NA 2V @10.8 with 360rwhp
p&p'd head/mph cams/fox lake intake and flat top pistons...
2V NA high HP is hard to get and very expensive.

02bluegtstang · Oct 19, 2006

whats a good reliable setup that will give good power and good 1/4 times....im planning on doing:
-TB and plenum
-Catback
-X-pipe
-Short Shifter
-Headers
-Gears
-Drag Radials for track
-Tune after everything is in

What kind of hp/tq will that setup give me? What kind of 1/4? Does anyone have this setup? Im hoping mid-low 13s...

Dragstr05 · Oct 19, 2006

The fastest N/A 2v likely holds that title due to their suspension setup. If you were to do a full engine build and were very carefull with your block and head setup/combo, you could make pretty decent power with a 4.6. A good build with the right suspension could make these cars very quick, they just need the right things.

Yellow2002GT · Oct 19, 2006

With what you want......get UCA's/LCA's rear seat delete and aluminum d/s you could see high 12,s pretty easy!

"ED"

Yellow2002GT · Oct 19, 2006

With what you want......get UCA's/LCA's rear seat delete and aluminum d/s you could see high 12,s pretty easy!

"ED"

Red2000GT · Oct 19, 2006

I'd say low 13's should be easy.not high 12's,with those mods. Unless you gut the car then 12's easy. You'd need to add cams at least and maybe p&p heads on a "street" car (still has all power accessories&interior&functioning stereo) to hit 12's.

san~man · Oct 19, 2006

02bluegtstang said:
Whos got the best times and what mods do you have?

Wondering what my cars potential is since I am taking the NA route. (im planning on getting an 04 cobra in a year or so)

You have to be more specific on that.....stock as in what? Displacement? Stock heads/cams? etc etc.

BlackenedSVT · Oct 19, 2006

See Bill Putnam
12.15 @ 110.6 (N/A)

streetstang03 · Oct 19, 2006

SteedaGTJ22 said:
See Bill Putnam
12.15 @ 110.6 (N/A)

wrong. KenB beat that a while ago...

BlackenedSVT · Oct 19, 2006

streetstang03 said:
wrong. KenB beat that a while ago...

really?? what was his time? That 10.8?

jasonh_86 · Oct 20, 2006

Correction..

VT Engines.. 9.20 @ 146.30

http://forums.stangnet.com/showthread.php?t=663479

DocG · Oct 20, 2006

Not to sound like an idiot, but is that car in the VT video a 4.6 2v??

RandyStinchcomb · Oct 20, 2006

DocG2828 said:
Not to sound like an idiot, but is that car in the VT video a 4.6 2v??

no, it is not a SOHC but a 5.4 DOHC

DocG · Oct 20, 2006

RandyStinchcomb said:
no, it is not a SOHC but a 5.4 DOHC

I wondered why someone would bother to drop a 4.6 2v in a Foxbody.

drew_shipley · Oct 20, 2006

02bluegtstang said:
whats a good reliable setup that will give good power and good 1/4 times....im planning on doing:
-TB and plenum
-Catback
-X-pipe
-Short Shifter
-Headers
-Gears
-Drag Radials for track
-Tune after everything is in

What kind of hp/tq will that setup give me? What kind of 1/4? Does anyone have this setup? Im hoping mid-low 13s...

With 4.10s, DRs, LTs, and an O/R Mid you should be able to get into the low 13s.

DropTopPony · Oct 20, 2006

jasonh_86 said:
Correction..

VT Engines.. 9.20 @ 146.30

http://forums.stangnet.com/showthread.php?t=663479

4V noob

RandyStinchcomb · Oct 20, 2006

DocG2828 said:
I wondered why someone would bother to drop a 4.6 2v in a Foxbody.

Fox body's are @500lbs lighter then the SN95's for one, 2 because if Im not mistaken ,the cars chassis and suspension was already done and its a DOHC not a SOHC

DocG · Oct 20, 2006

Yeah, but you said it was a 5.4. All I was saying was based on Jason's post, I thought maybe the VT car was a 4.6....and I wouldn't have thought transplanting a 2v 4.6 into a fox was the best way to get power.

So the 5.4 isn't just a bored out 4.6....its a whole different engine right? Why do I feel so confused all of a sudden.

DropTopPony · Oct 21, 2006

DocG2828 said:
Yeah, but you said it was a 5.4. All I was saying was based on Jason's post, I thought maybe the VT car was a 4.6....and I wouldn't have thought transplanting a 2v 4.6 into a fox was the best way to get power.

So the 5.4 isn't just a bored out 4.6....its a whole different engine right? Why do I feel so confused all of a sudden.

Yes the 5.4 is a Physically larger block then the 4.6 not just bored or stroked.

Fastest NA 4.6 2V mustang

Banned

Noob Slayer

Banned

New Member

New Member

New Member

O-G

Active Member

unModerator

Active Member

I

5th graders > me. They're not bant

New Member

5th graders > me. They're not bant

New Member

Noob Slayer

New Member

5th graders > me. They're not bant

Noob Slayer

Similar threads

Privacy & Transparency

Privacy & Transparency