• Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-

Finally got dyno tuned!!!!

  • Thread starter Thread starter 1low03gt
  • Start date Start date Jun 1, 2006
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last

1low03gt

20+ Year Stangneter
May 24, 2004
708
11
38
Cold Hell,Ontario,Canada!!
Jun 1, 2006
#1
  • Jun 1, 2006
  • #1
Finally got my sled tuned this past week.For the mods i have,i'm very impressed.In stock form,she dyno'd 230 hp,and 275/280 ft- lbs of torque when she had 1500 kilometers on her.
Now,with VT stage II cams,comp cam valve springs,with the stock unported heads,ported/hogged upper plenum,with stock throttle body,intake spacer,K&N,Mac h pipe,welded in 2 1/2 flowmaster 40's,and a SCT tune by a good body of mine,she pulled 285.9 hp,and 342.6 ft lbs of torque .There is more,but it was a muggy,hot day.I like to do a few more bolt ons,and re do it again.Im on the quest to 300 hp n/a.We will see.
Here is the graph.F.Y.I...the rpm's are out a little on the print out. And yes,this was on a loaded dyno.
 

jasonh_86

I
May 20, 2005
1,156
2
48
Arkansas
Jun 1, 2006
#2
  • Jun 1, 2006
  • #2
Nice numbers man!!

I've got a set of VT Stage 2's and Manley springs on the way.. I've got all bolt-ons except for LT's, so i'm hoping for the 285rwhp area as well
 

DisposableHero

Member
Oct 4, 2004
71
0
6
Jun 1, 2006
#3
  • Jun 1, 2006
  • #3
wow thats a lot of torque
 

jasonh_86

I
May 20, 2005
1,156
2
48
Arkansas
Jun 1, 2006
#4
  • Jun 1, 2006
  • #4
That's what i was thinking .. but I didn't want to say anything, because i'm not calling and didn't want to sound stupid haha
 

DropTopPony

Noob Slayer
Founding Member
Aug 13, 2002
2,570
3
48
south jersey
Jun 1, 2006
#5
  • Jun 1, 2006
  • #5
damn tq monster...nice #'s....they always seem to be higher in Canada
 

helty

some Ukrainian's enjoying a handjob via my credit
Mar 30, 2005
1,461
1
39
Baltimore, MD
Jun 1, 2006
#6
  • Jun 1, 2006
  • #6
 

TweekedGT

New Member
Jul 22, 2004
1,274
0
0
Alberta
Jun 1, 2006
#7
  • Jun 1, 2006
  • #7
HP sounds alright but torque is definitely bogus. With my VT stage 2's on a Mustang dyno with full exhaust and PI heads, cams, intake, and CAI, I only put down 275HP and 302 Torque. I don't think the old 340+ is right. Just my .02 though.
 
M

Mustanggt108

New Member
Sep 23, 2005
221
0
0
Jun 1, 2006
#8
  • Jun 1, 2006
  • #8
those are some great numbers i wish my car was putting down that much Right now
 

csledd

Official Ovary Punching Member
Founding Member
Aug 18, 2001
1,115
1
0
Paducah, KY
Jun 1, 2006
#9
  • Jun 1, 2006
  • #9
wtf torque beast.. with my vt stage 2's and all the bolt ons I only had 310 rwtq.. i gained 4 from the cams. so yeah that's crazy. are those numbers SAE corrected? since you said it was hot it could be adding a ton, I dunno.
 
C

CatmanJJ

Captain Tangnet
20+ Year Stangneter
Feb 5, 2002
4,379
1
68
Maryland
Jun 2, 2006
#10
  • Jun 2, 2006
  • #10
That's awesome, gotta low dem cams.
 

1low03gt

20+ Year Stangneter
May 24, 2004
708
11
38
Cold Hell,Ontario,Canada!!
Jun 2, 2006
#11
  • Jun 2, 2006
  • #11
Thanks guys!!!

Hey some of you can call B.S on the torque all you want.The graph is there.
This car has been a freak from the day i got her off the dealership parking lot. She's been strong from the get go.
And i wouldn't be posting b.s,believe me,and ain't no punk kid looking for attention(no offence to anyone).I'm married,and have a kid,and am of the age above 30. So got better things to do.
Anyways back to topic.
The torque caught us of guard,didn't expect that at all.
First pull was 280.0 and 337.8 ft-lbs.We were like,oh *****!!!
Did a little more tweeking,then second pull was 283.6 hp and 341.2 ft-lbs. We looked at each other and went
The third pull he did a few more adjustsments,and she spat out 285.9 and 342.6 ft-lbs.We again klokked at each other and went .
 
G

GT02MG

New Member
Dec 11, 2004
49
0
0
MD
Jun 2, 2006
#12
  • Jun 2, 2006
  • #12
Man I need some more mods
 
C

CobraSVT123

New Member
May 25, 2006
2
0
1
Jun 2, 2006
#13
  • Jun 2, 2006
  • #13
cool man!!
 

hotmustang331

Active Member
Apr 29, 2004
2,967
3
48
Bastrop,TX
Jun 2, 2006
#14
  • Jun 2, 2006
  • #14
Go to a different dyno, unfortunatly that ones not calibrated correctly. I have seen this before, and when people go to a regular dynojet, the #s straighten right up.

Look at it, your power is dropping FAST @6K...you should be darn near flatlining @ 6K.
According to the chart you would have lost 35RWHP from 5K-6K. So let me ask you, do you feel a 35HP loss? And does the car feel the strongest @ only 5K? You WILL feel a BIG loss if its loosing that much power by 6K.

Next is the troque...stock headed 2Vs wont put down that much torque. Reason being is that if it made THAT much torque...the cars power would have to be on a SERIOUS decline just past the torque peak to make 285 (or around that, what a 2V can make). But the cams are designed to HOLD the power to a higher RPM. So with 345 TQ, that would be a good 360+ RWHP being N/A and a 2V with no VVT.

Sorry man , but still for being jacked and on that type of dyno...those are some awsome #s But apparently it is tuned to a good A/F, so throw it on a local dyno jet and see what happens.
 

VTEngines

New Member
Jan 29, 2003
180
0
0
Michigan
Jun 2, 2006
#15
  • Jun 2, 2006
  • #15
1low03gt said:
Thanks guys!!!

Hey some of you can call B.S on the torque all you want.The graph is there.
This car has been a freak from the day i got her off the dealership parking lot. She's been strong from the get go.
And i wouldn't be posting b.s,believe me,and ain't no punk kid looking for attention(no offence to anyone).I'm married,and have a kid,and am of the age above 30. So got better things to do.
Anyways back to topic.
The torque caught us of guard,didn't expect that at all.
First pull was 280.0 and 337.8 ft-lbs.We were like,oh *****!!!
Did a little more tweeking,then second pull was 283.6 hp and 341.2 ft-lbs. We looked at each other and went
The third pull he did a few more adjustsments,and she spat out 285.9 and 342.6 ft-lbs.We again klokked at each other and went .
Click to expand...

Where was that done at?
 

ADRENLN

Active Member
Apr 16, 2003
2,342
3
49
NJ
Jun 3, 2006
#16
  • Jun 3, 2006
  • #16
i do believe that some gts come out stronger then others. my buddys gt is stronger than mine was when i was stock. no way there was that kind of difference though. nice numbers either way. i also say somthing is wrong with the rwtq #.

that is way stronger then everyone elses. the type of difference that you would get out of my car and get into yours and say " damn this car is way stronger" i dont think that would be the case.
 

blackink00

I missed a shift & stole Curt's money.
Mar 30, 2005
545
0
0
Tempe, AZ
Jun 3, 2006
#17
  • Jun 3, 2006
  • #17
torque for teh win. now i have one of the biggest torque monsters here. its fun
 
P

Pennywise2

Banned
May 16, 2006
1,379
1
0
Jun 3, 2006
#18
  • Jun 3, 2006
  • #18
Congrats great numbers!
 

merc123

Active Member
Jan 27, 2003
420
2
39
North GA
Jun 3, 2006
#19
  • Jun 3, 2006
  • #19
ADRENLN said:
my buddys gt is stronger than mine was when i was stock.
Click to expand...

It was drivers
 

ADRENLN

Active Member
Apr 16, 2003
2,342
3
49
NJ
Jun 3, 2006
#20
  • Jun 3, 2006
  • #20
could have been except it was me driving both of them.
 
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

W
347 EFI Low Power
  • w_jake17
  • Jul 8, 2022
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2 3 4
Replies
75
Views
10K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jul 20, 2022
TOOLOW91
P
4 Hole Bosch Injectors max HP and Tune -4.6 PI
  • Png1978
  • Jul 23, 2022
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Replies
1
Views
3K
SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech Aug 10, 2022
Chipss36
Fox Am I The Only One Shocked By My Dyno Results?
  • Vinnyc1487
  • Sep 8, 2021
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
10
Views
2K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Sep 13, 2021
revhead347
Fresh Dyno Tune - Voodoo Racing
  • White Wolf
  • Feb 19, 2020
  • 2005 - 2014 Specific V6 Tech
Replies
17
Views
4K
2005 - 2014 Specific V6 Tech Mar 18, 2020
Ponyboy1975
  • Locked
“Doing stuff the wrong way for the right reasons”: A related stupid story.
  • CarMichael Angelo
  • Apr 26, 2020
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
7
Views
4K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Apr 27, 2020
a91what
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?