• Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech

flat tops and stock head compression....

  • Thread starter Thread starter Stang_1973
  • Start date Start date Nov 5, 2004

Stang_1973

Founding Member
Jul 13, 2001
565
9
38
San Antonio, Tx.
Nov 5, 2004
#1
  • Nov 5, 2004
  • #1
Well the first time I had my engine done, the mechanic was able to obtain flat top pistons for me. They were forged but he didn't give me a brand name or other info. So My question is What kind of compression do Forged flat top pistons usually render? I have stock heads but i dont know what size combustion chambers.
 

66P51GT

New Member
Nov 7, 2003
721
1
0
Cerritos, CA
Nov 5, 2004
#2
  • Nov 5, 2004
  • #2
Need more specifics such as compression height, deck height, rod length, stroke, bore, gasket thickness, valve relief size in pistons, head combustion chamber size. Without these, you are just guessing.

Using the following specs:
Bore 4.040
Stroke 3.00
Deck 8.206
Rod Length 5.090
Pin Height 1.600
Head Gasket Size 4.100
Compressed Head Gasket Height 0.041
Piston Valve Relief Volume 5.000

Head Volume: 56.000
Compression: 9.6

Head Volume: 58.000
Compression: 9.4

Head Volume: 60.000
Compression: 9.2

Head Volume: 62.000
Compression: 9.0

Head Volume: 64.000
Compression: 8.8
 

brianj5600

Active Member
Sep 19, 2003
1,964
2
39
Middle TN
Nov 5, 2004
#3
  • Nov 5, 2004
  • #3
How much would 0 decking it change compression?
 

66P51GT

New Member
Nov 7, 2003
721
1
0
Cerritos, CA
Nov 5, 2004
#4
  • Nov 5, 2004
  • #4
~4 tenths
so if it was originally 9.0:1 it would be 9.4:1

This is changing the deck height from 8.206 to 8.190. Again, this is using stock components which he is not. The .040 oversized pistions could have a different compression height. Best thing to do is mock it up and measure.
 

HistoricMustang

Active Member
Apr 11, 2003
2,359
0
46
Confederate States of America
Nov 5, 2004
#5
  • Nov 5, 2004
  • #5
I am guessing if they were forged then they were 10.5 to 1 but that is a guess based on the limited information. Believe the HiPo was forged 10.5 to 1 and that is what I run in my ride and they were made by TRW.

HistoricMustang
www.historicmustang.com
 

Stang_1973

Founding Member
Jul 13, 2001
565
9
38
San Antonio, Tx.
Nov 5, 2004
#6
  • Nov 5, 2004
  • #6
Thanks guys.. reason I was asking cause as you see in my sig. I want to get the energizer cam from Crane cams. Their 272 series cam recommends 8.7 Comp. I want to know if there is a chance that i would be under that with my flat tops and stock heads. I eventually plan on getting some GT-40 heads but it will be a while before I can.
 

jeffnoel

Founding Member
Aug 31, 2002
1,638
5
37
Clovis, CA
Nov 6, 2004
#7
  • Nov 6, 2004
  • #7
I'm going to assume that the original engine was the 302 2V. If so your heads have a compression chamber volume of 58.2 and with stock dished pistons had a compression ratio of 8.0. So going to the flattops probably bumped it into the 8.5-9.0 range.
 
D

D.Hearne

New Member
Sep 29, 2000
11,730
6
0
south louisiana
Nov 6, 2004
#8
  • Nov 6, 2004
  • #8
HistoricMustang said:
Believe the HiPo was forged 10.5 to 1

HistoricMustang
www.historicmustang.com
Click to expand...
Aw, come on now Historic, I know you know your history better than that The Hi-po's had cast pistons.
 
D

D.Hearne

New Member
Sep 29, 2000
11,730
6
0
south louisiana
Nov 6, 2004
#9
  • Nov 6, 2004
  • #9
66P51GT said:
Need more specifics such as compression height, deck height, rod length, stroke, bore, gasket thickness, valve relief size in pistons, head combustion chamber size. Without these, you are just guessing.

Using the following specs:
Bore 4.040
Stroke 3.00
Deck 8.206
Rod Length 5.090
Pin Height 1.600
Head Gasket Size 4.100
Compressed Head Gasket Height 0.041
Piston Valve Relief Volume 5.000

Head Volume: 56.000
Compression: 9.6

Head Volume: 58.000
Compression: 9.4

Head Volume: 60.000
Compression: 9.2

Head Volume: 62.000
Compression: 9.0

Head Volume: 64.000
Compression: 8.8
Click to expand...
You've hit the nail on the head Most guys just assume they've got a certain comp ratio, when chances are it could be a full point less, depending on the comp height of the pistons they bought. Compression height on 302 flat tops varies up to .030, making piston selection more involved than just grabbing the first thing off the shelf.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Engine Forged flat top pistons from 5.0 fit a 351 build?
  • PonyGTrider
  • May 22, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
17
Views
1K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Feb 1, 2026
PonyGTrider
Fox Xtremely high fuel consumption
  • PonyGTrider
  • Apr 11, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 9 10 11
Replies
213
Views
5K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- May 9, 2026
PonyGTrider
Engine Looking for suggestions and or ideas
  • PonyGTrider
  • Aug 25, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
17
Views
446
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Sep 7, 2026
PonyGTrider
9
Milton Questions, 351 swap newedge
  • 996stang
  • Jul 20, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
1
Views
255
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jan 25, 2026
Killer351w
K
N
New Edge 3.8L Forged Internals
  • NtheGAME
  • Jun 1, 2025
  • SN95 V6 Mustang Tech
Replies
1
Views
822
SN95 V6 Mustang Tech Jun 3, 2025
Noobz347
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?