• Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-

Progress Thread Flghtmstr1's 700 Rwhp Build

  • Thread starter Thread starter Flghtmstr1
  • Start date Start date Sep 3, 2010
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
First Prev 5 of 5

Flghtmstr1

Member
Mar 31, 2005
572
4
19
Springfield, PA
Apr 29, 2013
#81
  • Apr 29, 2013
  • #81
It has been an arduous, long, slow process (with a new wife and new house pushing the Mustang to the back burner), but here are some updates.

I finally got it on the dyno a couple of weeks ago, and it put down 655 ft-lbs of torque at around 2500 rpm (as soon as the throttle hit the floor) on its first pull. It was making about 19.5 psi of boost on 93 octane, which is pushing it. We splashed some VP 110 octane into the tank for safety, and Jon set the rev limiter higher for a max power pull.

Alas, it only made 550 rwhp at 5500 rpm. Jon cut the pull off early, as he saw the power and torque dropping dramatically, and we all heard a pronounced change in engine noise. As it turns out, the valves floated around 4150 rpm, as you can see by the inflection point in the hp and torque curves:



Needless to say, I was bummed, almost to the point of denial. I drove it home, and the first thing I did was a leakdown test. No cylinder had any measurable leakdown, so I dodged a bullet there. I then pulled the valve covers, and called Modular Head Shop as I was supposed to received Stage 3 valve springs with my heads. After consulting with Jordan, we determined that they inadvertently used Stage 2 valve springs when building my heads! They handled the situation admirably, however, and sent me the correct valve springs with no questions asked and no out-of-pocket expenses for me.

Of course, actually installing the new valve springs was up to me. I don't know how many of you have swapped valve springs with the engine in the car, but it was a bitch. It took about 6 hours with a helper.

The car then sat for a few weeks, until yesterday when I finally had some time to put things back together again.

I got her buttoned up, and turned the key. It lit off for a few revs, then died with a loud grinding noise. My wife, who was watching the engine bay for leaks / smoke / fire, nearly jumped out of her skin lol. After racking my brain for a few moments, I realized the horrible truth:

I left a rag in the intake! With a pit in my stomach, I tore into the Mustang again. I eventually reached the TVS's gaping intake, and found some tattered rag fragments to confirm my worst fears. The engine was seized at this point.

Thinking it was the only way to potentially salvage my engine / supercharger, I took the drain plug out of the blower, took the snout off, and inspected the gears that keep both rotors meshed. The driver's side gear had three dowels on it that the snout engages to drive the supercharger. A lightbulb went off in my head, and I dug around for a tool I had used to change my Miata's timing belt. As it turns out, this tool had two holes drilled in it that were exactly the same distance apart as two of the three dowels on the TVS gear! I placed the tool on the dowels, grabbed some gloves, and pulled on the tool counter-clockwise to attempt to untangle the rag from the TVS's lobes. After what I thought to be more than enough force, the blower turned backwards just enough to expose a large rag fragment. To make a long story short, I was able to use a combination of my fingers, my wife's (thinner) fingers, an intentionally blunted 90 degree pick, and a flexible claw tool, to extract all rag remnants from the supercharger. When it finally spun freely (more-or-less), I put everything back together, and fired the Mustang up again. It ran! I immediately took it out on the nearest highway to confirm it still made boost, and amazingly, it did.

Those TVS blowers are tough sons of bitches. I can't believe it wasn't damaged, but all seems to be well. Next step is to put it back on the dyno and see how much it makes on a clean pull. Then, it's off to Cecil!
 
Reactions: tank_567

Noobz347

Stangnet Facilities Maint Tech... Er... Janitor
Admin Dude
Jan 4, 1985
43,107
21,284
234
Box behind Walmart
Apr 29, 2013
#82
  • Apr 29, 2013
  • #82
Holy f+ock-o+u man. You got lucky as hell. I would never have thought a screw type blower could survive such a thing. Super glad that it did and worked out for you though.
 

usaf_branham

15 Year Member
Oct 30, 2008
927
134
84
Boston
Apr 29, 2013
#83
  • Apr 29, 2013
  • #83
wow.... the car gods were smiling on you brother.
 

Flghtmstr1

Member
Mar 31, 2005
572
4
19
Springfield, PA
Apr 29, 2013
#84
  • Apr 29, 2013
  • #84
You're not kidding. I thought it was a goner for sure. I wouldn't be surprised if this incident shortened its life, but I'm sure I'll be looking to get something even bigger down the road
 

SRT Handz

I tripped & fell down and cut myself & got blood
Oct 10, 2004
941
23
19
La Mirada, CA
May 1, 2013
#85
  • May 1, 2013
  • #85
My toes curled when i read the stuff about realizing that you left the rag in the engine.
 

Flghtmstr1

Member
Mar 31, 2005
572
4
19
Springfield, PA
May 1, 2013
#86
  • May 1, 2013
  • #86
I don't think the engine had a chance to fully light off before the rag gummed up the works. Therefore, the forces were lower. Also, the supercharger drive belt would have slipped to "ease" the stoppage, further cushioning the blow. Still, it was pretty violent.
 

Gearbanger 101

Straight Outta Locash
20+ Year Stangneter
Aug 10, 2002
9,457
1,377
234
Ontario, Canada
May 1, 2013
#87
  • May 1, 2013
  • #87
could have been worse....could have been a wrench.
 

Clair Smith

Active Member
Apr 4, 2012
186
13
29
Norfolk Va
May 2, 2013
#88
  • May 2, 2013
  • #88
Awesome build, holy pucker moment with the rag! Glad it worked out though

Sent from my MB886 using Tapatalk 2
 

tank_567

Active Member
Mar 19, 2007
731
26
29
Raleigh, Nc
May 2, 2013
#89
  • May 2, 2013
  • #89
Crazy story! Happy to hear all is well, hope to see new numbers soon.
 

sneaky98gt

10 Year Member
Apr 23, 2008
2,387
144
114
NC State University
May 2, 2013
#90
  • May 2, 2013
  • #90
Yea, looking forward to seeing new numbers.

That being said, don't get all bummed out if the dyno numbers aren't what you want them to be. Automatics don't always tell the whole story on a dyno. Use the track to see the real performance gain. My car still only makes about '340' rwhp on the dyno, but my last time out at the track, it was trapping just shy of 120 mph at 3600 pounds. Do the math, and that comes out to around 510 hp at the motor, which comes to around 425 rwhp on a manual car that shows all of it on the dyno. WAAAY more than what my car does on the dyno.

Also, how are you getting a pull started that low in the RPM? Every time I've dynoed, the converter would unlock if you went WOT less than 3500ish RPM.
 
Reactions: tank_567

Flghtmstr1

Member
Mar 31, 2005
572
4
19
Springfield, PA
May 14, 2013
#91
  • May 14, 2013
  • #91
Sneaky,

I appreciate that the dyno results might not be what I'm hoping for, but I'm okay with that. My goal all along has been to build a fun, daily-drivable monster that can blend in with rush hour traffic yet unleash hell when you put the right pedal down. From the disapproving looks I've received from hybrid drivers and expletives screamed by those who asked for joyscare rides, I think I succeeded

Besides, it has already exceeded my expectations with regards to torque. If I can get a clean pull to 6500 rpm, it'll surely be in excess of 600 rwhp.

I do agree that your trap speed sounds really high for 340 rwhp. With the Tork Tech MP112 kit, I was only trapping 113 with 386 rwhp through my stock 4R70W. I'm not sure the trans is the culprit, however. I would just chalk it up to different dynos, different days, and different tuners. Clearly, your car is running well, and that's all that really matters.

As for the low-rpm dyno pull, Jon has a special "dyno mode" tune that locks the trans in 3rd with the torque converter locking up at a low wheel speed (maybe 15-20 mph).
 

Flghtmstr1

Member
Mar 31, 2005
572
4
19
Springfield, PA
Nov 22, 2015
#92
  • Nov 22, 2015
  • #92
A long-overdue update: the car has been re-dynoed and run at the track. To make a long story short, the dyno was still a mixed bag, as even with the new valve springs, the valves still floated (albeit at a higher rpm). The car put down 600 rwhp and 640 rwtq, but this time at only 15 psi. The valves floated at 6000 rpm, so there should still be a lot of power in this combo if I can figure out what's going on.

At the track, though, the car is running great. The tune is set to shift at 5800 rpm, thereby bypassing the valve float issue. I made the first two passes yesterday, and the car really ripped:





This is at full street weight and trim, with full interior, spare, jack, swaybar attached, street tires, and full tank of 93 octane. I literally drove the car to the track, pulled up to the line, did my burnout, and went for it.
 
Last edited: Nov 23, 2015

skyline247

Advanced Member
Jul 28, 2014
816
225
73
Cincinnati, OH
Nov 23, 2015
#93
  • Nov 23, 2015
  • #93
Nice! [emoji106]

It sounds like you need stiffer valve springs. It will be interesting to see how much farther it can go once the valve float is resolved.

Sent from my Nexus 6 using Tapatalk
 

mogs01gt

Founding Member
Jul 22, 2002
3,113
30
119
Ohio
Nov 23, 2015
#94
  • Nov 23, 2015
  • #94
nice times!!

question, why didnt you opt for the Trickflow heads?
 

Flghtmstr1

Member
Mar 31, 2005
572
4
19
Springfield, PA
Jan 31, 2016
#95
  • Jan 31, 2016
  • #95
mogs01gt said:
nice times!!

question, why didnt you opt for the Trickflow heads?
Click to expand...

They didn't exist when this build started. If I were to do it all over again, I might. Then again, I might not, as I wanted to see what factory heads would do, and the Trickflows are twice the price.
 
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
First Prev 5 of 5
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Progress Thread Progress Thread- From6to8's 95 GT/Saleen Supercharged 331 install
  • from6to8
  • Mar 22, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
24
Views
934
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- May 6, 2026
from6to8
J
Bad Vibration
  • jefffletch47
  • Feb 12, 2026
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
7
Views
290
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- Jun 2, 2026
dgrinnan
D
A
Fuel Capable fuel system for +600hp
  • Avia.tuned
  • Feb 24, 2026
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Replies
1
Views
104
SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech Feb 24, 2026
squeak93
B
Acceleration Vibration
  • Blown02svt
  • Dec 31, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
13
Views
639
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jan 5, 2026
General karthief
B
Where to go from here on my build…
  • B0udreaux
  • Jul 14, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
8
Views
196
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jul 18, 2026
AeroCoupe
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?