• Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech

Flowmaster vs Magnaflow mufflers

  • Thread starter Thread starter SadbutTrue
  • Start date Start date Sep 17, 2008
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Next
First Prev 2 of 5 Next Last

Shakin66

Founding Member
Jan 19, 2001
628
1
19
Waycross, Ga / Lake James, NC
Sep 19, 2008
#21
  • Sep 19, 2008
  • #21
I cant say which is "better" as I have never had a flowmaster system but I have a Magnaflow system with an X pipe. I cant say enough about the sound and have even had a guy tell me he thought it was a new cobra pulling up behind him. I do believe though that the X over H is much better way to go. But thats just my .02
 
J

Jimmys66

Founding Member
Nov 28, 2001
419
0
0
Paw Paw MI
Sep 19, 2008
#22
  • Sep 19, 2008
  • #22
zookeeper said:
Not sure why all the hatred towards the 50-series Flowmasters. My wife's 427 'vette has them and it sounds perfect. Not too loud, not too tame, which it sounds like what you're after. I'd take them any day over Magnaflows, but to each his own...
Click to expand...


I agree. I started with Flo-Pros(flomaster knock offs) 12 years ago and hated them. 2 years ago I switched to a set of Magnaflows and it was better but the car just didn't sound quite right..........


I didn't like 40 series Flomasters because they were going to be to loud and every car I knew had them had drone issues.

This year I switched to 50 series Flowmasters. I was a little worried that I would neuter the sound of an over cammed 302, but the 50s are perfect. They have the right sound, no drone, just as loud as the magna's at idle and I can hold a conversation going down the road, barely.


The Magnas sound great on new cars with an x pipe, but the just sounded a little tinny with my h pipe.
 

SadbutTrue

Founding Member
May 1, 2002
2,390
4
49
Granada Hills, California
Sep 19, 2008
#23
  • Sep 19, 2008
  • #23
Rusty67 said:
Most people that like SlowMasters are the people that like them because they make the car sound a lot meaner then it is.
Click to expand...

pfft they're mufflers, until someone shows me a dyno where they compare the two back to back without changing a single other thing you'll never get me to buy that its even a double digit difference in horsepower. and my car can finally back up the flowmaster's bark, woot

Anyone else have (or want to make) some recordings of older cars with the Magnaflows or 50 series Flows (like I said, didn't think too much of them on my buddy's 455 buick but no reason not to keep an open mind if someone has a clip to listen to)?

Tim65GT said:
I installed the 2 1/2" Flowmaster system on mine behind shorty headers and and H pipe. I have it run all the way to the back throught the GT valance. They are not as loud as I thought they would be, but I installed a lot of sound deadening.

I had previously installed $1000 worth of stereo items, now sometimes I don't even turn it on, I just listen to the stereo exhaust.
Click to expand...

Not to hijack my own htread, but I may be asking you about how you installed that system. My next major project will probably taking the $1000/2000 W peak sound system out of my Cadillac and putting it into the Mustang (won't happen for a while)... need advice on sound deadening, ensuring the whole car doesn't just rattle to no end, getting an alternator that can power it, etc.
 

SadbutTrue

Founding Member
May 1, 2002
2,390
4
49
Granada Hills, California
Sep 19, 2008
#24
  • Sep 19, 2008
  • #24
zookeeper said:
Not sure why all the hatred towards the 50-series Flowmasters. My wife's 427 'vette has them and it sounds perfect. Not too loud, not too tame, which it sounds like what you're after. I'd take them any day over Magnaflows, but to each his own...
Click to expand...

Official request for sound clip of Vette here

Shakin66 said:
I cant say which is "better" as I have never had a flowmaster system but I have a Magnaflow system with an X pipe. I cant say enough about the sound and have even had a guy tell me he thought it was a new cobra pulling up behind him. I do believe though that the X over H is much better way to go. But thats just my .02
Click to expand...

Also, a clip of your car would be nice. I don't plan on swapping my pipes out though.. they're only a few years old and in fine shape. So the Hpipe will have to stay
 

iskwezm

10 Year Member
May 24, 2005
4,159
20
79
Rowland Heights,California
Sep 19, 2008
#25
  • Sep 19, 2008
  • #25
SadbutTrue said:
Anyone else have (or want to make) some recordings of older cars with the Magnaflows or 50 series Flows
Click to expand...
All trhe Ford clips on the Magnaflow site sound like a$$(sorry Brent). I am curious too
 

blown65

Founding Member
Jul 7, 1999
1,938
4
39
Queen Creek Arizona
Sep 19, 2008
#26
  • Sep 19, 2008
  • #26
SadbutTrue said:
pfft they're mufflers, until someone shows me a dyno where they compare the two back to back without changing a single other thing you'll never get me to buy that its even a double digit difference in horsepower. and my car can finally back up the flowmaster's bark, woot

Anyone else have (or want to make) some recordings of older cars with the Magnaflows or 50 series Flows (like I said, didn't think too much of them on my buddy's 455 buick but no reason not to keep an open mind if someone has a clip to listen to)?



Not to hijack my own htread, but I may be asking you about how you installed that system. My next major project will probably taking the $1000/2000 W peak sound system out of my Cadillac and putting it into the Mustang (won't happen for a while)... need advice on sound deadening, ensuring the whole car doesn't just rattle to no end, getting an alternator that can power it, etc.
Click to expand...


There have been test done, numerous times that show flowmasters hurt power, sometimes severely depending on the combination of things. Just like an x-pipe sometimes does more harm that good. On a light build though, I doubt much would be noticed. I know on my car, chambered mufflers is quite a difference in just seat of the pants and off throttle response. The Magnaflows def had more low end feel power wise than my chambered mufflers did. (this coming from someone that likes chambered mufflers sound better)
 

67Thunder

New Member
Jun 19, 2005
101
0
0
Vancouver, Canada
Sep 19, 2008
#27
  • Sep 19, 2008
  • #27
A couple videos;
I have the magnaflow 2 1/2" with X pipes and a mild 428;

YouTube - 428 cu FE in 67 Shelby Drive out

and revving up

YouTube - 428 cobra jet Shelby revving up
 
O

Oldskool

New Member
Feb 15, 2004
25
0
1
Sep 19, 2008
#28
  • Sep 19, 2008
  • #28
Dyno info

Here's a link to a Website with power and noise comparisons.

Muffler flow and dB comparison, Hooker Maxflow & Bassani Real Street? [Archive] - LS1TECH

Don
 

blown65

Founding Member
Jul 7, 1999
1,938
4
39
Queen Creek Arizona
Sep 19, 2008
#29
  • Sep 19, 2008
  • #29
Oldskool said:
Here's a link to a Website with power and noise comparisons.

Muffler flow and dB comparison, Hooker Maxflow & Bassani Real Street? [Archive] - LS1TECH

Don
Click to expand...

Thats not very relevant to our classics since it was on a notchback mustang, with more than likely with Catalytic converters.
 

hivewax

Member
Jan 1, 2006
233
0
17
Miami, FL
Sep 19, 2008
#30
  • Sep 19, 2008
  • #30
i have the MagnaFlow s/s 2.5" exhaust x-over connected to JBA Tri-Y's to a 289 stroked 347 w/AFR185's + Holley 670cfm Street Avenger producing around 450hp. idles betw/1000-1500rpm. 3 clips on YouTube channel:

YouTube - hivewax's Channel
 

hipo_p51

Member
Jun 13, 2008
199
2
19
Sep 19, 2008
#31
  • Sep 19, 2008
  • #31
I have some old two chamber flowmasters on my 66 fastback. bought them back in the mid 90s. they are still in great shape and the sound is great! my trick 331 just seems to love them. 6 to 7000rpm it sounds like the gates of hell are wide open! magnaflows are for girls.
 

Rusty67

20+ Year Stangneter
Dec 3, 2002
3,749
37
109
LA, CA
Sep 19, 2008
#32
  • Sep 19, 2008
  • #32
Rusty67 said:
Most people that like SlowMasters are the people that like them because they make the car sound a lot meaner then it is.
Click to expand...

hipo_p51 said:
I have some old two chamber flowmasters on my 66 fastback. bought them back in the mid 90s. they are still in great shape and the sound is great! my trick 331 just seems to love them. 6 to 7000rpm it sounds like the gates of hell are wide open! magnaflows are for girls.
Click to expand...

I rest my case.
 

hivewax

Member
Jan 1, 2006
233
0
17
Miami, FL
Sep 19, 2008
#33
  • Sep 19, 2008
  • #33
talking smack... post your video.
 

67Thunder

New Member
Jun 19, 2005
101
0
0
Vancouver, Canada
Sep 19, 2008
#34
  • Sep 19, 2008
  • #34
hivewax said:
i have the MagnaFlow s/s 2.5" exhaust x-over connected to JBA Tri-Y's to a 289 stroked 347 w/AFR185's + Holley 670cfm Street Avenger producing around 450hp. idles betw/1000-1500rpm. 3 clips on YouTube channel:

YouTube - hivewax's Channel
Click to expand...

That's a nice sounding motor. What cam are you using?
 

hipo_p51

Member
Jun 13, 2008
199
2
19
Sep 19, 2008
#35
  • Sep 19, 2008
  • #35
Rusty67 said:
I rest my case.
Click to expand...

no case to rest.

the best motors deserve the best mufflers.

flowmaster.

sounds like a commercial

and ps

mr hive, gets some real mufflers!:Zip2:
 

tx65coupe

Active Member
Nov 29, 1999
1,551
1
37
Sep 20, 2008
#36
  • Sep 20, 2008
  • #36
I agree that the 40 series sounds the best. That is what I have for my 65. I have a super 40 on my F150. I just thought that if he preferred the Flowmaster sound that 50 series would be a little quieter. A friend of mine has them on his 70 Mustang with 302. They sound pretty good.
 

Rusty67

20+ Year Stangneter
Dec 3, 2002
3,749
37
109
LA, CA
Sep 20, 2008
#37
  • Sep 20, 2008
  • #37
hipo_p51 said:
no case to rest.

the best motors deserve the best mufflers.

flowmaster.

sounds like a commercial

and ps

mr hive, gets some real mufflers!:Zip2:
Click to expand...

So what you are saying is that a muffler that is proven time and again that it will lead to lower performance when compaired to another muffler is a better muffler ?

You do know that HP and torque stats don't work like golf scores right ?
 

zookeeper

Founding Member
Aug 25, 2001
3,415
63
109
Rogue River, Oregon
Sep 20, 2008
#38
  • Sep 20, 2008
  • #38
I thought you were resting your case. What's this, your closing arguement?
 

hipo_p51

Member
Jun 13, 2008
199
2
19
Sep 20, 2008
#39
  • Sep 20, 2008
  • #39
the flowmasters i have are an old school version. far better than the curent ones for sale and any magnaflow.

all i can say in defense is my motor was built to run with a low restrictive exhaust system. my old flowmasters do the trick and sound very nice.

take this for what it is worth.

ps, i do not like golf!
 

hivewax

Member
Jan 1, 2006
233
0
17
Miami, FL
Sep 20, 2008
#40
  • Sep 20, 2008
  • #40
engine has the COMP Cams THUMPR camshaft... 10.6:1 compression. I could of went with the Big MUTHA THUMPR, but this car is just for the street and this engine eats too much gas as is. I'll need to hear some FlowMasters to know what smack you all are talking about. peace.
 
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Next
First Prev 2 of 5 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

T
Resolved Exhaust/Muffler tips
  • Tom77
  • May 9, 2025
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
6
Views
343
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- May 9, 2025
Tom77
T
Eastern North Carolina Autocross Events!
  • Warhorse Racing
  • Feb 23, 2026
  • Regional Forums and Event Information
Replies
0
Views
328
Regional Forums and Event Information Feb 23, 2026
Warhorse Racing
H
New kid on the block
  • HydraX
  • Mar 22, 2025
  • The Welcome Wagon
Replies
17
Views
698
The Welcome Wagon Mar 22, 2025
HydraX
H
Exhaust Which Mufflers?
  • joetrainer31
  • Oct 3, 2023
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2
Replies
20
Views
3K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Oct 9, 2023
joetrainer31
Place to Avoid: Jamison Auto Group in Gulfport, MS
  • D Durden
  • Oct 20, 2025
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • 2 3
Replies
45
Views
2K
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Feb 4, 2026
nickyb
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?